Skip to main content
Log in

A Method for Testing Food Preference in Animal Experiments

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article describes an original method for studying the physiological mechanisms of food preference. The method can be used to study the selective role of visual and orosensory food-related stimuli in the selection of the preferred food and to model the processes forming food and drug dependence in animal experiments. The role of fractional food reinforcement in the formation of ongoing motivation and food preference is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. V. Al’bertin, “Involvement of the dopamine-reactive system of the caudate nucleus in the regulation of operant conditioned reflexes with different levels of complexity,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 71, No. 1, 87–94 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. V. Al’bertin, “Involvement of the nucleus accumbens in forming spatial selection reactions in rats in a radial maze,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 88, No. 5, 545–552 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. V. Al’bertin, Patent No. 2520154 RF, “An apparatus for studying feeding behavior in animal experiments,” Byull. Izobret., No. 127 (2014).

  4. S. V. Al’bertin, “Effects of the reinforcement regime on food preference,” Donozol. Zdorov. Obraz Zhizni, 2, 85–89 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. V. Al’bertin, “Effects of reinforcement regime on the formation of food preference in rats,” in: Basic Sciences – Medicine, Belaruskaya Navuka, Minsk (2013), Pt. 1, pp. 28–32.

  6. S. V. Al’bertin and S. I. Wiener, “Neuronal activity in the nucleus accumbens and hippocampus in rats on formation of seeking behavior in a radial maze,” Byull. Eksperim. Biol. Med., 18, No. 10, 400–405 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. V. Albertin, A. B. Mulder, E. Tabuchi, et al., “Lesions of the medial shell of the nucleus accumbens impair rats in finding larger rewards but spare reward-seeking behavior,” Behav. Brain Res., 117, 173–183 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. E. J. Capaldi, D. J. Miller, and S. Alptekin, “Multiple-food-unit incentive effect: nonconservation of weight of food reward by rats,” J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Beh. Proc., 15, No. 1, 75–80 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. M. Dossat, N. Lilly, K. Kay, and D. L. Williams, “Glucagonlike peptide receptors in nucleus accumbens affect food intake,” J. Neurosci., 31, No. 41, 14,453–14,457 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. M. Eagle, T. Humby, M. Howman, et al., “Differential effects of ventral and regional dorsal striatal lesions on sucrose drinking and positive and negative contrast in rats,” Psychobiology, 27, No. 2, 267–276 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. P. Mark, S. E. Smith, P. V. Rada, and B. G. Hoebel, “An appetizingly conditioned taste elicits a preferential increase in mesolimbic dopamine release,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 48, 651–660 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. A. N. M. Schoffelmeer, B. Drukarch, T. J. De Vries, et al., “Insulin modulates cocaine sensitive monoamine transporter function and impulsive behavior,” J. Neurosci., 31, No. 4, 1284–1291 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Sclafani, K. Touzani, and R. J. Bodnar, “Dopamine and learned food preference,” Physiol. Behav., 104, 64–68 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. G. P. Smith, “Dopamine and food reward,” Prog. Neurobiol. Physiol. Psychol., 16, 83–144 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Q. Whishaw, S. D. Oddie, R. K. McNamara, et al., “Psychophy siological methods for study of sensory-motor behavior using a food-carrying task in rodents,” J. Neurosci. Meth., 32, 123–133 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Willner, M. Papp, G. Phillips, et al., “Pimozide does not impair sweetness discrimination,” Psychopharmacology, 102, No. 2, 272–282 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. C. Woods, R. J. Seeley, D. J. Bashkin, and W. D. Schwarz, “Signals that regulate food intake and energy homeostasis,” Science, 280, 1378–1383 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Al’bertin.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 101, No. 10, pp. 1128–1134, October, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al’bertin, S.V. A Method for Testing Food Preference in Animal Experiments. Neurosci Behav Physi 47, 307–310 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0398-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0398-y

Keywords

Navigation