Open Access

Matthias Münch, Susanne Kilian

• Because CFD programs, like FDS, generally consist of a large number of different components representing the variety of participating numerical algorithms and chemical / physical processes, it is nearly impossible to verify such codes in their entirety, for example with comparisons of fire tests. Instead, a careful verification and validation with respect to the underlying mathematical conditions and applied numerical schemes is indispensable. In particular, error cancelations between single program components can only be detected by such detailed component-level tests. In part I of this article series a conceptual deficiency of the FDS program package with regard to multi-mesh computations was illustrated and an alternative domain decomposition strategy FDS-ScaRC was introduced. In this second part we will present the structure of a comprehensive test concept and the needs for a more mathematically and numerically orientated test procedure that is much more suited for a reliable evaluation than only a simple visual comparison of the numerical results with experimental fire tests. After a general introduction of our test concept we will demonstrate the high potential of the new FDS-\scarc{} technique compared to the FDS-FFT technique which is used in the FDS program package as yet. Based on this concept, we will present a comprehensive set of analytical and numerical test results.