The recipient passive in the history of English


Kaltenbach, Lena


[img]
Vorschau
PDF
77-Article Text-306-2-10-20200129.pdf - Veröffentlichte Version

Download (204kB)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25521/mapmac.2020.77
URL: https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/53765
Weitere URL: https://majournals.bib.uni-mannheim.de/mapmac/arti...
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-537651
Dokumenttyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Erscheinungsjahr: 2020
Titel einer Zeitschrift oder einer Reihe: Mannheim Papers in Multilingualism, Acquisition and Change
Band/Volume: 1
Heft/Issue: Student Edition
Seitenbereich: 73-112
Ort der Veröffentlichung: Mannheim
Verlag: Universität, LS Anglistik/Linguistik (Diachronie)
Sprache der Veröffentlichung: Englisch
Einrichtung: Philosophische Fakultät > Anglistik IV - Anglistische Linguistik/Diachronie (Trips 2006-)
Lizenz: CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Fachgebiet: 400 Sprache, Linguistik
Abstract: Considerable attention has been paid to formal and functional aspects of the recipient passive (e.g. Mary/Sheis given a book) whereas its emergence during the 14thcentury has received little attention in the literature to date. This study seeks to explore its semantic and syntactic characteristics based on shared features of verb classes. It also considers potential influence of language contact in the form of the borrowing of Anglo-Norman verbs including their argument structure into Middle English. For a set of Modern English ditransitive verbs, the ability to signify a caused possession event type by selecting for a true recipient argument is identified as the necessary condition. A corpus analysis of two native and three French origin verbs from two Middle English corpora, PPCME2 (Kroch & Taylor, 2000)and PCEEC (Taylor, Nurmi, Warner, Pintzuk, & Nevalainen, 2006), reveals the set of verbs which can form recipient passives as historically stable with regard to event type and semantic roles. By tendency, the verbs form recipient passives as soon as the choice between expressing the recipientargument as either a prepositional phrase or a bare noun phrase becomes available. Native verbs lag behind non-native verbs. This tendency supports recent assumptions about borrowing of argument structure (Trips & Stein, 2019) and differences in argument realisation options across languages (Hovav & Levin, 2008).




Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.

Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.




Metadaten-Export


Zitation


+ Suche Autoren in

+ Download-Statistik

Downloads im letzten Jahr

Detaillierte Angaben



Sie haben einen Fehler gefunden? Teilen Sie uns Ihren Korrekturwunsch bitte hier mit: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Eintrag anzeigen Eintrag anzeigen