Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk stratification of gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography and texture analysis

  • Gastrointestinal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess important features for risk stratification of gallbladder (GB) polyps >10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) and texture analysis.

Methods

We included 136 patients with GB polyps (>10 mm) who underwent both HRUS and cholecystectomy (non-neoplastic, n = 58; adenomatous, n = 32; and carcinoma, n = 46). Two radiologists retrospectively assessed HRUS findings and texture analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors for neoplastic polyps and carcinomas.

Results

Single polyp (OR, 3.680–3.856) and larger size (OR, 1.450–1.477) were independently associated with neoplastic polyps (p < 0.05). In a single or polyp >14 mm, sensitivity for differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps was 92.3%. To differentiate carcinoma from adenoma, sessile shape (OR, 9.485–41.257), larger size (OR, 1.267–1.303), higher skewness (OR, 6.382) and lower grey-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM) contrast (OR, 0.963) were significant predictors (p < 0.05). In a polyp >22 mm or sessile, sensitivity for differentiating carcinomas from adenomas was 93.5–95.7%. If a polyp demonstrated at least one HRUS finding and at least one texture feature, the specificity for diagnosing carcinoma was increased to 90.6–93.8%.

Conclusion

In a GB polyp >10 mm, single and diameter >14 mm were useful for predicting neoplastic polyps. In neoplastic polyps, sessile shape, diameter >22 mm, higher skewness and lower GLCM contrast were useful for predicting carcinoma.

Key Points

• Risk of neoplastic polyp is low in <14 mm and multiple polyps

• A sessile polyp or >22 mm has increased risk for GB carcinomas

• Higher skewness and lower GLCM contrast are predictors of GB carcinoma

• HRUS is useful for risk stratification of GB polyps >1 cm

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen CY, Lu CL, Chang FY, Lee SD (1997) Risk factors for gallbladder polyps in the Chinese population. Am J Gastroenterol 92:2066–2068

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jorgensen T, Jensen KH (1990) Polyps in the gallbladder. A prevalence study. Scand J Gastroenterol 25:281–286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mellnick VM, Menias CO, Sandrasegaran K et al (2015) Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: disease spectrum with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 35:387–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatt NR, Gillis A, Smoothey CO, Awan FN, Ridgway PF (2016) Evidence based management of polyps of the gall bladder: a systematic review of the risk factors of malignancy. Surgeon 14:278–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Babu BI, Dennison AR, Garcea G (2015) Management and diagnosis of gallbladder polyps: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:455–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jang JY, Kim SW, Lee SE et al (2009) Differential diagnostic and staging accuracies of high resolution ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and multidetector computed tomography for gallbladder polypoid lesions and gallbladder cancer. Ann Surg 250:943–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JH, Lee JY, Baek JH et al (2015) High-resolution sonography for distinguishing neoplastic gallbladder polyps and staging gallbladder cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W150–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M (1994) Polypoid lesion of the gallbladder: indications of carcinoma and outcome after surgery for malignant polypoid lesion. Int Surg 79:106–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang HL, Sun YG, Wang Z (1992) Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: diagnosis and indications for surgery. Br J Surg 79:227–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mainprize KS, Gould SW, Gilbert JM (2000) Surgical management of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Br J Surg 87:414–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Terzi C, Sokmen S, Seckin S, Albayrak L, Ugurlu M (2000) Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: report of 100 cases with special reference to operative indications. Surgery 127:622–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koga A, Watanabe K, Fukuyama T, Takiguchi S, Nakayama F (1988) Diagnosis and operative indications for polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Arch Surg 123:26–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park HY, Oh SH, Lee KH, Lee JK, Lee KT (2015) Is cholecystectomy a reasonable treatment option for simple gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm? World J Gastroenterol 21:4248–4254

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim JS, Lee JK, Kim Y, Lee SM (2016) US characteristics for the prediction of neoplasm in gallbladder polyps 10 mm or larger. Eur Radiol 26:1134–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho JH, Park JY, Kim YJ et al (2009) Hypoechoic foci on EUS are simple and strong predictive factors for neoplastic gallbladder polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 69:1244–1250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Joo I, Lee JY, Kim JH et al (2013) Differentiation of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder from early-stage, wall-thickening-type gallbladder cancer using high-resolution ultrasound. Eur Radiol 23:730–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ganeshan B, Miles KA (2013) Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT. Cancer Imaging 13:140–149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Davnall F, Yip CS, Ljungqvist G et al (2012) Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? Insights Imaging 3:573–589

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Holli K, Laaperi AL, Harrison L et al (2010) Characterisation of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images. Acad Radiol 17:135–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryu YJ, Choi SH, Park SJ, Yun TJ, Kim JH, Sohn CH (2014) Glioma: application of whole-tumor texture analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging for the evaluation of tumor heterogeneity. PLoS One 9:e108335

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chae HD, Park CM, Park SJ, Lee SM, Kim KG, Goo JM (2014) Computerised texture analysis of persistent part-solid ground-glass nodules: differentiation of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Radiology 273:285–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wibmer A, Hricak H, Gondo T et al (2015) Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores. Eur Radiol 25:2840–2850

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Haralick RM (1979) Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 67:786–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Albores-Saavedra J, Chable-Montero F, Gonzalez-Romo MA, Ramirez Jaramillo M, Henson DE (2012) Adenomas of the gallbladder. Morphologic features, expression of gastric and intestinal mucins, and incidence of high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma. Hum Pathol 43:1506–1513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trivedi V, Gumaste VV, Liu S, Baum J (2008) Gallbladder cancer: adenoma-carcinoma or dysplasia-carcinoma sequence? Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 4:735–737

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roa I, de Aretxabala X, Araya JC, Roa J (2006) Preneoplastic lesions in gallbladder cancer. J Surg Oncol 93:615–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cha BH, Hwang JH, Lee SH et al (2011) Pre-operative factors that can predict neoplastic polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. World J Gastroenterol 17:2216–2222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun XJ, Shi JS, Han Y, Wang JS, Ren H (2004) Diagnosis and treatment of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: report of 194 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 3:591–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shinkai H, Kimura W, Muto T (1998) Surgical indications for small polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Am J Surg 175:114–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park JY, Hong SP, Kim YJ et al (2009) Long-term follow up of gallbladder polyps. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:219–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Yamato T (2000) Endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of polypoid gall bladder lesions: analysis in surgical and follow up series. Gut 46:250–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Azuma T, Yoshikawa T, Araida T, Takasaki K (2001) Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder by endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Surg 181:65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee JS, Kim JH, Kim YJ et al (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal high-resolution US for staging gallbladder cancer and differential diagnosis of neoplastic polyps compared with EUS. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4646-2

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yuan HX, Cao JY, Kong WT, Xia HS, Wang X, Wang WP (2015) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of gallbladder adenoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 14:201–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Konno N et al (2016) The efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing gallbladder cancer. Sci Rep 6:25848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Choi JH, Seo DW, Choi JH et al (2013) Utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS in the diagnosis of malignant gallbladder polyps (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 78:484–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We also thank Bonnie Hami, M.A. (USA) for her editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea

    Tae Won Choi, Jung Hoon Kim, Sang Joon Park, Su Joa Ahn, Ijin Joo & Joon Koo Han

  2. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Jung Hoon Kim & Joon Koo Han

Authors
  1. Tae Won Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jung Hoon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sang Joon Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Su Joa Ahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ijin Joo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joon Koo Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung Hoon Kim.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Joon Koo Han, M.D.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Statistics and biometry

Tae Won Choi MD has significant statistical expertise and no complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was obtained (IRB No. 1608-144-787).

Informed consent

This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, and patient informed consent was waived.

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Diagnostic study

• Performed at one institution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, T.W., Kim, J.H., Park, S.J. et al. Risk stratification of gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography and texture analysis. Eur Radiol 28, 196–205 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4954-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4954-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation