In a recent QJE-article, Gneezy and Potters (1997) present experimental evidence for the impact of feedback frequency on individual risk taking behavior in repeated investment decisions. They find an increased willingness to invest into a risky asset if less frequent feedback about the outcome of previous investments is provided. The observed decision pattern is explained by myopic loss aversion, a combination of mental accounting and loss aversion. In this note, we argue that the findings of Gneezy and Potters on the relationship between feedback frequency and risk taking are not as general as they might seem. We provide theoretical arguments and experimental evidence to demonstrate that the reported phenomenon is not robust to changes in the risk profiles of the given investment options.
Zusätzliche Informationen:
Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.
Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.
![[img]](https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
Suche Autoren in