Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study.

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_A4E38BC79743.pdf (361.63 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_A4E38BC79743
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study.
Journal
Medicine
Author(s)
Schüle S., Rossel J.B., Frey D., Biedermann L., Scharl M., Zeitz J., Freitas-Queiroz N., Kuntzen T., Greuter T., Vavricka S.R., Rogler G., Misselwitz B.
Working group(s)
Swiss IBD cohort study
ISSN
1536-5964 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0025-7974
Publication state
Published
Issued date
06/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
96
Number
22
Pages
e6788
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Observational Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis remain frequent problems in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Several guidelines with nonidentical recommendations exist and there is no general agreement regarding the optimal approach for osteoporosis screening in IBD patients. Clinical practice of osteoporosis screening and treatment remains insufficiently investigated.In the year 2014, a chart review of 877 patients included in the Swiss IBD Cohort study was performed to assess details of osteoporosis diagnostics and treatment. BMD measurements, osteoporosis treatment, and IBD medication were recorded.Our chart review revealed 253 dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in 877 IBD patients; osteoporosis was prevalent in 20% of tested patients. We identified widely differing osteoporosis screening rates among centers (11%-62%). A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified predictive factors for screening including steroid usage, long disease duration, and perianal disease; even after correction for all risk factors, the study center remained a strong independent predictor (odds ratio 2.3-21 compared to the center with the lowest screening rate). Treatment rates for patients with osteoporosis were suboptimal (55% for calcium, 65% for vitamin D) at the time of chart review. Similarly, a significant fraction of patients with current steroid medication were not treated with vitamin D or calcium (treatment rates 53% for calcium, 58% for vitamin D). For only 29% of patients with osteoporosis bisphosphonate treatment was started. Treatment rates also differed among centers, generally following screening rates. In patients with longitudinal DXA scans, calcium and vitamin D usage was significantly associated with improvement of BMD over time.Our analysis identified inconsistent usage of osteoporosis screening and underuse of osteoporosis treatment in IBD patients. Increasing awareness of osteoporosis as a significant clinical problem in IBD patients might improve patient care.

Keywords
Absorptiometry, Photon, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/therapy, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Osteoporosis/complications, Osteoporosis/diagnosis, Osteoporosis/epidemiology, Osteoporosis/therapy, Prevalence, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Switzerland, Young Adult
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
06/06/2017 17:50
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:10
Usage data