Download (376kB)
Abstract
The number of au-pairs in Germany is on the rise. In 2017, about 13,500 au-pairs were living in German families, almost half of them originating from non-EU countries and many of them from Spanish speaking countries. Knowledge about mental health among au-pairs in Germany is limited. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of Major Depressive Syndrome (MDS) and its potential association with time of residence among Spanish speaking au-pairs living in Germany. A cross-sectional study was carried out, which included a sample of 409 Spanish speaking au-pairs living in Germany. We classified the au-pairs into those who lived less than three weeks in Germany (newcomer au-pairs) and those who arrived two to ten months prior to the survey (experienced au-pairs). The participants were recruited by an online survey (Facebook and Instagram) from August 2018 to June 2019. Socio-demographic characteristics, time of residence in Germany and the level of education were assessed. MDS was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire depression module (PHQ-9). Poisson regression models were calculated to evaluate the association between time of residence in Germany and prevalence of MDS. Most of the participants were female (91%). Almost half of them came from Colombia (48%) and were in the age range between 22-24 years (40%). Prevalence of MDS was 8% among newcomers and 19% among experienced au-pairs (p=0.002). Differences remained statistically significant after adjustment for potential confounders (age, level of education and time of residence in Germany) (Prevalence Ratio 2.25; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.22-4.14). In conclusion, au-pairs may develop mental symptoms during their time abroad. Future prospective studies should aim at identifying potential risk factors and preventive measures.
| Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
|---|---|
| Publikationsform: | Preprint |
| Keywords: | Au-pairs; migrants; time of residence; mental health; Major Depressive Syndrome |
| Fakultät: | Medizin |
| Fakultätsübergreifende Einrichtungen: | Center for International Health (CIH) |
| Themengebiete: | 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 500 Naturwissenschaften |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-69339-9 |
| ISSN: | 1660-4601 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Dokumenten ID: | 69339 |
| Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 29. Okt. 2019, 15:14 |
| Letzte Änderungen: | 17. Aug. 2023, 11:52 |
| Literaturliste: | 1. Atkinson R, Flint J: Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies. Nigel Gilbert. edition. Guildford-England: Social Research Update; 2001. 2. Walter-Bolhöfer C: Konjunkturumfrage 2015: Entwicklungen und Trends im deutschen Au-pair-Wesen. Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, Germany: Calypso Verlag; 2015. 3. Walter-Bolhöfer C: Konjunkturumfrage 2017: Entwicklungen und Trends im deutschen Au-pair-Wesen. Dresden: Calypso Verlag; 2017. 4. Ganzeboom H, Treiman D: Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Sciences Research 1996, 25:201-239. 5. European Parliament: Policy Department C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Brussels. Abused Domestic Workers in Europe: The case of au pairs 2011:62-78. 6. Durin S: Ethnicity and the Au Pair Experience: Latin American Au Pairs in Marseille, France. In Au Pairs’ Lives in Global Context. New York, US: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN; 2015. 7. Cruz E, Van Dijk F, Radon K: Working conditions and health of au-pairs in Germany, a cross-sectional study. . 2018. 8. Manrai LA, Manrai AK: Effects of cultural-context, gender, and acculturation on perceptions of work versus social/leisure time usage. Journal of Business Research 1995, 32:115-128. 9. Würtz E: Intercultural Communication on Web sites:A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Web site sfrom High-Context Cultures andLow-Context Cultures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006:274–299. 10. Potochnick SR, Perreira KM: Depression and anxiety among first-generation immigrant Latino youth: key correlates and implications for future research. J Nerv Ment Dis 2010, 198(7):470–477. 11. Vang Z, Sigouin J, Flenon A, Gagnon A: The Healthy Immigrant Effect in Canada: A Systematic Review. Population Change and Lifecourse Strategic Knowledge Cluster Discussion Paper Series/ Un Réseau stratégique de connaissances Changements de population et parcours de vie Document de travail 2015, 3:4. 12. Robert A, Gilkinson T: Mental health and well-being of recent immigrants in Canada: Evidence from the Longitudinal Survey of Immigrants to Canada (LSIC) Citizenship and Immigration Canada 2013. 13. Sander M: Return Migration and the "Healthy Immigrant Effect". Berlin-Germany: SOEPpapers; 2007. 14. Vahabi M, Wong J: Caught between a rock and a hard place: mental health of migrant live-in caregivers in Canada. BMC Public Health 2017, 17:498. 15. Agadjanian V ZN: Sampling and surveying hard-to-reach populations for demographic research: A study of female labor migrants in Moscow, Russia. Demographic Research, 2012, 26:131-150. 16. Benavides F, Zímmermann-Verdejo M, Campos-Serna J, Carmenate J, Carmenate L, Báez I, Nogareda C, Molinero Ruiz E, Losilla Vidal J, Pinilla García F: Conjunto mínimo básico de ítems para el diseño de cuestionarios sobre condiciones de trabajo y salud. Arch Prev Riesg Labor 2010, 13:13-22. 17. Moullan Y, Jusot F: Why is the 'healthy immigrant effect' different between European countries? Eur J Public Health 2014, 24 Suppl 1:80-86. 18. Kroenke K, Spitzer R, W W: The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. JGIM. 2001, 16:606-616. 19. Martin A, Rief W, Klaiberg A, Braehler E: Validity of the Brief Patient Health Questionnaire Mood Scale (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2006, 28:71-77. 20. Maske UE, Busch MA, Jacobi F, Beesdo-Baum K, Seiffert I, Wittchen HU, Riedel-Heller S, Hapke U: Current major depressive syndrome measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): results from a cross-sectional population-based study of adults in Germany. BMC Psychiatry 2015, 15:77. 21. Coutinho L, Scazufca M, Menezes P: Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in crosssectional studies. Rev Saúde Pública 2008, 42. 22. Behrens T, Taeger D, Wellmann J, Keil U: Different methods to calculate effect estimates in cross-sectional studies. A comparison between prevalence odds ratio and prevalence ratio. Methods Inf Med 2004, 43:505-509. 23. Caregiving benefits and leave - Canada.ca [Internet] Government of Canada "Employment Canada" 2019 [cited 01August 2019]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/ei/caregiving.html. 24. Vahabi M, Pui‑Hing Wong J, Lofters A: Migrant Live-in Caregivers Mental Health in Canada. Community Mental Health Journal 2018, 54:590–599 25. Carlos J, Wilson K: Migration among temporary foreign workers: Examining health and access to health care among Filipina live-in caregivers Social Science & Medicine 2018, 209:117-124. 26. Spitzer D.L, Bitar S, Kalbach M, Bernardino C, Pereira I.I: In the Shadows: Live-in Caregivers in Alberta. . Changing Together, A Centre for Immigrant Women, Edmonton 2002. 27. Bundesagentur für Arbeit: "Au-pair" bei deutschen Familien. 2014. 28. Kaplan M. S, Marks G: Adverse effects of acculturation: Psychological distress among Mexican American young adults. Social Science and Medicine 1990, 31:1313-1319. 29. Wu Z, Schimmele C: The Healthy Migrant Effect on Depression: Variation over Time? Canadian Studies in Population 2005, 32:271-295. 30. Göritz A: Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review. International Journal of Internet Science 2006, 1 (1):58-70 31. Monge S, Ronda E, Pons-Vigues M, Vives Cases C, Malmusi D, Gil-Gonzalez D: [Methodological limitations and recommendations in publications on migrant population health in Spain]. Gac Sanit 2015, 29:461-463. 32. Schenker MB: Migration and occupational health: Shining a light on the problem. American journal of industrial medicine 2010, 53(4):327-328. 33. Zocchetti C, Consonni D, Bertazzi PA: Relationship between prevalence rate ratios and odds ratios in cross-sectional studies. Int J Epidemiol 1997, 26:3. 34. Petersen MR, Deddens JA: A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008, 8:9. 35. Ehrbar J, Brand S, Colledge F, Donath L, Egger ST, Hatzinger M, Holsboer-Trachsler E, Imboden C, Schweinfurth N, Vetter S, Gerber M: Psychiatric In-Patients Are More Likely to Meet Recommended Levels of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity If They Engage in Exercise and Sport Therapy Programs. Frontiers in psychiatry 2018, 9:322-322. 36. Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS: Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 2016, 5:1-4. 37. Da Silva AT, Peres MF, Lopes Cde S, Schraiber LB, Susser E, Menezes PR: Violence at work and depressive symptoms in primary health care teams: a cross-sectional study in Brazil. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2015, 50:1347-1355. |
- Dokument bearbeiten
