Abstract
The fatigue performance of a roof-U rib weld on orthotropic steel bridge decks was studied by fatigue experiments on 40 specimens, considering the influences of amplitude, penetration rate, loading position, and steel strength. Influences of different factors on the fatigue life of crack initiation and specimen failure were studied by analysis of crack propagation in the weld and changes in stress amplitude. In addition, nominal stress amplitudes and hot spot stress amplitudes of the welds were compared and the suggested values of fatigue strength were proposed according to the test results. The study shows that increase of penetration rate can decrease the crack propagation rate and extend failure fatigue life. A larger steel strength can increase the fatigue strength of crack initiation. Under the same loading conditions, the fatigue life of crack initiation is about half of the failure fatigue strength. A nominal stress of 70 MPa and a hot spot stress of 75 MPa are recommended for fatigue strength of roof-U rib welds under the manufacturing process investigated here.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AASHTO (2012). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications (6th Edition), Washington, DC., USA.
Connor, R., Fisher, J., Gatti, W., Gopalaratnam, V., Kozy, B., Leshko, B., McQuaid, D. L., Medlock, R., Mertz, D., Murphy, T., Paterson, D., Sorensen, O., and Yadlosky, J. (2012). Manual for design, construction, and maintenance of orthotropic steel deck bridges, HDR Engineering, Incorporated, Pittsburgh, USA, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, USA.
Doebling, S. W. and Farrar, C. R. (1999). The state of the art in structural identification of constructed facilities, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Fisher, J. W. and Barsom, J. M. (2016). “Evaluation of cracking in the rib-to-deck welds of the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 04015065, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000823.
Guo, T., Li, A., and Li, J. (2008a). “Fatigue life prediction of welded joints in orthotropic steel decks considering temperature effect and increasing traffic flow.” Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 189–202, DOI: 10.1177/1475921708090556.
Guo, T., Li, A., and Wang, H. (2008b). “Influence of ambient temperature on the fatigue damage of welded bridge decks.” International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 1092–1102, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue. 2007.08.004.
Hao, S. (2010). “I-35W bridge collapse.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 608–614, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592. 0000090.
Hobbacher, A. (2015). Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components, Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23757-2.
Imam, B. M. and Chryssanthopoulos, M. K. (2010). “A review of metallic bridge failure statistics.” Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management: Proceedings of the Fifth International IABMAS Conference, Philadelphia, USA, July, 3275–3282, DOI: 10.1201/b10430-502.
Japan Road Association (JRA). (2002). Fatigue design guidelines for steel highway bridges, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese).
Ji, B.H., Chen, D.H., Ma, L., Jiang, Z., Shi, G., Xu, H., and Zhang X. (2012). “Research on stress spectrum of steel decks in suspension bridge considering measured traffic flow.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 65–75, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000249.
JTG D64-2015 (2015). Specifications for design of highway steel bridge, Beijing, China. (In Chinese).
Kainuma, S., Yang, M., Jeong, Y. S., Inokuchi, S., Kawabata, A., and Uchida, D. (2016). “Experiment on fatigue behavior of rib-to-deck weld root in orthotropic steel decks.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 119, pp. 113–122, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015. 11.014.
Maljaars, J, Dooren, F., and Kolstein, H. (2012). “Fatigue assessment for deck plates in orthotropic bridge decks.” Steel Construction, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 93–100, DOI: 10.1002/stco.201210011.
Nguyen, H. T., Chu, Q. T. and Kim, S. E. (2011). “Fatigue analysis of a pre-fabricated orthotropic steel deck for light-weight vehicles.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 647–655, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.11.015.
Oh, C. K. and Bae, D. (2013). “Fatigue test of an advanced orthotropic steel deck system using high performance steel for bridges.” International Journal of Steel Structures, Vol. 13, No. 13, pp. 93–101, DOI: 10.1007/s13296-013-1009-6.
Schijve, J. (2001). Fatigue of structures and materials, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Shao, X., Yi, D., Huang, Z., Zhao, H., Chen, B., and Liu, M. (2013). “Basic performance of the composite deck system composed of orthotropic steel deck and ultrathin RPC layer.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 417–428, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) BE.1943-5592.0000348.
Sim, H. B. and Uang, C. M. (2012). “Stress analyses and parametric study on full-scale fatigue tests of rib-to-deck welded joints in steel orthotropic decks.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 765–773, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000307.
Ya, S., Yamada, K., and Ishikawa, T. (2010). “Fatigue evaluation of ribto-deck welded joints of orthotropic steel bridge deck.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 492–499, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000181.
Yang, Z.G., Li, S. X., Li, Y. D., Liu, Y. B., Hui, W. J., and Weng, Y. Q. (2010). “Relationship among fatigue life, inclusion size and hydrogen concentration for high-strength steel in the VHCF regime.” Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 527, No. 3, pp. 559–564.
Yuanzhou, Z. Y., Ji, B. H., Fu, Z. Q., and Ge, H. B. (2016). “Fatigue performance of cracked rib-deck welded joint retrofitted by ICR technique.” International Journal of Steel Structures, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 735–742, DOI: 10.1007/s13296-015-0089-x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, Z., Ji, B., Zhang, C. et al. Experimental study on the fatigue performance of roof and U-rib welds of orthotropic steel bridge decks. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 270–278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1725-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1725-0