Download full text
(298.6Kb)
Citation Suggestion
Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-213043
Exports for your reference manager
Pseudo-science: a meaningful context for assessing nature of science
[journal article]
Abstract
Although an understanding of nature of science is a core element in scientific literacy, there is considerable evidence that school and university students hold naïve conceptions about it. It is argued that, whilst the failure to learn about nature of science arises from its neglect in formal scienc... view more
Although an understanding of nature of science is a core element in scientific literacy, there is considerable evidence that school and university students hold naïve conceptions about it. It is argued that, whilst the failure to learn about nature of science arises from its neglect in formal science education, a major reason is the adherence to the precepts of pseudo-science, a set of beliefs that have wide cultural currency in the general population. University science and non-science students were interviewed about their beliefs in and explanations for ‘water dowsing’, a pseudo-scientific approach to finding groundwater. The demarcation criteria between science and pseudo-science and students’ research designs into ‘water dowsing’ were also enquired into. The results show that many students believed in the working efficacy of water dowsing and stated pseudo-scientific explanations for it. Furthermore, they were unaware of the demarcation criteria between science and pseudo-science, and designed naïve research studies to enquire into 'water dowsing'.... view less
Classification
Sociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technology
University Education
Free Keywords
nature of science; scientific literacy; university; pseudo-science
Document language
English
Publication Year
2010
Page/Pages
p. 329-348
Journal
International Journal of Science Education, 32 (2010) 3
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903055758
Status
Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence
PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)