S-Guide® : Comparaison du S-Guide avec le Gliderite®, dans l’intubation au vidéolaryngoscope chez des patients aux voies aériennes difficiles simulées

Details

Ressource 1Download: Travail_de_Thèse_OK.pdf (844.12 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: After imprimatur
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_3A7CEE69058F
Type
PhD thesis: a PhD thesis.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
S-Guide® : Comparaison du S-Guide avec le Gliderite®, dans l’intubation au vidéolaryngoscope chez des patients aux voies aériennes difficiles simulées
Author(s)
Nkoulou Coralie Anne Agnès
Director(s)
Schoettker Patrick
Institution details
Université de Lausanne, Faculté de biologie et médecine
Publication state
Accepted
Issued date
2021
Language
french
Abstract
Objective: Gliderite™, one of the first stylets designed specifically to assist tracheal intubation with non-channelled curved blades videolaryngoscopes, can cause injury. The S-Guide® is a new, malleable, intubating guide allowing oxygenation. Its soft tip is designed to prevent trauma. We aimed to compare the duration of tracheal intubation with S-Guide compared to Gliderite using a C-MAC® D-Blade® videolaryngoscope in patients with simulated difficult airways.
Methods: We performed a single blinded prospective randomised study, with 50 adult patients requiring orotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia in Lausanne University Hospital. A cervical collar was fitted around patient’s neck to simulate difficult intubation conditions.
Exclusion criteria were ASA>3, BMI > 35 kg/m2, known or at risk of difficult intubation and risk of aspiration of gastric content. We recorded T1: Time to identification of the glottis; T2: time to inflate the cuff and T3: total intubation time (capnography curve appearance). Secondary outcomes were the presence of arytenoid contact during intubation and post-operative airway discomfort
Results: There were no significant differences between T1 and T2 (sec) while using the S- Guide or Gliderite respectively: 14.6 [9.6–18.6] vs 16.5 [11.0–20.6]; P=0.368 and 43.3 [33.2–
49.3] vs 46.3 [35.6–61.5], P=0.308. T3 (sec) was shorter in the S-Guide group: 58.1 [50.2–61.8] vs 65.3 [57.6–78.7], P=0.044. Fewer arytenoid contact occurred during intubation using the S- Guide (P=0.032), without difference in post-operative airway discomfort.
Conclusion: S-Guide assisted tracheal intubation, with a C-MAC D-Blade in simulated difficult airways, allows successful and faster intubation than with the Gliderite Stylet.
Keywords
videolaryngoscopic intubation, difficult airways, intubation trauma, stylet
Create date
30/11/2021 12:04
Last modification date
14/03/2024 8:09
Usage data