Ex vivo confocal microscopy for surgical margin assessment: a histologycompared study on 109 specimens.

Details

Ressource 1Download: thèse-GL-OK.pdf (1642.47 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: After imprimatur
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_4611B034FBF7
Type
PhD thesis: a PhD thesis.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Ex vivo confocal microscopy for surgical margin assessment: a histologycompared study on 109 specimens.
Author(s)
GRIZZETTI Lorenzo
Director(s)
Kuonen François
Institution details
Université de Lausanne, Faculté de biologie et médecine
Publication state
Accepted
Issued date
2022
Language
english
Abstract
Background: The assessment of surgical margins is mandatory to prevent local recurrence or distant dissemination of skin cancers. Histological ex- amination of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)‐stained slides from paraffin‐ embedded or frozen samples is the gold standard for margin assessment, but is a time‐consuming procedure. Ex vivo confocal laser scanning mi- croscopy (CLSM) is an upcoming technique that scans unfixed fresh tissue rapidly, allowing fast per‐operative margin assessment.
Objective: Here, we propose to assess the efficiency of a new ex vivo confocal microscope for the per‐operative assessment of surgical margins. Methods: We analyzed 16 biopsies and 93 surgical specimens of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas by ex vivo CLSM using Histolog® Scanner V2. Surgical specimens included fusiform excisions, slow‐Mohs peripheral and deep compartments, and Mohs excisions. The time required from surgical excision to image analysis was recorded and the quality of the images obtained for each specimen assessed. The presence or absence of tumour was estimated based on ex vivo CLSM images and compared with conventional H&E‐stained sections from paraffin‐embedded or frozen (Mohs) specimens.
Results: Mean time for specimen processing using Histolog Scanner was 5.1 3.4 min. We obtained 89% of high quality images. Mean time for confocal image analysis was 1 0.76 min. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for ex vivo CLSM compared to classical H&E procedures were respectively 93% and 100% when performed on tumour biopsies. The overall sensitivity and specificity for ex vivo CLSM for margin assessment compared to classical H&E procedures were respectively 61.5% and 95%, with variations depending on the type of tumour or surgical specimen analyzed. In particular, we obtained 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the assessment of BCC surgical margins.
Conclusion: Our data suggest that ex vivo CLSM using Histolog® Scanner V2 could be a valid help for surgeons for a fast and accurate per‐operative margin analysis.
Create date
02/05/2023 10:14
Last modification date
15/05/2023 10:52
Usage data