Comment on Johannes Servan: 'What Justice Requires' – a State-Centric Bias in the Ethics of Migration

This paper comments on a talk given by Johannes Servan at the 2018 ZiF Workshop "Studying Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis", September 2018, in Bielefeld. Servan rightly emphasises the problem of biased attitudes in political philosophy....

Verfasser: Hoesch, Matthias
Dokumenttypen:Artikel
Medientypen:Text
Erscheinungsdatum:2019
Publikation in MIAMI:11.04.2019
Datum der letzten Änderung:13.04.2021
Quelle:Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop "Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis", S. 139-142
Angaben zur Ausgabe:[Electronic ed.]
Schlagwörter:Exzellenzcluster Religion und Politik; Staatszentriertheit; Migrationsethik; Flüchtlinge Cluster of Excellence Religion and Politics; state-centric bias; ethics of migration; refugees
Fachgebiet (DDC):172: Politische Ethik
325: Internationale Migration, Kolonisation
Lizenz:CC BY-SA 4.0
Sprache:English
Format:PDF-Dokument
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-95189431486
Weitere Identifikatoren:DOI: 10.17879/95189431160
Permalink:https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-95189431486
Onlinezugriff:artikel_hoesch_2019c_comment-on-servan.pdf

This paper comments on a talk given by Johannes Servan at the 2018 ZiF Workshop "Studying Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis", September 2018, in Bielefeld. Servan rightly emphasises the problem of biased attitudes in political philosophy. However, that problem can only be countered by evaluating the arguments that are raised in the debate. Although some of Servan’s observations might be true, more normative reasoning would be necessary in order to level fundamental criticism at the current debate. Servan’s paper is available under doi: 10.17879/95189431960.