Abstract
Reach-to-grasp arm postures differ from those in pure reaching because they are affected by grasp position/orientation, rather than simple transport to a position during a reaching motion. This paper investigates this difference via an analysis of experimental data collected on reaching and reach-to-grasp motions. A seven-degree-of-freedom (DOFs) kinematic arm model with the swivel angle is used for the motion analysis. Compared to a widely used anatomical arm model, this model distinguishes clearly the four grasping-relevant DOFs (GR-DOFs) that are affected by positions and orientations of the objects to be grasped. These four GR-DOFs include the swivel angle that measures the elbow rotation about the shoulder–wrist axis, and three wrist joint angles. For each GR-DOF, we quantify position vs orientation task-relevance bias that measures how much the DOF is affected by the grasping position vs orientation. The swivel angle and forearm supination have similar bias, and the analysis of their motion suggests two hypotheses regarding the synergistic coordination of the macro- and micro-structures of the human arm (1) DOFs with similar task-relevance are synergistically coordinated; and (2) such synergy breaks when a task-relevant DOF is close to its joint limit without necessarily reaching the limit. This study provides a motion analysis method to reduce the control complexity for reach-to-grasp tasks, and suggests using dynamic coupling to coordinate the hand and arm of upper-limb exoskeletons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asada H, Granito J (1985) Kinematic and static characterization of wrist joints and their optimal design. In: ICRA 1985. St. Louis, Missouri, March 1985, pp 244–250
Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Catalano M, Grioli G, Farnioli E, Serio A, Piazza C, Bicchi A (2014) Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the pisa/iit softhand. Brain 33(5):768–782
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge
Davids K, Bennett S, Newell KM (2006) Movement system variability. Human kinetics, Champaign
Fan J, He J, Tillery S (2006) Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp. Exp Brain Res 171(3):283–296
Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurophysiol 5:1688–1703
Glasauer S (2010) Interacting in time and space: investigating human–human and human–robot joint action. In: RO-MAN, Viareggio, Italy. Sept. 2010, pp 252–257
Haggard P, Wing A (2001) On the hand transport component of prehensile movements. Curr Biol 29(3):282–287
Haustein W (1989) Considerations on listing’s law and the primary position by means of a matrix description of eye position control. Biol Cybern 60(6):411–420
Hogan N (1984) An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4(2):2745–2754
Huang J, Hara M, Yabuta T (2010) Controlling a finger-arm robot to emulate the motion of the human upper limb by regulating finger manipulability. In: Motion control, Casolo F (ed) INTECH. pp 773–792
Ingram J, Kording K, Howard I, Wolpert D (2008) The statistics of natural hand movements. Exp Brain Res 188(2):223–236
Kang T, He J, Tillery SIH (2005) Determining natural arm configuration along a reaching trajectory. Exp Brain Res 167:352–361
Khatib O (1995) Inertial properties in robotic manipulation: an object-level framework. IJRR 5:19–36
Kim H (2014) Systematic control and application for 7 dof upper-limb exoskeleton, Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Santa Cruz
Kim H, Miller L, Rosen J (2011) Redundancy resolution of a human arm for controlling a seven dof wearable robotic system. In: EMBC 2011, Boston, USA, Auguest 2011
Kupferberg A, Glasauer S, Huber M, Rickert M, Knoll A, Brandt T (2011) Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partners in motor interaction. AI Soc 26(4):339–345
Latash M (2008) Synergy, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, USA
Latash M (2010) Motor synergies and the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Motor Control 14(3):294–322
Li Z, Gray K, Roldan J, Roldan J, Milutinovic D, Rosen J (2014) The joint coordination in reach-to-grasp movements. In: IROS. Chicago, IL. Sept. 2014, pp 906–911
Li Z, Roldan J, Milutinović D, Rosen J (2014) Task-relevance of grasping-related degrees of freedom in reach-to-grasp movements. In: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. Chicago, IL, Aug. 2014, pp 6903–6906
Liu M, Xiong C (2014) Synergistic characteristic of human hand during grasping tasks in daily life. Intell Robot Appl 8917:67–76
Mason C, Gomez J, Ebner T (2001) Hand synergies during reach-to-grasp. J Neurophysiol 86(6):2896–2910
Li Z, Milutinovic D, Rosen J (2015) Spatial Map of Synthesized Criteria for the Redundancy Resolution of Human Arm Movements. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 23(6):1020–1030
Nakamura Y, Hanafusa H, Yoshikawa T (1987) Task-priority based redundancy control of robot manipulators. IJRR 6:3–15
Nakano E, Imamizu H, Osu R, Uno Y, Gomi H, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (1999) Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model. J Neurophysiol 81(5):2140–2155
Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting J (1998) Postural hand synergies for tool use. J Neurosci 18:10105–10115
Santello M, Baud-Bovy G, Jorntell H (2013) Neural bases of hand synergies. Front Comput Neurosci 7:83–90
Scholz JP, Schoner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Expe Brain Res 126(3):289–306
Sciavicco L (1987) A dynamic solution to the inverse kinematic problem for redundant manipulators. In: ICRA, vol. 4. Raleigh, NC, USA, Mar. 1987, pp 1081–1087
Sciavicco L (1988) A solution algorithm to the inverse kinematic problem for redundant manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot Automat 4(4):403–410
Simkins M, Al-Refai A, Rosen J (2014) Upper limb joint space modeling of stroke induced synergies using isolated and voluntary arm perturbations. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 22(3):491–500
Smeets J, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3:237–271
Soechting J, Buneo C, Herrmann U, Flanders M (1995) Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does donders’ law apply to arm movement? J Neurosci 15(9):6271–6280
Soechting J, Flanders M (1993) Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. J Neurophysiol 70(3):1137–1150
Tillery S, Ebner T, Soechting J (1995) Task dependence of primate arm postures. Exp Brain Res 104(1):1–11
Todorov E (2004) Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7:907–915
Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1226–1235
Turvey MT (2007) Action and perception at the level of synergies. Hum Mov Sci 26:657–697
Uno Y, Kawato M, Suzuki R (1989) Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement—minimum torque-change model. Biol Cybern 61:89–101
Yang N, Zhang M, Huang C, Jin D (2002) Synergic analysis of upper limb target-reaching movements. J Biomech 35:739–746
Yoshikawa T (1990) Foundations of robotics: analysis and control. The MIT Press
Yoshikawa T (1985) Dynamic manipulability of robot manipulators. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, March 1985, pp 1033–1038
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Z., Milutinović, D. & Rosen, J. From reaching to reach-to-grasp: the arm posture difference and its implications on human motion control strategy. Exp Brain Res 235, 1627–1642 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4890-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4890-y