Hydrophilic (AB)\(_{n}\) Segmented Copolymers for Melt Extrusion‐Based Additive Manufacturing

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-224513
  • Several manufacturing technologies beneficially involve processing from the melt, including extrusion‐based printing, electrospinning, and electrohydrodynamic jetting. In this study, (AB)\(_{n}\) segmented copolymers are tailored for melt‐processing to form physically crosslinked hydrogels after swelling. The copolymers are composed of hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol)‐based segments and hydrophobic bisurea segments, which form physical crosslinks via hydrogen bonds. The degree of polymerization was adjusted to match the melt viscosity to theSeveral manufacturing technologies beneficially involve processing from the melt, including extrusion‐based printing, electrospinning, and electrohydrodynamic jetting. In this study, (AB)\(_{n}\) segmented copolymers are tailored for melt‐processing to form physically crosslinked hydrogels after swelling. The copolymers are composed of hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol)‐based segments and hydrophobic bisurea segments, which form physical crosslinks via hydrogen bonds. The degree of polymerization was adjusted to match the melt viscosity to the different melt‐processing techniques. Using extrusion‐based printing, a width of approximately 260 µm is printed into 3D constructs, with excellent interlayer bonding at fiber junctions, due to hydrogen bonding between the layers. For melt electrospinning, much thinner fibers in the range of about 1–15 µm are obtained and produced in a typical nonwoven morphology. With melt electrowriting, fibers are deposited in a controlled way to well‐defined 3D constructs. In this case, multiple fiber layers fuse together enabling constructs with line width in the range of 70 to 160 µm. If exposed to water the printed constructs swell and form physically crosslinked hydrogels that slowly disintegrate, which is a feature for soluble inks within biofabrication strategies. In this context, cytotoxicity tests confirm the viability of cells and thus demonstrating biocompatibility of this class of copolymers.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Jannik Mechau, Andreas Frank, Ezgi Bakirci, Simon Gumbel, Tomasz Jungst, Reiner Giesa, Jürgen Groll, Paul D. Dalton, Hans‐Werner Schmidt
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-224513
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Abteilung für Funktionswerkstoffe der Medizin und der Zahnheilkunde
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics
Year of Completion:2021
Volume:222
Issue:1
Article Number:2000265
Source:Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 2021, 222(1):2000265. DOI: 10.1002/macp.202000265
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.202000265
Dewey Decimal Classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 54 Chemie / 540 Chemie und zugeordnete Wissenschaften
Tag:(AB)\(_{n}\) segmented copolymers; 3D printing; biocompatibility; melt electrowriting
Release Date:2021/11/17
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International