Platons \(\it Parmenides\) und Marsilio Ficinos \(\it Parmenides\)-Kommentar - ein kritischer Vergleich
- The Platonic dialogue ‚Philosophos‘ is usually considered to be a lost work. The author shows that Plato completed the trilogy ‚Sophistes‘‚ ‘Politikos‘ and ‚Philosophos‘ with the ‚Parmenides‘ – hence, that the lost ‚Philosophos‘ is identical with the existing ‚Parmenides‘. The dialectical exercise of the ‚Parmenides‘ demonstrates a kind of theory of subjectivity in which the One reveals to be the human soul. The human soul – through the multiplicity of its sentences and their dialogical unity – therefore creates reality. In Ficino’s exegetical approach reality is not described as a creation of the human soul – on the contrary it appears to be a well-organised hierarchy.
Author: | Arne MalmsheimerGND |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-15951 |
Referee: | Burkhard MojsischGND, Theo KobuschGND |
Document Type: | Doctoral Thesis |
Language: | German |
Date of Publication (online): | 2006/05/11 |
Date of first Publication: | 2006/05/11 |
Publishing Institution: | Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek |
Granting Institution: | Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Fakultät für Philosophie und Erziehungswissenschaft |
Date of final exam: | 1999/12/21 |
Creating Corporation: | Fakultät für Philosophie und Erziehungswissenschaft |
GND-Keyword: | Dialog / Philosophie; Seele; Einheit; Ideenlehre; Plato / Parmenides |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | Philosophie und Psychologie / Philosophie |
faculties: | Fakultät für Philosophie und Erziehungswissenschaft |
Licence (German): | Keine Creative Commons Lizenz - es gelten der Veröffentlichungsvertrag und das deutsche Urheberrecht |