Lack of repeatability of radiomic features derived from PET scans: results from a 18F‐DCFPyL test–retest cohort

  • Objectives PET-based radiomic metrics are increasingly utilized as predictive image biomarkers. However, the repeatability of radiomic features on PET has not been assessed in a test–retest setting. The prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted compound 18F-DCFPyL is a high-affinity, high-contrast PET agent that we utilized in a test-retest cohort of men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC). Methods Data of 21 patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial with histologically proven PC underwent two 18F-DCFPyL PET scans within 7 days, using identical acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Sites of disease were segmented and a set of 29 different radiomic parameters were assessed on both scans. We determined repeatability of quantification by using Pearson's correlations, within-subject coefficient of variation (wCOV), and Bland–Altman analysis. Results In total, 230 lesions (177 bone, 38 lymph nodes, 15 others) were assessed on both scans. For all investigatedObjectives PET-based radiomic metrics are increasingly utilized as predictive image biomarkers. However, the repeatability of radiomic features on PET has not been assessed in a test–retest setting. The prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted compound 18F-DCFPyL is a high-affinity, high-contrast PET agent that we utilized in a test-retest cohort of men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC). Methods Data of 21 patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial with histologically proven PC underwent two 18F-DCFPyL PET scans within 7 days, using identical acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Sites of disease were segmented and a set of 29 different radiomic parameters were assessed on both scans. We determined repeatability of quantification by using Pearson's correlations, within-subject coefficient of variation (wCOV), and Bland–Altman analysis. Results In total, 230 lesions (177 bone, 38 lymph nodes, 15 others) were assessed on both scans. For all investigated radiomic features, a broad range of inter-scan correlation was found (r, 0.07–0.95), with acceptable reproducibility for entropy and homogeneity (wCOV, 16.0% and 12.7%, respectively). On Bland–Altman analysis, no systematic increase or decrease between the scans was observed for either parameter (±1.96 SD: 1.07/−1.30, 0.23/−0.18, respectively). The remaining 27 tested radiomic metrics, however, achieved unacceptable high wCOV (≥21.7%). Conclusion Many common radiomic features derived from a test–retest PET study had poor repeatability. Only Entropy and homogeneity achieved good repeatability, supporting the notion that those image biomarkers may be incorporated in future clinical trials. Those radiomic features based on high frequency aspects of images appear to lack the repeatability on PET to justify further study.show moreshow less
Metadaten
Author:Rudolf A. Werner, Bilêl Habacha, Susanne Lütje, Lena Bundschuh, Alekandser Kosmala, Markus Essler, Thorsten Derlin, Takahiro Higuchi, Constantin LapaORCiDGND, Andreas K. Buck, Kenneth J. Pienta, Martin A. Lodge, Mario A. Eisenberger, Mark C. Markowski, Martin G. Pomper, Michael A. Gorin, Eric C. Frey, Steven P. Rowe, Ralph A. Bundschuh
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1020339
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/102033
ISSN:0270-4137OPAC
ISSN:1097-0045OPAC
Parent Title (English):The Prostate
Publisher:Wiley
Place of publication:Hoboken, NJ
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2023
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2023/02/15
Tag:Urology; Oncology
Volume:83
Issue:6
First Page:547
Last Page:554
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24483
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Nuklearmedizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitung (mit Print on Demand)