Repeated kidney re‐transplantation—the Eurotransplant experience: a retrospective multicenter outcome analysis

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214161
  • In Eurotransplant kidney allocation system (ETKAS), candidates can be considered unlimitedly for repeated re‐transplantation. Data on outcome and benefit are indeterminate. We performed a retrospective 15‐year patient and graft outcome data analysis from 1464 recipients of a third or fourth or higher sequential deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) from 42 transplant centers. Repeated re‐DDRT recipients were younger (mean 43.0 vs. 50.2 years) compared to first DDRT recipients. They received grafts with more favorable HLA matches (89.0%In Eurotransplant kidney allocation system (ETKAS), candidates can be considered unlimitedly for repeated re‐transplantation. Data on outcome and benefit are indeterminate. We performed a retrospective 15‐year patient and graft outcome data analysis from 1464 recipients of a third or fourth or higher sequential deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) from 42 transplant centers. Repeated re‐DDRT recipients were younger (mean 43.0 vs. 50.2 years) compared to first DDRT recipients. They received grafts with more favorable HLA matches (89.0% vs. 84.5%) but thereby no statistically significant improvement of patient and graft outcome was found as comparatively demonstrated in 1st DDRT. In the multivariate modeling accounting for confounding factors, mortality and graft loss after 3rd and ≥4th DDRT (P < 0.001 each) and death with functioning graft (DwFG) after 3rd DDRT (P = 0.001) were higher as compared to 1st DDRT. The incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF) was also significantly higher in re‐DDRT (12.7%) than in 1st DDRT (7.1%; P < 0.001). Facing organ shortage, increasing waiting time, and considerable mortality on dialysis, we question the current policy of repeated re‐DDRT. The data from this survey propose better HLA matching in first DDRT and second DDRT and careful selection of candidates, especially for ≥4th DDRT.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Volker Assfalg, Katharina Selig, Johanna Tolksdorf, Marieke van Meel, Erwin de Vries, Anne‐Marie Ramsoebhag, Axel Rahmel, Lutz Renders, Alexander Novotny, Edouard Matevossian, Stefan Schneeberger, Alexander R. Rosenkranz, Gabriela Berlakovich, Dirk Ysebaert, Noël Knops, Dirk Kuypers, Laurent Weekers, Anja Muehlfeld, Lars‐Christian Rump, Ingeborg Hauser, Przemyslaw Pisarski, Rolf Weimer, Paolo Fornara, Lutz Fischer, Volker Kliem, Urban Sester, Dirk Stippel, Wolfgang Arns, Hans‐Michael Hau, Martin Nitschke, Joachim Hoyer, Stefan Thorban, Julia Weinmann‐Menke, Katharina Heller, Bernhard Banas, Vedat Schwenger, Silvio Nadalin, Kai Lopau, Norbert Hüser, Uwe Heemann
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214161
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Transplant International
Year of Completion:2020
Volume:33
Issue:6
First Page:617
Last Page:631
Source:Transplant International 2020, 33(6):617-631. DOI: 10.1111/tri.13569
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13569
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:allocation; child; fourth; graft; kidney; loss; repeated; re‐transplantation; survival; third
Release Date:2021/04/15
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY-NC: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung, Nicht kommerziell 4.0 International