Skip to main content
Log in

An intra- and interrater reliability and agreement study of vaginal resting pressure, pelvic floor muscle strength, and muscular endurance using a manometer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Manometry is commonly used to assess pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. Aims of the study were to assess intra- and interrater reliability and agreement of vaginal resting pressure, PFM strength, and muscular endurance using a high-precision pressure transducer.

Methods

A convenient sample of 23 women was included. The participants were tested twice by two examiners on day 1 and retested after 1 week by one examiner. Vaginal resting pressure, PFM strength, and muscular endurance were measured by manometer (Camtech AS). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots were used to analyze reliability and agreement respectively. Results are presented with mean differences (bias) and minimal detectable change.

Results

Twenty participants completed the tests (mean age 55.8 years [27–71], mean parity 1.7 [range 0–3], and mean body mass index 23.7 [range 18.4–27.2, SD 2.4]). ICC values were very good (ICC >0.90) for all measurements. Considerable intervariation of scores, and outliers were seen for measurements representing the highest values. Agreement with mean differences (bias) and minimal detectable change for the intrarater assessment was for vaginal resting pressure: −2.44 ± 8.7 cmH2O, for PFM strength −0.22 ± 7.6 cmH2O, and for muscular endurance 0.75 ± 59.5 cmH2O/s. The interrater agreement for vaginal resting pressure was: 1.36 ± 9.0 cmH2O, for PFM strength 2.24 ± 9.0 cmH2O, and for muscular endurance 15.89 ± 69.7 cmH2O/s.

Conclusions

Manometry (Camtech AS) seems less accurate for the strongest women. In clinical practice, significant improvement in PFM variables needs to exceed the minimal detectable change to be above the error of measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kegel AH. Stress incontinence and genital relaxation; a nonsurgical method of increasing the tone of sphincters and their supporting structures. Ciba Clin Symp. 1952;4:35–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JOL. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. In: Bø K, Berghmans B, Mørkved S, Van Kampen M, editors. Evidence-based physical therapy for the pelvic floor bridging science and clinical practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2015. p. 19–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, Bo K, Corcos J, Fowler C, et al. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:374–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bø K, Sherburn M. Evaluation of female pelvic-floor muscle function and strength. Phys Ther. 2005;85:269–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sigurdardottir T, Steingrimsdottir T, Arnason A, Bø K. Test-retest intra-rater reliability of vaginal measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength using myomed 932. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:939–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frawley HC, Galea MP, Phillips BA, Sherburn M, Bø K. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25:236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreira CH, Barbosa PB, de Oliveira SF, Antonio FI, Franco MM, Bø K. Inter-rater reliability study of the modified Oxford Grading Scale and the Peritron manometer. Physiotherapy. 2011;97:132–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bø K, Raastad R, Finckenhagen HB. Does the size of the vaginal probe affect measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:129–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brækken IH, Majida M, Engh ME, Bø K. Can pelvic floor muscle training reverse pelvic organ prolapse and reduce prolapse symptoms? An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:170.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bø K, Talseth T, Holme I. Single blind, randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones, and no treatment in management of genuine stress incontinence in women. BMJ. 1999;318:487–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bø K, Hagen RH, Kvarstein B, Jørgensen J, Larsen S. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. III. Effects of two different degrees of pelvic floor muscle exercises. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9:489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Staer-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Engh ME, Bo K. Coital incontinence and vaginal symptoms and the relationship to pelvic floor muscle function in primiparous women at 12 months postpartum: a cross-sectional study. J Sex Med. 2015;12:994–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Næss I, Bø K. Pelvic floor muscle function in women with provoked vestibulodynia and asymptomatic controls. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1467–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bø K, Hagen R, Kvarstein B, Larsen S. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: I. Reliability of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic muscle strength. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9:471–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bø K, Hagen RR, Kvarstein B, Larsen S. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9:479–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. WMA. Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects Fortaleza Brazil 2013. Accessed 30 September.2016. Available from: www.wma.net/en/30/publictions/10policies/b3/.

  17. Kottner JA, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hròbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48:661–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bø K. Pressure measurements during pelvic floor muscle contractions: the effect of different positions of the vaginal measuring device. Neurourol Urodyn. 1992;11:107–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Physiology of sport and exercise. 2nd ed. Leeds: Human Kinetics; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Åstrand PO, Rodahl K, Dahl HA. Textbook of work physiology; physiological basis of exercise. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26:217–38.

  23. Guaderrama NM, Nager CW, Liu J, Pretorius DH, Mittal RK. The vaginal pressure profile. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:243–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dumoulin C, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D, Lemieux MC, Morin M. Reliability of dynamometric measurements of the pelvic floor musculature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:134–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morin M, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D, Dumoulin C, Ouellet S. Reliability of dynamometric passive properties of the pelvic floor muscles in postmenopausal women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:819–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vodusek DB. Electromyography. In: Bø K, Berghmans B, Mørkved S, Van Kampen M, editors. Evidence based physical therapy for the pelvic floor bridging science and clinical practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2007. p. 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Stær-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Ellström Engh M, Bø K. Effect of postpartum pelvic floor muscle training on vaginal symptoms and sexual dysfunction—secondary analysis of a randomised trial. BJOG. 2016;123:634–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De Vet HCV, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, editors. Measurement in medicine a practical guide. United States of America: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bø K, Finckenhagen HB. Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:883–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank physical therapist Vigdis Skøld for participating in data collection, physical therapist Hilde Løset Myrvang and Vest Helse for help with recruitment and location, Professor Ingar Holme (PhD) and Morten Wang Fagerland (PhD) for valuable statistical advice, and medical doctor Franziska Siafarikas (PhD) for valuable discussions and advice on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merete Kolberg Tennfjord.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimer

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding

This project has been made possible by the Norwegian ExtraFoundation for Health and Rehabilitation and the Norwegian Women’s Public Health Association.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tennfjord, M.K., Engh, M.E. & Bø, K. An intra- and interrater reliability and agreement study of vaginal resting pressure, pelvic floor muscle strength, and muscular endurance using a manometer. Int Urogynecol J 28, 1507–1514 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3290-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3290-y

Keywords

Navigation