- AutorIn
- Susanne Knappe Technische Universität Dresden, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Germany
- Jens KlotscheTechnische Universität Dresden, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Germany
- Franziska HeydeTechnische Universität Dresden, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Germany
- Sarah Hiob
- Jens Siegert
- Jürgen Hoyer
- Anja Strobel
- Richard T. LeBeau
- Michelle G. Craske
- Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
- Katja Beesdo-Baum
- Titel
- Test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the dimensional anxiety scales for DSM-5
- Zitierfähige Url:
- https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-390109
- Quellenangabe
- CNS Spectrums Erscheinungsort: Cambridge
Verlag: Cambride University Press
Erscheinungsjahr: 2014
Jahrgang: 19
Heft: 3
Seiten: 256-267
ISSN: 1092-8529
E-ISSN: 2165-6509 - Erstveröffentlichung
- 2014
- Abstract (EN)
- Objective. This article reports on the test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change of a set of brief dimensional self-rating questionnaires for social anxiety disorder (SAD-D), specific phobia (SP-D), agoraphobia (AG-D), panic disorder (PD-D), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-D), as well as a general cross-cutting anxiety scale (Cross-D), which were developed to supplement categorical diagnoses in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5). Methods. The German versions of the dimensional anxiety scales were administered to 218 students followed up approximately 2 weeks later (Study 1) and 55 outpatients (23 with anxiety diagnoses) followed-up 1 year later (Study 2). Probable diagnostic status in students was determined by the DIA-X/M-CIDI stem screening-questionnaire (SSQ). In the clinical sample, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnoses were assessed at Time 1 using the DIA-X/M-CIDI. At Time 2, the patient-version of the Clinical Global Impression— Improvement scale (CGI-I) was applied to assess change. Results: Good psychometric properties, including high test–retest reliability, were found for the dimensional scales except for SP-D. In outpatients, improvement at Time 2 was associated with significant decrease in PD-D, GAD-D, and Cross-D scores. Discussion. Major advantages of the scales include that they are brief, concise, and based on a consistent template to measure the cognitive, physiological, and ehavioral symptoms of fear and anxiety. Further replication in larger samples is needed. Given its modest psychometric properties, SP-D needs refinement. Conclusion. Increasing evidence from diverse samples suggests clinical utility of the dimensional anxiety scales.
- Andere Ausgabe
- Link zum Artikel der zuerst in der Zeitschrift 'CNS Spectrums' erschienen ist
DOI: 10.1017/S1092852913000710 - Freie Schlagwörter (DE)
- Angst, Beurteilung, Diagnostik, DSM, Psychometrie
- Freie Schlagwörter (EN)
- Anxiety, assessment, diagnostic, DSM, psychometric
- Klassifikation (DDC)
- 610
- Verlag
- Cambride University Press, Cambride
- Version / Begutachtungsstatus
- publizierte Version / Verlagsversion
- URN Qucosa
- urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa2-390109
- Veröffentlichungsdatum Qucosa
- 17.06.2020
- Dokumenttyp
- Artikel
- Sprache des Dokumentes
- Englisch
- Lizenz / Rechtehinweis