Skip to main content
Log in

Ability of family members to predict patient's consent to critical care research

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

A European Union Directive provides for the designation of a surrogate who can consent to or refuse inclusion of an incapacitated patient in research studies. The accuracy with which surrogates consent to research on behalf of patients has not been evaluated in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

A prospective multicenter study was conducted in ten ICUs of the French Famirea study group between July and October 2004. Two hypothetical studies were simultaneously submitted to the patient, surrogate, and physician at the time that the patient was discharged to a ward. One study involved minimal risk and the other greater-than-minimal risk to the patients.

Results

With the minimal risk study there was patient-surrogate discrepancy in 32% of cases and patient-physician discrepancy in 25%. Corresponding figures with the greater-than-minimal risk study were 42% and 46%. None of the collected variables differed significantly between cases with and without patient-surrogate discrepancy.

Conclusions

Family members designated to serve as surrogate decision makers may fail to accurately consent to research for critically ill patients in one-third to nearly one-half of cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luce JM, Cook DJ, Martin TR, Angus DC, Boushey HA, Curtis JR, Heffner JE, Lanken PN, Levy MM, Polite PY, Rocker GM, Truog RD (2004) The ethical conduct of clinical research involving critically ill patients in the United States and Canada: principles and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170:1375–1384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Silverman HJ, Druml C, Lemaire F, Nelson R (2004) The European Union directive and the protection of incapacitated subjects in research: an ethical analysis. Intensive Care Med 30:1723–1729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C (2000) What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283:2701–2711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemaire F, Bion J, Blanco J, Damas P, Druml C, Falke K, Kesecioglu J, Larsson A, Mancebo J, Matamis D, Pesenti A, Pimentel J, Ranieri M (2005) The European Union directive on clinical research: present status of implementation in EU member states' legislations with regard to the incompetent patient Intensive. Care Med 31:476–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Adrie C, Bollaert PE, Brun F, Dreyfuss D, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Goldgran-Toledano D, Jourdain M, Wolff M, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B (2003) Opinions about surrogate designation: a population survey in France. Crit Care Med 31:1711–1714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arnold RM, Kellum J (2003) Moral justifications for surrogate decision making in the intensive care unit: implications and limitations. Crit Care Med 31:S347–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coppolino M, Ackerson L (2001) Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research? Chest 119:603–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luce JM (2003) Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients? Crit Care Med 31:S153–S160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bigatello LM, George E, Hurford WE (2003) Ethical considerations for research in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 31:S178–S181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liddell K, Bion J, Chamberlain D, Druml C, Kompanje E, Lemaire F, Menon D, Vrhovac B, Wiedermann CJ (2006) Medical research involving incapacitated adults: implications of the EU clinical trials directive 2001/20/EC. Med Law Rev 23:23

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silverman HJ, Luce JM, Lanken PN, Morris AH, Harabin AL, Oldmixon CF, Thompson BT, Bernard GR (2005) Recommendations for informed consent forms for critical care clinical trials. Crit Care Med 33:867–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, Pochard F, Barboteu M, Adrie C, Canoui P, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B (2000) Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med 28:3044–3049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Jourdain M, Bornstain C, Wernet A, Cattaneo I, Annane D, Brun F, Bollaert PE, Zahar JR, Goldgran-Toledano D, Adrie C, Joly LM, Tayoro J, Desmettre T, Pigne E, Parrot A, Sanchez O, Poisson C, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B, Lemaire F (2002) Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:438–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lilly CM, De Meo DL, Sonna LA, Haley KJ, Massaro AF, Wallace RF, Cody S (2000) An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med 109:469–475

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis N, Pohlman A, Gehlbach B, Kress JP, McAtee J, Herlitz J, Hall J (2003) Improving the process of informed consent in the critically ill. JAMA 289:1963–1968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Silverman HJ, Luce JM, Schwartz J (2004) Protecting subjects with decisional impairment in research: the need for a multifaceted approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169:10–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C, Annane D, Bleichner G, Bollaert PE, Darmon M, Fassier T, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Goulenok C, Goldgran-Toledano D, Hayon J, Jourdain M, Kaidomar M, Laplace C, Larche J, Liotier J, Papazian L, Poisson C, Reignier J, Saidi F, Schlemmer B (2005) Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171:987–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pochard F, Darmon M, Fassier T, Bollaert PE, Cheval C, Coloigner M, Merouani A, Moulront S, Pigne E, Pingat J, Zahar JR, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E (2005) Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients before discharge or death. A prospective multicenter study. J Crit Care 20:90–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Adrie C, Annane D, Bleichner G, Bornstain C, Bouffard Y, Cohen Y, Feissel M, Goldgran-Toledano D, Guitton C, Hayon J, Iglesias E, Joly LM, Jourdain M, Laplace C, Lebert C, Pingat J, Poisson C, Renault A, Sanchez O, Selcer D, Timsit JF, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B (2004) Half the family members of intensive care unit patients do not want to share in the decision-making process: a study in 78 French intensive care units. Crit Care Med 32:1832–1838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blixen CE, Agich GJ (2005) Stroke patients' preferences and values about emergency research. J Med Ethics 31:608–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chenaud C, Merlani P, Ricou B (2006) Informed consent for research in ICU obtained before ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 32:439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dreyfuss D (2005) Is it better to consent to an RCT or to care? Muetadeltaepsilonnu alphagammaalphanu (“nothing in excess”). Intensive Care Med 31:345–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Truog RD, Robinson W, Randolph A, Morris A (1999) Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? N Engl J Med 340:804–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lemaire F (2006) Do all types of human research need ethics committee approval? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174:363–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Silverman HJ, Lemaire F (2006) Ethics and research in critical care. Intensive Care Med 32:1697–1705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Hubert P, Canoui P, Grassin M, Zittoun R, le Gall JR, Dhainaut JF, Schlemmer B (2001) Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Crit Care Med 29:1893–1897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moreau D, Goldgran-Toledano D, Alberti C, Jourdain M, Adrie C, Annane D, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Lefrant JY, Papazian L, Quinio P, Pochard F, Azoulay E (2004) Junior versus senior physicians for informing families of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169:512–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Farewell V, Saul J, Duffy A, Eves R (2002) Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:650–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Solis-Trapala I, Langridge C, Farewell V (2005) Discussing randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy: evaluation of a cancer research UK training programme. BMJ 330:400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elie Azoulay.

Additional information

This study was performed on behalf of the Famirea study group. It was supported by grants from the Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris and the French Society for Critical Care Medicine (AOR01004).

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ciroldi, M., Cariou, A., Adrie, C. et al. Ability of family members to predict patient's consent to critical care research. Intensive Care Med 33, 807–813 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0582-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0582-6

Keywords

Navigation