Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
Introduction: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. Methods: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specime...
| Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| FB/Einrichtung: | FB 05: Medizinische Fakultät |
| Dokumenttypen: | Artikel |
| Medientypen: | Text |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2014 |
| Publikation in MIAMI: | 09.01.2015 |
| Datum der letzten Änderung: | 16.04.2019 |
| Angaben zur Ausgabe: | [Electronic ed.] |
| Quelle: | BMC Head & Face Medicine 10 (2014) 51, 1-6 |
| Schlagwörter: | Retainer; Wire; Adhesive; Sandblasting; Shear bond strength |
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 610: Medizin und Gesundheit |
| Lizenz: | CC BY 4.0 |
| Sprache: | English |
| Anmerkungen: | Finanziert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2014/2015 der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) und der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU Münster). |
| Format: | PDF-Dokument |
| ISSN: | 1746-160X |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-90389477603 |
| Weitere Identifikatoren: | DOI: doi:10.1186/1746-160X-10-51 |
| Permalink: | https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-90389477603 |
| Onlinezugriff: | 1746-160X-10-51.pdf |
Introduction: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. Methods: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid™, GAC-Wildcat®-Twistflex and everStick®ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond™-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow™ and Stick®FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS. Results: While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond™-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow™ that were comparable to those for everStick®ORTHO. Conclusions: Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond™-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow™ and everStick®ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use.