Influence of soft tissue augmentation procedures around dental implants on marginal bone level changes-A systematic review

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258394
  • Objectives This systematic review assessed the influence of soft tissue augmentation procedures on marginal bone level changes in partial or fully edentulous patients. Material and Methods We identified three relevant PICO questions related to soft tissue augmentation procedures and conducted a systematic search of four major electronic databases for clinical studies in systemically healthy patients receiving at least one dental implant and a minimum follow-up of one year after implant placement. The primary outcome was mean difference inObjectives This systematic review assessed the influence of soft tissue augmentation procedures on marginal bone level changes in partial or fully edentulous patients. Material and Methods We identified three relevant PICO questions related to soft tissue augmentation procedures and conducted a systematic search of four major electronic databases for clinical studies in systemically healthy patients receiving at least one dental implant and a minimum follow-up of one year after implant placement. The primary outcome was mean difference in marginal bone levels, and secondary outcomes were clinical and patient-related outcomes such as thickness of peri-implant mucosa, bleeding indices, and Pink Esthetic Score. Results We identified 20 publications reporting on 16 relevant comparisons. Studies varied considerably and thus only two meta-analyses could be performed. This systematic review showed that: Soft tissue augmentation either for augmentation of keratinized mucosa or soft tissue volume inconsistently had an effect on marginal bone level changes when compared to no soft tissue augmentation, but consistently improved secondary outcomes. The combination soft and hard tissue augmentation showed no statistically significant difference in terms of marginal bone level changes when compared to hard tissue augmentation alone, but resulted in less marginal soft tissue recession as shown by a meta-analysis. Soft or hard tissue augmentation performed as contour augmentations resulted in comparable marginal bone level changes. Conclusions Peri-implant soft and hard tissues seem to have a bidirectional relationship: “Bone stands hard, but soft tissue is the guard”.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Stefan FicklORCiD, Annika Therese Kröger, Thomas Dietrich, Moritz Kebschull
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258394
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Abteilung für Parodontologie (in der Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie)
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Clinical Oral Implants Research
Year of Completion:2021
Volume:32
Issue:S21
Pagenumber:108–137
Source:Clinical Oral Implants Research 2021, 32(S21):108–137. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13829
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13829
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:alveolar ridge augmentation; bone augmentation; dental implants; guided bone regeneration; guided tissue regeneration; soft tissue augmentation
Release Date:2022/04/04
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY-NC: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung, Nicht kommerziell 4.0 International