On the Effectiveness of Sexual Offender Treatment in Prisons: A Comparison of Two Different Evaluation Designs in Routine Practice

Language
en
Document Type
Article
Issue Date
2020-05-15
First published
2020-06-01
Issue Year
2020
Authors
Lösel, Friedrich
Link, Eva
Schmucker, Martin
Bender, Doris
Breuer, Maike
Carl, Lena
Endres, Johann
Lauchs, Lora
Editor
Jennings, Wesley G.
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Abstract

Although there is less continuity of sexual offending in the life course than stereotypes suggest, treatment should lead to a further reduction of reoffending. Contrary to this aim, a recent large British study using propensity score matching (PSM) showed some negative effects of the core sex offender treatment program (SOTP) in prisons. International meta-analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment revealed that there is considerable variety in the results, and methodological aspects and the context play a significant role. Therefore, this study compared different designs in the evaluation of sex offender treatment in German prisons. PSM was compared with an exact matching (EM) by the Static-99 in a sample of 693 sex offenders from Bavarian prisons. Most results were similar for both methods and not significant due to low base rates. There was a treatment effect at p < .05 on general recidivism in the EM and at p = .06 on serious reoffending in the PSM. For sexual recidivism, EM showed a negative trend, whereas PSM suggested the opposite. Overall, the study underlines the need for more replications of evaluations of routine practice, methodological comparisons, sensitive outcome criteria, and differentiated policy information.

Journal Title
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment
Volume
32
Issue
4
Citation
Zugehörige ORCIDs