Beyond radicalism and resignation: the competing logics for public participation in policy decisions

  • Participation – like justice or freedom – is a term that can be constructed in multiple ways. However, existing typologies of participation pay little attention to the alternative logics for public participation in policy decisions: either they assume one particular normative bias or categorise by institutional design features without reference to the broader ideology that informs the use of these designs. This paper outlines an alternative approach that connects the variety in participatory practices to competing theories of democracy and public administration. It identifies four archetypes of participation: knowledge transfer; collective decision-making; choice and voice; and arbitration and oversight.
Metadaten
Author:Rikki John Dean
URN:urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-629523
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1332/ 030557316X14531466517034
ISSN:0305-5736
ISSN:1470-8442
Parent Title (English):Policy & Politics
Publisher:Policy Press
Place of publication:Bristol
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2016/02/12
Date of first Publication:2016/02/12
Publishing Institution:Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Release Date:2021/11/01
Tag:citizen engagement; grid-group cultural theory; participatory governance; public participation
Volume:45
Issue:2
Page Number:18
First Page:213
Last Page:230
Note:
Postprint von Dean RJ (2017) Beyond radicalism and resignation: the competing logics for public participation in policy decisions, Policy & Politics, vol 45, no 2, 213–30, DOI:10.1332/030557316X14531466517034
HeBIS-PPN:489326293
Institutes:Gesellschaftswissenschaften / Gesellschaftswissenschaften
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 32 Politikwissenschaft / 320 Politikwissenschaft
Sammlungen:Universitätspublikationen
Licence (German):License LogoDeutsches Urheberrecht