Deferral of Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction Based on Physiological Assessment: Impact on Long-Term Survival.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 36129045_BIB_21EBA9974BE3.pdf (2064.95 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_21EBA9974BE3
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Deferral of Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction Based on Physiological Assessment: Impact on Long-Term Survival.
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Author(s)
Gallinoro E., Paolisso P., Di Gioia G., Bermpeis K., Fernandez-Peregrina E., Candreva A., Esposito G., Fabbricatore D., Bertolone D.T., Bartunek J., Vanderheyden M., Wyffels E., Sonck J., Collet C., De Bruyne B., Barbato E.
ISSN
2047-9980 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2047-9980
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/10/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Number
19
Pages
e026656
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Background Deferring revascularization in patients with nonsignificant stenoses based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with favorable clinical outcomes up to 15 years. Whether this holds true in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction is unclear. We aimed to investigate whether FFR provides adjunctive clinical benefit compared with coronary angiography in deferring revascularization of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤50%) undergoing coronary angiography between 2002 and 2010 were screened. We included patients with at least 1 intermediate coronary stenosis (diameter stenosis ≥40%) in whom revascularization was deferred based either on angiography plus FFR (FFR guided) or angiography alone (angiography guided). The primary end point was the cumulative incidence of all-cause death at 10 years. The secondary end point (incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events) was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, any revascularization, and stroke. A total of 840 patients were included (206 in the FFR-guided group and 634 in the angiography-guided group). Median follow-up was 7 years (interquartile range, 3.22-11.08 years). After 1:1 propensity-score matching, baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar. All-cause death was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group compared with the angiography-guided group (94 [45.6%] versus 119 [57.8%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.49-0.85]; P<0.01). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was lower in the FFR-guided group (123 [59.7%] versus 139 [67.5%]; HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.95]; P=0.02). Conclusions In patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, deferring revascularization of intermediate coronary stenoses based on FFR is associated with a lower incidence of death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 10 years.
Keywords
Coronary Angiography/methods, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis, Coronary Artery Disease/surgery, Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging, Coronary Stenosis/surgery, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial/physiology, Humans, Myocardial Revascularization, Stroke Volume, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Function, Left, coronary angiography, coronary artery disease, fractional flow reserve, myocardial, myocardial infarction, myocardial revascularization
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
27/09/2022 9:11
Last modification date
25/01/2024 8:32
Usage data