Skip to main content
Log in

The Registered Behavior Technician™ Credential: A Response to Leaf et al. (2017)

  • Discussion and Review Paper
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. The RBT credential was developed in response to various stakeholders (e.g., funders, legislators) who sought a credential for the individuals who actually make direct contact with clients.

  2. BCBA and BCaBA supervisors must both meet identical BACB requirements for supervision of RBTs.

  3. The authors provided examples of intervention studies (e.g., Lovaas, 1987) in which behavior technicians were trained for more than 40 h (the current minimum duration of RBT training). However, these studies were not conducted to determine a necessary training duration; they simply described the amount of training received by technicians. Consequently, the relation between treatment outcome and training duration cannot be ascertained from those studies.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Carr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors are affiliated with the BACB, the organization that offers the RBT credential, which is the subject of Leaf et al. (2017).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carr, J.E., Nosik, M.R. & DeLeon, I.G. The Registered Behavior Technician™ Credential: A Response to Leaf et al. (2017). Behav Analysis Practice 10, 164–166 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0172-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0172-1

Keywords

Navigation