Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pathology of stent implantation in internal mammary artery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The internal mammary artery (IMA) is the most durable conduit for bypassing the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, little is known about how the IMA reacts histologically to stent implantation. From CVPath stent registry (1048 lesions, 614 cases), we obtained 4 stent lesions (2 bare metal stents, 2 drug-eluting stents) involving IMA grafts. The mean age of our patients was 63 years and the duration of stent implantation in the IMA ranged from 5 days to 5 years. Stented arteries were dissected from hearts and embedded in plastic, segmented at 3 mm intervals, sectioned at 4–6 microns and stained with H&E and Movat pentachrome stains. Histological observations were performed. Majority of stents (3 of 4) were implanted in anastomosis between IMA and LAD while 1 stent was implanted in IMA body. One stent with duration of 5 days showed stent thrombosis while others were all patent with fully coverage by varying degrees of neointima. Foamy macrophage, lipid pool and calcification in neointima were observed in 1 stent with duration of 5 years but it was limited only to the distal LAD part within the stented segment. Overall, in this small pathologic series, the majorities of stents were implanted in IMA-to-LAD anastomosis site and demonstrated acceptable pathologic responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124(23):e652–735.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khot UN, Friedman DT, Pettersson G, Smedira NG, Li J, Ellis SG. Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts. Circulation. 2004;109(17):2086–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, Ovitt T, Sethi G, Copeland JG, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(11):2149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Etienne PY, D’hoore W, Papadatos S, Mairy Y, El Khoury G, Noirhomme P, et al. Five-year follow-up of drug-eluting stents implantation vs minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery disease: a propensity score analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44(5):884–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(4):217–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Serruys PW, Morice M-C, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(10):961–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bangalore S, Guo Y, Samadashvili Z, Blecker S, Hannan EL. Revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction: everolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2016;133(22):2132–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yahagi K, Kolodgie FD, Otsuka F, Finn AV, Davis HR, Joner M, et al. Pathophysiology of native coronary, vein graft, and in-stent atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13(2):79–98 (Nature Publishing Group).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Vorpahl M, Ladich E, Kutys R, Balazs I, et al. Incidence and predictors of drug-eluting stent fracture in human coronary artery a pathologic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(21):1924–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lutter C, Mori H, Yahagi K, Ladich E, Joner M, Kutys R, et al. Histopathological differential diagnosis of optical coherence tomographic image interpretation after stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(24):2511–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Otsuka F, Byrne RA, Yahagi K, Mori H, Ladich E, Fowler DR, et al. Neoatherosclerosis: overview of histopathologic findings and implications for intravascular imaging assessment. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(32):2147–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Otsuka F, Yahagi K, Sakakura K, Virmani R. Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(4):519–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. He G-W, Fan L, Grove KL, Furnary A, Yang Q. Expression and function of endothelial nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA and protein are higher in internal mammary than in radial arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(3):845–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harskamp RE, Alexander JH, Ferguson TB, Hager R, Mack MJ, Englum B, et al. Frequency and predictors of internal mammary artery graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes: insights from the Project of Ex-vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection (PREVENT) IV Trial. Circulation. 2016;133(2):131–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shiono Y, Kubo T, Honda K, Katayama Y, Aoki H, Satogami K, et al. Impact of functional focal versus diffuse coronary artery disease on bypass graft patency. Int J Cardiol. 2016;11(222):16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aggarwal V, Stanislawski MA, Maddox TM, Nallamothu BK, Grunwald G, Adams JC, et al. Safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein bypass graft percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the Veterans Affairs CART program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(17):1825–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gruberg L, Dangas G, Mehran R, Hong MK, Waksman R, Mintz GS, et al. Percutaneous revascularization of the internal mammary artery graft: short- and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(4):944–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lozano I, Serrador A, Lopez-Palop R, Lasa G, Moreu J, Pinar E, et al. Immediate and long-term results of drug-eluting stents in mammary artery grafts. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(11):1695–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yazdani SK, Farb A, Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Ladich E, Finn AV, et al. Pathology of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(6):666–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Talbot Mayo and David Kamerow for the support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA

    Hiroyoshi Mori, Ryan Braumann, Sho Torii, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Emanuel Harari, Robert Kutys, Maria Romero, Renu Virmani & Aloke Finn

  2. University of Maryland, College Park, USA

    Aloke Finn

Authors
  1. Hiroyoshi Mori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryan Braumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sho Torii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hiroyuki Jinnouchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emanuel Harari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Robert Kutys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maria Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Renu Virmani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Aloke Finn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aloke Finn.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The study was sponsored by CVPath Institute, a non-profit organization dedicated cardiovascular research. There was no industry involvement in the design, conduct, financial support, or analysis of this study.

Conflict of interest

CVPath Institute has research Grants from Abbott Vascular, Atrium Medical, Boston Scientific, Biosensors International, Cordis-Johnson&Johnson, Medtronic CardioVascular, OrbusNeich Medical and Terumo Corporation. H. M has received honorarium from Abbott Vascular Japan, Goodman and Terumo Corporation. S. T has received honorarium from Abbott Vascular Japan, Terumo Corporation and SUNRISE lab. R. V has speaking engagements with Merck; receives honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Lutonix, Medtronic and Terumo Corporation and is a consultant for 480 Biomedical, Abbott Vascular, Medtronic and W. L. Gore. A. V. Finn has sponsored research agreements with Boston Scientific and Medtronic CardioVascular and is an advisory board member to Medtronic CardioVascular. The other authors report no conflict.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mori, H., Braumann, R., Torii, S. et al. Pathology of stent implantation in internal mammary artery. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 34, 1–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-017-0504-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-017-0504-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation