Skip to main content
Log in

Research of predictive factors for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a prospective study comparing data from phase-analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon computed tomography and echocardiography

Trying to anticipate response to CRT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in chronic systolic heart failure. About 20% of implanted patients are considered as “non-responders”. This study aimed to evaluate gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (GMPS) phase parameters as compared to echocardiography in the assessment of predictors for response to CRT before and after CRT activation.

Methods

Forty-two patients were prospectively included during 15 months. A single injection of 99mTc-tetrofosmin was used to acquire GMPS phase pre- and post-CRT activation. Indicators of positive CRT response were improvement of functional status and 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 3 months.

Results

Phase parameters at baseline were similar in the two groups with no influence of perfusion data. Phase parameters after CRT activation were significantly improved in the responders’ group (Δ Bandwidth −19° ± 24° vs. 13° ± 31°, p = 0.001; Δ SD −20° ± 30° vs. 26° ± 46°, p = 0.001; Δ Entropy −11 ± 12 vs. 2 ± 6%, p = 0.001). Feasibility and reproducibility were higher for GMPS.

Conclusion

Acute phase modifications after CRT activation may predict response to CRT immediately after implantation, but not at baseline, even when adjusted to perfusion data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

β:

Bandwidth

Ә:

Entropy

ε :

Strain

CRT:

Cardiac resynchronization therapy

GMPS:

Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT

HF:

Heart failure

ICC:

Intraclass correlation

ICM:

Ischemic cardiomyopathy

IVMD:

Interventricular mechanical delay

LLWC:

Left lateral wall contraction

LV:

Left ventricle

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

LVEDV:

Left ventricular end-diastolic volume

LVESV:

Left ventricular end-systolic volume

LVFT:

Left ventricular filling time

LWMP:

Lateral wall myocardial perfusion

NYHA:

New York Heart Association

TTE:

Trans-thoracic echocardiography

SD:

Standard deviation

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography

SPWMD:

Septal-posterior wall motion delay

References

  1. Abraham WT, Fisher W, Smith A, Delurgio DB, Leon A, Loh E, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1845–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S, Block M, Vogt J, Bakker P, et al. Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(12):2026–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cleland JGF, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2281–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Auricchio A, Prinzen FW. Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy—the magnitude of the problem and the issues. Circ J. 2011;75:521–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu CM, Sanderson JE, Gorcsan J III. Echocardiography, dyssynchrony, and the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2010:2326–37.

  7. Yu CM, Zhang Q, Fung JW, Chan HC, Chan YS, Yip GW, et al. A novel tool to assess systolic asynchrony and identify responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy by tissue synchronization imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:677–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim P BA, Popovi ZB, Greenberg NL, Patel D, Thomas JD, et al. Longitudinal strain delay index by speckle tracking imaging: a new marker of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2008;118:1130–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seo Y, Ito H, Nakatani S, Takami M, Naito S, Shiga T, et al. The role of echocardiography in predicting responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy—results from the Japan Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Registry Trial (J-CRT). Circ J. 2011;75:1156–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, Sun JP, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J, et al. Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial. Circulation. 2008;117(20):2608–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruschitzka F, Abraham WT, Singh JP, Bax JJ, Borer JS, Brugada J, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with a narrow QRS complex. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(10):1395–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Doltra A, Bijnens B, Tolosana JM, Borràs R, Khatib M, Penela D, et al. Mechanical abnormalities detected with conventional echocardiography are associated with response and midterm survival in CRT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(10):969–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Henneman MM, Chen J, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel MP, Bleeker GB, Ypenburg C, et al. Can LV dyssynchrony as assessed with phase analysis on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT predict response to CRT? J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Bleeker GB, Boersma E, et al. Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography compared with tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49.

  15. Boogers MJ, Chen J, Veltman CE, van Bommel R J, Mooyaart EAQ, Al Younis I, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dyssynchrony assessed with phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: a comparison with tissue Doppler imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:2031–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Kriekinge SD, Nishina H, Ohba M, Berman DS, Germano G. Automatic global and regional phase analysis from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT Imaging: application to the characterization of ventricular contraction in patients with left bundle branch block. J Nucl Med. 2008;49.

  17. Boogers MM, Van Kriekinge SD, Henneman MM, Ypenburg C, Van Bommel RJ, Boersma E, et al. Quantitative gated SPECT derived phase analysis on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT detects left ventricular dyssynchrony and predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:718–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27:623–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gasparini M, Regoli F, Ceriotti C, Galimberti P, Bragato R, De Vita S, et al. Remission of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and of heart failure symptoms after cardiac resynchronization therapy: temporal pattern and clinical predictors. Am Heart J. 2008;155:507–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Adelstein EC, Tanaka H, Soman P, Miske G, Haberman SC, Saba SF, et al. Impact of scar burden by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging on patient outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011(32):93–103.

  21. Ypenburg C, Van Bommel R J, Willem Borleffs CJ, Bleeker GB, Boersma E, Schalij MJ, et al. Long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy is related to the extent of left ventricular reverse remodeling at midterm follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(6):483–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Azizian N RF, Ghaedian T, Golabchi A, Bahadorian B, Khanlarzadeh V, et al. LV dyssynchrony assessed with phase analysis on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT can predict response to CRT in patients with end-stage heart failure. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2014;3(4):e20720.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Friehling M, Chen J, Saba S, Bazaz R, Schwartzman D, Adelstein EC, et al. A prospective pilot study to evaluate the relationship between acute change in left ventricular synchrony after cardiac resynchronization therapy and patient outcome using a single-injection gated SPECT protocol. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:532–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins SL, Hummel JD, Niazi IK, Giudici MC, Worley SJ, Saxon LA, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for the treatment of heart failure in patients with intraventricular conduction delay and malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(8):1454–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rémy Gendre.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest or disclosure statement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gendre, R., Lairez, O., Mondoly, P. et al. Research of predictive factors for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a prospective study comparing data from phase-analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon computed tomography and echocardiography. Ann Nucl Med 31, 218–226 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1148-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1148-5

Keywords

Navigation