Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of Electroencephalogram Spectral Characteristics during Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients with Refractory Depression

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Objective. To study the dynamics of EEG spectral characteristics during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in therapeutically refractory depression. Materials and methods. The study included 32 patients with depression in the framework of recurrent depressive and bipolar affective disorders. TMS was performed and EEG recordings made on the background of ineffective thymoanaleptic treatment at reduced doses. TMS was applied at the projection of the left prefrontal cortex. Treatment courses consisted of 15 sessions with 100% threshold intensity. In each session, patients received 20 cycles of stimuli at a frequency of 15 Hz, duration 6 sec, separated by intervals of 60 sec. EEG recordings were made using a Neiro-KM instrument (Russian-made) with a bandpass of 0.5–45 Hz and a time constant of 0.3 sec before and after courses of TMS. EEG spectral analysis was by fast Fourier transformation with averaging of at least 30 2-sec epochs followed by mapping using the Brainsys system (made in Russia). Results and conclusions. Post-TMS EEG changes were generalized in nature and involved rearrangement of all frequency ranges in brain electrical activity. However, the greatest changes were seen at the α rhythm frequencies: the index increased in all cortical zones, though the greatest increase in α activity was seen in the occipital areas of the cortex, forming an α rhythm focus in these zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. George, T. Schlaepfer, et al., “Brain stimulation treatments for depression,” World J. Biol. Psychiatry, 15, 167–168 (2014); doi: 10.3109/15622975.2013.869619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Burt, S. Lisanby, and H. Sackeim, “Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation,” Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol., 5, No. 1, 73–103 (2002); doi: 10.1017/s1461145702002791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. E. E. Tsukarzi, “Current methods in brain stimulation: progress and potential,” Sots. Klin. Psikhiatr., 23, No. 1, 93–99 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. A. Il’in, E. E. Tsukarzi, and S. N. Mosolov, “Comparative efficacy and tolerability of cyclic transcranial magnetic stimulation and ECT in protracted therapeutically resistant depression,” Sots. Klin. Psikhiatr., No. 2, 73–80 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. G. Kapiletti, T. S. Mel’nikova, E. E. Tsukarzi, and S. N. Mosolov, “Dynamics of autonomic regulation in transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression,” Sots. Klin. Psikhiatr., No. 2, 72–75 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. V. Maslennikov, E. E. Tsukarzi, and S. N. Mosolov, “Depression in schizophrenia: assessment of cognitive functions during treatment with transcranial magnetic stimulation,” Sots. Klin. Psikhiatr., 23, No. 1, 5–11 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. V. Maslennikov, E. E. Tsukarzi, and S. N. Mosolov, “Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in depression in patients with schizophrenia,” Obozr. Psikhiatr. Med. Psikhol., 4 (2009).

  8. S. G. Kapiletti, E. E. Tsukarzi, and S. N. Mosolov, “Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorders,” Sots. Klin. Psikhiatr., No. 1, 42–47 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. D. Pugovkina, E. E. Tsukarzi, A. B. Kholmogorova, and S. N. Mosolov, “Dynamics of cognitive functions in patients with refractory depression using electroconvulsive therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation,” Sots. Klin. Psikhiatr., No. 2, 47–52 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Avery, K. Isenberg, S. Sampson, et al., “Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: clinical response in an open-label extension trial,” J. Clin. Psychiatry, 69, No. 3, 441–451 (2008); doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Belmaker, P. Fitzgerald, et al., “Managing the risks of repetitive transcranial stimulation,” CNS Spectr., 8, No. 7, 89 (2003).

  12. N. V. Maslennikov, E. E. Tsukarzi, and S. N. Molotov, “Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression and negative symptomatology in schizophrenia,” Psikh. Zdorov., No. 1, 39–44 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. V. Potapov, E. E. Tsukarzi, and S. N. Mosolov, “Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in refractory verbal hallucinations,” Obozr. Psikhiatr. Med. Psikhol., No. 1, 23–34 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Di Lazzaro U. Ziemann, and R. Lemon, “State of the art: Physiology of transcranial motor cortex stimulation,” in: Brain Stimu lation: Basic, Translational and Clinical Research in Neuromo dulation, 1, No. 4, 345–362 (2008); doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.07.004.

  15. E. Higgins and M. George, Brain Stimulation Therapies for Clinicians, American Psychiatric Press, Washington (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Hoffman and I. Cavus, “Slow transcranial magnetic stimulation, long-term depotentiation, and brain hyperexcitability disorders,” Am. J. Psychiatry, 159, No. 7, 1093–1102 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Nahas, C. Teneback, A. Kozel, et al., “Brain effects of TMS delivered over prefrontal cortex in depressed adults: role of stimulation frequency and coil-cortex distance,” J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci., 13, No. 4, 459–470 (2001); doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.4.459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Pascual-Leone, J. Gates, and A. Dhuna, “Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation,” Neurology, 41, 697–702 (1991); doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Szuba, J. O’Reardon, and D. Evans, “Physiological effects of electroconvulsive therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression,” Depress. Anxiety, 12, No. 3, 170–177 (2000); doi: 10.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:3<170::aid-da9>3.0.co;2-m.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. U. Ziemann, W. Paulus, M. Nitsche, et al., “Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols,” in: Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation, 1, No. 3, 164–182 (2008); doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.006.

  21. T. S. Mel’nikova and I. A. Lapin, “EEG coherence analysis in depressive disorders of different origins,” Sots. Klin. Psikhiatr., No. 3, 27–32 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. E. Sviderskaya, Synchronous Electrical Activity of the Brain and Mental Processes, Nauka, Moscow (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Herrman and T. Demiralp, “Human EEG gamma oscillations in neuropsychiatric disorders,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 116, No. 12, 2719–2733 (2005); doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Sauseng and W. Klimesch, “What does phase information of oscillatory brain activity tell us about cognitive processes?” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 32, 1001–1013 (2008); doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008. 03.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Von Stain and J. Sarnthein, “Different frequencies for different scale of cortical integration: from local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., No. 3, 301–314 (2000); doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00172-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N. N. Danilova, “The role of high-frequency rhythms in brain electrical activity in supporting mental processes,” Psikhol. Zh. VShE, 3, No. 2, 62–72 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. B. Ivanov, N. N. Strekalina, N. Yu. Chulkova, and A. V. Budkevich, “Variants of the spatial distribution of α activity depending on the type of affective disorder,” Funktsional. Diagn., No. 1, 41–49 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. M. Kamenskaya and E. S. Mikhailova, “Studies of the ratio of electroencephalographic and autonomic parameters in stress situations in patients with different types of depression,” Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiat., No. 9, 57–62 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. A. Fingelkurts, A. A. Fingelkurts, H. Rytsälä, et al., “Impaired functional connectivity at EEG alpha and theta frequency bands in major depression,” Hum. Brain Mapp., 28, No. 3, 247–261 (2007); doi: 10.1002/hbm.20275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. S. Mel’nikova.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S. S. Korsakova, Vol. 115, No. 8, Iss. I, pp. 35–41, August, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mel’nikova, T.S., Tsukarzi, E.E., Kovalev, A.V. et al. Dynamics of Electroencephalogram Spectral Characteristics during Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients with Refractory Depression. Neurosci Behav Physi 47, 281–287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0394-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0394-2

Keywords

Navigation