SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(1.589Mb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-99769-7

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

The Impact of the Pandemic on Opinion toward the Role of Government in Australia

[journal article]

Biddle, Nicholas
Edwards, Benjamin
Gray, Matthew
McAllister, Ian

Abstract

The 2020-23 COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a level of government-imposed restrictions on personal freedom unknown outside of wartime. How did these restrictions affect citizens’ views about the appropriate role of government? To answer this question, we use a unique longitudinal dataset that matches ... view more

The 2020-23 COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a level of government-imposed restrictions on personal freedom unknown outside of wartime. How did these restrictions affect citizens’ views about the appropriate role of government? To answer this question, we use a unique longitudinal dataset that matches the public’s views about the role of government in Australia to local variations in restrictions on personal freedom aimed at reducing community infection. We identify the extent to which local level restrictions on personal freedom, which varied widely across Australia, affected the public's views about government intervention. The results show that there was initial support for intervention but continuing restrictions on personal freedom resulted in less support for government intervention, particularly in areas of government policy that affected relatively small population groups. The findings suggest that restrictions on personal freedom significantly changed the public’s views about the role of government in their lives.... view less

Keywords
ISSP; contagious disease; epidemic; freedom; public opinion; government policy; Australia

Classification
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture

Free Keywords
Corona; COVID-19; Coronavirus; pandemic; personal freedom; International Social Survey Programme: Religion IV - ISSP 2018 (ZA7570); ISSP 2021; ISSP 2022; ISSP 2023

Document language
English

Publication Year
2024

Page/Pages
p. 67-86

Journal
International journal of sociology, 54 (2024) 2

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2023.2273045

ISSN
1557-9336

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 

This website uses cookies. The data policy provides further information, including your rights for opt-out.