Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of inflow conditions on mountainous/urban wind environment simulation

  • Research Article
  • Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inflow conditions play a key role in the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation of wind environment. Taking the micro wind climate of Hong Kong Kowloon Bay costal town as a research object, two kinds of widely used inflow condition determination methods are adopted to test their performances. One is to fit the velocity profile into the empirical (logarithmic/exponential) law, hereafter referred to as the Fitted Empirical Profile (FEP) method. The other is to interpolate the outflow velocities and turbulence properties from a pre-simulation of the upstream region, hereafter referred to as the Interpolated Multiscale Profile (IMP) method. The GIS data of this mountainous/ urban area are digitalized and simplified into the CFD geometry model. Computational treatments for numerical algorithms, domain size, grid systems and boundary conditions are carefully configured according to the published CFD Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs). By validating with one year of real scale wind measurement data from two meteorological stations, it is found that these two inflow conditions lead to considerably different results. Having less consideration for the blockage effects of terrain/buildings, the FEP method tends to predict higher wind speed. As more thermal effects are removed by increasing wind speed thresholds, the results of IMP method demonstrate an incremental agreement with the measurement data. Finally, the validated simulation results are applied to the spatial representativeness assessment of two meteorological stations. Both the point-to-surface consistency indicator and point-centered semivariance are employed. The results show that the meteorological stations show a good representation within a range of 400 m.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Architectural Institute of Japan (1996). AIJ Recommendations for Loads on Buildings. Tokyo: Architectural Institute of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashie Y, Kono T (2011). Urban-scale CFD analysis in support of a climate-sensitive design for the Tokyo Bay area. International Journal of Climatology, 31: 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocken B (2015). Computational Fluid Dynamics for urban physics: Importance, scales, possibilities, limitations and ten tips and tricks towards accurate and reliable simulations. Building and Environment, 91: 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocken B, Gualtieri C (2012). Ten iterative steps for model development and evaluation applied to Computational Fluid Dynamics for Environmental Fluid Mechanics. Environmental Modelling & Software, 33: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocken B, Janssen WD, van Hooff T (2012). CFD simulation for pedestrian wind comfort and wind safety in urban areas: General decision framework and case study for the Eindhoven University campus. Environmental Modelling & Software, 30: 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocken B, Persoon J (2009). Pedestrian wind comfort around a large football stadium in an urban environment: CFD simulation, validation and application of the new Dutch wind nuisance standard. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 97: 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocken B, van der Hout A, Dekker J, Weiler O (2015). CFD simulation of wind flow over natural complex terrain: Case study with validation by field measurements for Ria de Ferrol, Galicia, Spain. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 147: 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottema M (1995). Aerodynamic roughness parameters for homogeneous building groups—Part 2: Results document SUB-MESO 23. Nantes, France: Ecole Central de Nantes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burcsu TK, Robeson SM, Meretsky VJ (2001). Identifying the distance of vegetative edge effects using Landsat TM data and geostatistical methods. Geocarto International, 16(4): 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan PW (2008). Determination of Richardson number profile from remote sensing data and its aviation application. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2008(1): 012043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Coops NC, Fu D, Margolis HA, Amiro BD, Black TA, Arain MA, Barr AG, Bourque CPA, Flanagan LB, Lafleur PM, McCaughey JH, Wofsy SC (2012). Characterizing spatial representativeness of flux tower eddy-covariance measurements across the Canadian Carbon Program Network using remote sensing and footprint analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 124: 742–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen QY (2004). Using computational tools to factor wind into architectural environment design. Energy and Buildings, 36: 1197–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu YH, Su CL, Larsen MF, Chao CK (2007). First measurements of neutral wind and turbulence in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere over Taiwan with a chemical release experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 112: A02301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolman AJ (1986). Estimates of roughness length and zero plane displacement for a foliated and non-foliated oak canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 36: 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fothergill CE, Roberts PT, Packwood AR (2002). Flow and dispersion around storage tanks—A comparison between numerical and wind tunnel simulations. Wind and Structures, 5: 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke J (2006). Recommendations of the COST action C14 on the use of CFD in predicting pedestrian wind environment. Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering, Yokohama, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke J, Hirsch C, Jensen AG, Krüs HW, Schatzmann M, Westbury PS, Miles SD, Wisse JA, Wright NG (2004). Recommendations on the use of CFD in wind engineering. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Urban Wind Engineering and Building Aerodynamics. COST action C14, Impact of Wind And Storm on City Life Built Environment, SintGenesius-Rode, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlünzen H, Carissimo B (2007). Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. Brussels: COST Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Z, Bian L (2004). Estimation of aerodynamic roughness length and displacement height of an urban surface from single-level sonic anemometer data. Australian Meteorological Magazine, 53(1): 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Sánchez C, Philips DA, Gorlé C (2014). Quantifying inflow uncertainties for CFD simulations of the flow in downtown Oklahoma City. Building and Environment, 78: 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrigues S, Allard D, Baret F, Weiss M (2006). Quantifying spatial heterogeneity at the landscape scale using variogram models. Remote Sensing of Environment, 103(1): 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorlé C, Garcia-Sanchez C, Iaccarino G (2015). Quantifying inflow and RANS turbulence model form uncertainties for wind engineering flows. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 144: 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hang J, Luo Z, Sandberg M, Gong J (2013). Natural ventilation assessment in typical open and semi-open urban environments under various wind directions. Building and Environment, 70: 318–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis MJ, Robeson SM (2004). Determining the spatial representativeness of air-temperature records using variogram-nugget time series. Physical Geography, 25: 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen WD, Blocken B, van Hooff T (2013). Pedestrian wind comfort around buildings: Comparison of wind comfort criteria based on whole-flow field data for a complex case study. Building and Environment, 59: 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo J, Yamazawa H (1986). Aerodynamic roughness over an inhomogeneous ground surface. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 35: 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettau H (1969). Note on aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness-element description. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 8: 828–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZW, He DX (2013). Reviews of fluid dynamics researches in wind energy engineering. Advances in Mechanics, 43: 472–525. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Xiao YQ, L AB (2015). Revisiting the CFD modeling horizontally homogenous atmospheric boundary layer. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YS, Miao SG, Zhang CL, Cui GX, Zhang ZS (2012). Study on micro-atmospheric environment by coupling large eddy simulation with mesoscale model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 107–108: 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Ishihara T, Tanaka T, He X (2016). LES study of turbulent flow fields over a smooth 3-D hill and a smooth 2-D ridge. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 153: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao Y, Liu S, Chen B, Zhang B, Wang S, Li S (2013). Simulating urban flow and dispersion in Beijing by coupling a CFD model with the WRF model. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 30: 1663–1678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei PA, Carmeliet J (2013). Dynamical computational fluid dynamics modeling of the stochastic wind for application of urban studies. Building and Environment, 70: 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardyjak ER, Monti P, Fernando HJS (2002). Flux Richardson number measurements in stable atmospheric shear flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 459: 307–316.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramponi R, Blocken B, de Coo L, Janssen WD (2015). CFD simulation of outdoor ventilation of generic urban configurations with different urban densities and equal and unequal street widths. Building and Environment, 92: 152–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards PJ, Hoxey RP (1993). Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k–e turbulence model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 46–47: 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzmann M, Leitl B (2011). Issues with validation of urban flow and dispersion CFD models. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99: 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid HP, Lloyd CR (1999). Spatial representativeness and the location bias of flux footprints over inhomogeneous areas. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 93: 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih T, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1995). A new k–e eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, 24: 227–238.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, Shirasawa T (2008). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96: 1749–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T (2013). CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion in the urban environment: A review of current modeling techniques. Atmospheric Environment, 79: 716–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toparlar Y, Blocken B, Vos P, van Heijst GJF, Janssen WD, van Hooff T, Montazeri H, Timmermans HJP (2015). CFD simulation and validation of urban microclimate: A case study for Bergpolder Zuid, Rotterdam. Building and Environment, 83: 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hooff T, Blocken B (2010). Coupled urban wind flow and indoor natural ventilation modelling on a high-resolution grid: A case study for the Amsterdam ArenA stadium. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25: 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Li Y, Hang J (2017). A combined fully-resolved and porous approach for building cluster wind flows. Building Simulation, 10: 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa J (1992). Updating the Davenport roughness classification. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 41: 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T, Koike K (2011). Downscaling mesoscale meteorological models for computational wind engineering applications. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99: 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshie R, Mochida A, Tominaga Y (2006). CFD prediction of wind environment around a high-rise building located in an urban area. In: Proceedings of the 4h International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering, Yokohama, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshie R, Mochida A, Tominaga Y, Kataoka H, Harimoto K, Nozu T, Shirasawa T (2007). Cooperative project for CFD prediction of pedestrian wind environment in the Architectural Institute of Japan. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95: 1551–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajaczkowski FJ, Haupt SE, Schmehl KJ (2011). A preliminary study of assimilating numerical weather prediction data into computational fluid dynamics models for wind prediction. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99: 320–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Hong Kong Observatory, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51278161, 51308167 and 51508135), the Natural Scientific Research and Innovation Foundation within Harbin Institute of Technology (2015086) and Shenzhen Knowledge Innovation program (Nos. KQJSCX20160226201838 and JCYJ20140417172417115), all of which are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China

    Chao Li, Shengtao Zhou, Yiqing Xiao & Qin Huang

  2. College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

    Lixiao Li

  3. Hong Kong Observatory, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

    P. W. Chan

Authors
  1. Chao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shengtao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiqing Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lixiao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. W. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiqing Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Zhou, S., Xiao, Y. et al. Effects of inflow conditions on mountainous/urban wind environment simulation. Build. Simul. 10, 573–588 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0348-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0348-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation