Abstract
Given its pedagogical appeal, the number line is a commonly used representation in the teaching and learning of fractions. However, behind its apparent simplicity, this mathematical object may involve layers of complexity when looked at from the perspective of affordances as is the case in this study. In particular, this in situ exploration examined the affordances of the number line as a mathematical object in fractions instruction. Watson’s (Res Math Educ 9(1), 111–126, 2007) analytical framework was used to scrutinise moment-by-moment teaching sequences from videotaped data collected from four 7th grade lessons conducted by 2 teachers. The results show the dissonance that may arise between teachers’ intentions and the accompanying students’ interpretations when the number line is the object of discussion. The teachers inadvertently used the area and measurement model of fractions almost simultaneously with the result that students were constrained to make sense of the teachers’ intention. Consequently, the 2 teachers made several instructional attempts to enable the affordances concealed in the number line to become more perceptible. Such instructional attempts took the form of modified tasks, questions, prompts and actions that the teachers brought to the fore spontaneously. Aligning with known difficulties associated with number lines, this study further highlights the instructional subtleties that may be necessary in making affordances visible to help students understand the measure meaning of fractions. Explicitness in instruction is critical to enable the affordances inherent in a mathematical object to be perceptible to allow access to concepts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bright, G. W., Behr, M. J., Post, T. R. & Wachsmuth, I. (1988). Identifying fractions on number lines. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(3), 215–232.
Brown, J., Stillman, G. & Herbert, S. (2004). Can the notion of affordances be of use in the design of a technology enriched mathematics curriculum? In I. Putt, R. Faragher & M. McLean (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Townsville (Vol. 1, pp. 119–126). Sydney, Australia: MERGA.
Burlamaqui, L. & Dong, A. (2014). The use and misuse of the concept of affordance. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Design computing and cognition ’14 (pp. 1–10). London: Springer.
Diezmann, C. M. & Lowrie, T. (2006). Primary students’ knowledge of and errors on number lines: Developing an evidence base. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & R. Chinnapean (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 171–178). Canberra, Australia: MERGA Inc.
Erhardt, N., Gibbs, J., Martin-Rios, C. & Sherblom, J. (2016). Exploring affordances of email for team learning over time. Small Group Research, 47(3), 243–278.
Gall, M. & Breeze, N. (2005). Music composition lessons: The multimodal affordances of technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 415–433.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Hammond, M. (2010). What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education? Education and Information Technologies, 15(3), 205–217.
Hannula, M. S. (2003). Locating fraction on a number line. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 17–24.
Izsák, A., Jacobson, E., de Araujo, Z. & Orrill, C. H. (2012). Measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching fractions with drawn quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 391–427.
Kieren, T. E. (1993). Rational and fractional numbers: From quotient fields to recursive understanding. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 49–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence.
Lamon, S. J. (2008). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence.
Ni, Y. (2000). How valid is it to use number lines to measure children’s conceptual knowledge about rational number? Educational Psychology, 20(2), 139–152. doi:10.1080/713663716.
Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.
Petit, M. M., Laird, R. E. & Marsden, E. L. (2010). A focus on fractions: Bringing research to the classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.
Psycharis, G., Latsi, M. & Kynigos, C. (2009). Meanings for fraction as number-measure by exploring the number line. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 91–107.
Saxe, G. B., Shaughnessey, M., Shannon, A., Langer-Osuna, J., Chinn, R. & Gearhart, M. (2007). Learning about fractions as points on a number line. In W. G. Martin, M. E. Strutches & P. C. Eliot (Eds.), The learning of mathematics (69th NCTM Yearbook) (pp. 221–236). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Saxe, G. B., Shaughnessy, M. M., Gearhart, M. & Haldar, L. C. (2013). Coordinating numeric and linear units: Elementary students’ strategies for locating whole numbers on the number line. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(4), 235–258.
Watson, A. (2004). Affordances, constraints and attunements in mathematical activity. Research in Mathematics Education, 6(1), 23–34.
Watson, A. (2007). The nature of participation afforded by tasks, questions and prompts in mathematics classroom. Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 111–126.
Webb, M. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: Implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705–735.
Wong, M. (2013). Identifying fractions on a number line. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 18(3), 13–18.
Zhang, X., Clements, M. A. & Ellerton, N. F. (2015). Conceptual mis(understandings) of fractions: From area models to multiple embodiments. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(2), 233–261.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all participants involved in this research. The authors also wish to thank Professor Jill Adler, Professor Tom Lowrie, Tracy Logan and Dr. Mahsa Izadinia for their insightful comments on this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patahuddin, S.M., Usman, H.B. & Ramful, A. Affordances from Number Lines in Fractions Instruction: Students’ Interpretation of Teacher’s Intentions. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 16, 909–928 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9800-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9800-z