Commento alla sentenza del Landgericht Köln del 7 maggio 2012 in tema di circoncisione e commento alla nuova normativa § 1631d del codice civile tedesco (BGB)

  • Kommentar zu § 1631d BGB (Beschneidung aus religiösen Gründen, elterliches Sorgerecht), Kommentar zum Urteil des Landgerichts Köln vom 7. Mai 2012 (Strafrecht, Religionsfreiheit)
  • In May 2012 a misleading decision of the Landgericht (Court of Appeal) Cologne declared that male circumcision in children amounts to be a criminal offence, even if performed lege artis and with the consent of the parents. The article pays attention to the new legislation of December 2012 introduced into the BGB as a legal framework of male circumcision with regard to the right of freedom of religion and the parental rights in education especially for Jewish and Muslims in Germany.

Download full text files

  • Dokument_1.pdf(mul)
    (240KB)

    SHA-1:bf51c1908c47a89ce91e9345720532eab8eec178

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Stefan GatzhammerGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-72075
Publication series (Volume number):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Rechtswissenschaftliche Reihe (2)
Publication type:Postprint
Language:Multiple languages
Publication year:2013
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2014/11/17
Tag:BGB; Beschneidung aus religiösen Motiven; Religionsrecht; Strafrecht; elterliches Sorgerecht
German civil code; criminal law; legal custody; male circumcision; religious law
Source:Il Diritto Ecclesiastico 124 (2013) 355-364
Organizational units:Juristische Fakultät / Bürgerliches Recht
DDC classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht
License (German):License LogoKeine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.