Skip to main content
Log in

Net-Geners’ perceptions of engagement through online videos

  • Published:
Journal of Computers in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a contextual overview of Net Generation students at a rural university in a tropical Australian location. It then provides a discussion based on the interview responses of 11 students studying either Education or Psychology in relation to their perceptions concerning the contribution that digital videos make to their engagement with subjects. It was concluded that the students perceive that digital videos can make a substantial contribution to subject engagement if the videos are relevant, concise and interesting, and are supplemented with effective pedagogy and classroom interaction and discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angiello, R. (2010). Study looks at online learning vs. traditional instruction. The Education Digest, 76(2), 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont: Thomson Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2014). Household use of information technology, Australia, 2010–2011. Canberra, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/192B7AFC26FF3538CA25796600152BDF?opendocument

  • Baškarada, S. (2013). Qualitative case study guidelines. Fishermans Bend, Victoria: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2011). Research design and methods: A process approach (8th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T. (2008). Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. C. (2016). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2016. Louisville, CO: ECAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2008). Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Bryan, J., & Brown, T. (2005). Twenty-first century literacy and technology in K-8 Classrooms. Innovative, 1(3), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, P. H., & Patterson, G. C. (2017). Strategies to promote pedagogical knowledge interplay with technology. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Flipped instruction: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 30–47). USA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buzzetto-More, N. (2015). Student attitudes towards the integration of YouTube in online, hybrid, and web-assisted courses: An examination of the impact of course modality on perception. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 55–n/a.

  • Chua, B. L., & Chye, S. (2017). Nurturing Twenty-First century educators: An EPIIC perspective. In O.-S. Tan, W.-C. Liu, & E.-L. Low (Eds.), Teacher education in the 21st century: Singapore’s evolution and innovation (pp. 59–76). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00339.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, S. R. (2007). Update your classroom with learning objects and twenty-first-century skills. The Clearing House, 80(3), 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, Sydney: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–499. doi:10.1177/0539018406069584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2015). The Swedes and the internet 2015. https://www.iis.se/english/blog/the-swedes-and-the-internet-2015/

  • Dede, C., Whitehouse, P., & Brown-L’Bahy, T. (2002). Designing and studying learning experiences that use multiple interactive media to bridge distance and time. In C. Vrasidas & G. V. Glass (Eds.), Current perspectives on applied information technologies: Distance education and distributed learning (Vol. 1, pp. 1–30). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), 491–498. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdig, R. E. (2007). Editorial: Examining social software in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findah, O. (2013). Swedes and the Internet. SE (the Internet Infrastructure Foundation): Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanigan, A. E., & Babchuk, W. A. (2015). Social media as academic quicksand: A phenomenological study of student experiences in and out of the classroom. Learning and Individual differences, 44, 40–45. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett-Wright, D. M., & Abell, C. H. (2011). Using YouTube to bridge the gap between baby boomers and millennials. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(5), 298–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in Higher education: Policies and Practices. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Teaching and Learning Innovation (ITaLI). (2014). Future trends in teaching and learning in higher education. Australia: The University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, L. (2010). What net generation students really want: Determining library help-seeking preferences of undergraduates. Reference Services Review, 38(1), 10–27. doi:10.1108/00907321011020699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S. A. (2011). In-class versus online video lectures: Similar learning outcomes, but a preference for in-class. Teaching of Psychology, 38(4), 298–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, V. (2012). Publishers’ technologies and their impact on higher education. In H. Kazeroony (Ed.), The strategic management of higher education: Serving students as customers for institutional growth. New York: Business Expert Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Shao, B. (2011). The Net generation and digital natives: Implications for higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • June, S., Yaacob, A., & Kheng, Y. K. (2014). Assessing the use of YouTube videos and interactive activities as a critical thinking stimulator for tertiary students: An action research. International Education Studies, 7(8), 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karal, H., Çebi, A., & Turgut, Y. E. (2011). Perceptions of students who take synchronous courses through video conferencing about distance education. TOJET: The Turkish online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 276–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Groff, J., & Haas, J. (2009). Using the technology of today, in the classroom: The instructional power of digital games, social networking, simulations and how teachers can leverage them. The Education Arcade, 1, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvavik, R. B. (2005). Convenience, communications, and control: How students use technology. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net generation (pp. 7.1–7.20). North Carolina: State University: Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance, J., & Kitchin, P. (2007). Promoting the individual learning styles of masters students studying marketing-related modules through the use of YouTube video-clips. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a digital lifestyle: Millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. Paper presented at the ASCILITE 2005: Balance, Fidelity, Mobility: maintaining the momentum, QUT, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, K. (2010). Building innovation: Learning with technologies. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).

  • Mundy, M.-A., Kupczynski, L., & Kee, R. (2012). Teacher’s perceptions of technology use in the schools. Sage. doi:10.1177/2158244012440813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D. G. (2008). Emerging technologies for learning (Vol. 3, pp. 11–29). Coventry: Becta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). North Carolina: State University: Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onofrei, S. G. (2015). Teaching using new technologies and students resilience. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(2), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pletka, B. (2007). Educating the net generation: How to engage students in the 21st century. Santa Monica, CA: Santa Monica Press LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöntinen, S., Dillon, P., & Väisänen, P. (2017). Student teachers’ discourse about digital technologies and transitions between formal and informal learning contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 317–335. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9450-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A. D., Pastore, R., & Davis, R. (2015). Effects of captions and time-compressed video on learner performance and satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 222–227. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K. K. (2009). Student perceptions of the use of instructor-made videos in online and face-to-face classes. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(3), 487–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, P., & Shea, T. (2011). Using online video to support student learning and engagement. College Teaching, 59(2), 56–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinouvassane, D., & Nalini, A. (2016). Perception of flipped classroom model among year one and year three health science students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), 215–218. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speak up Project Tomorrow. (2010). Learning in the 21st Century: 2010 Trends Update (pp. 1–7). Wahington, DC: Blackboard Inc. Retrieved from http://www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/k-12-2010-trends-update-163469.pdf.

  • Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triggs, P., & Sutherland, R. (2009). A holistic approach to understanding teaching and learning with ICT. In R. Sutherland, S. Robertson, & P. John (Eds.), Improving classroom learning with ICT (pp. 3–26). London and New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle de Souza, S., Dollery, B., & Kortt, M. A. (2016). Counting the cost: A critical evaluation of the Australian National Broadband Network roll-out under the Rudd/Gillard governments. International Journal of Public Administration. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1255960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, P. (2010). Improving classroom learning. Eduviews: A K-12 leadership series. https://www.blackboard.com/resources/k12/K12_Improving_Classroom_Learning.pdf

  • Worley, K. (2011). Educating college students of the Net generation. Adult Learning, 22, 31–39. doi:10.1177/104515951102200305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, R. C. S. (2015). Perceptions of online learning in an Australian university: Malaysian students’ perspective-support for learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(8), 587–592. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. London and New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim Hajhashemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hajhashemi, K., Caltabiano, N. & Anderson, N. Net-Geners’ perceptions of engagement through online videos. J. Comput. Educ. 4, 321–337 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0084-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0084-7

Keywords

Navigation