Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of dung-pad conditions and density on coprophagous beetle assemblages in a Mediterranean rangeland

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dung beetles highly depend on the ephemeral microhabitat dung which is food resource and larval habitat at the same time. Environmental conditions surrounding a dung pad, such as vegetation structure, have an impact on dung beetle assemblages. We investigated the influence of dung conditions and surrounding habitat characteristics on Mediterranean dung beetle assemblages in a permanently grazed landscape in northern Sardinia. We sampled the dung beetle assemblages of donkey and horse dung in three different vegetation types and assessed species richness and abundance of dung beetles. Species richness was determined by dung and surrounding habitat conditions, whereas abundance was solely affected by dung conditions. However, species richness and abundance decreased with increasing dung density. The effect of dung density on species richness varied depending on vegetation type, with dry grassland exhibiting the highest number of dung beetles species at high dung density. Species composition in dung pads was influenced by abiotic factors with dwellers being negatively affected by increasing dung-pad temperature. Our results underline the importance of diverse vegetation, particularly with respect to the complexity of vegetation which interrelates with the microclimate. Furthermore, our findings illustrate the negative effect of high dung densities on dung beetle assemblages, suggesting that the degree of the intensity of use by grazing animals is important when considering measures for the conservation of dung beetles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alados CL, ElAich A, Papanastasis VP, Ozbek H, Navarro T, Freitas H, Vrahnakis M, Larrosi D, Cabezudo B (2004) Change in plant spatial patterns and diversity along the successional gradient of Mediterranean grazing ecosystems. Ecol Model 180:523–535. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auffret AG (2011) Can seed dispersal by human activity play a useful role for the conservation of European grasslands? Appl Veg Sci 14:291–303. doi:10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01124.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barragán F, Moreno CE, Escobar F, Bueno-Villegas J, Halffter G, McGeoch M (2014) The impact of grazing on dung beetle diversity depends on both biogeographical and ecological context. J Biogeogr 41:1991–2002. doi:10.1111/jbi.12351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2016). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.15.6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

  • Blondel J (2006) The ‘design’ of Mediterranean landscapes: a millennial story of humans and ecological systems during the Historic Period. Hum Ecol 34:713–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brussaard L, Slager S (1986) The influence of soil bulk density and soil moisture on the habitat selection of the dung beetle Typhaeus typhoeus in the Netherlands. Biol Fert Soils 2:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse J, Šlachta M, Sladecek FX, Pung M, Wagner T, Entling MH (2015) Relative importance of pasture size and grazing continuity for the long-term conservation of European dung beetles. Biol Conserv 187:112–119. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambefort Y, Hanski I (1991) Dung beetle population biology. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 36–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpaneto GM, Mazziotta A, Valerio L (2007) Inferring species decline from collection records: roller dung beetles in Italy (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Divers Distrib 13:903–919. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00397.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK, Prudic KL, Oliver JC (2003) Effects of local habitat characteristics and landscape context on grassland butterfly diversity. Conserv Biol 17:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AL, van Aarde RJ, Scholtz CH, Delport JH (2003) Convergence between dung beetle assemblages of a post-mining vegetational chronosequence and unmined dune forest. Restor Ecol 11:29–42. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00133.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dormont L, Epinat G, Lumaret J-P (2004) Trophic preferences mediated by olfactory cues in dung beetles colonizing cattle and horse dung. Environ Entomol 33:370–377. doi:10.1603/0046-225X-33.2.370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier DA, Skaug HJ, Ancheta J, Ianelli J, Magnusson A, Maunder M, Nielsen A, Sibert J (2012) AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models. Optim Methods Softw 27:233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galante E, Cartagena MC (1999) Comparison of Mediterranean dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) in cattle and rabbit dung. Environ Entomol 28(3):420–424. doi:10.1093/ee/28.3.420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galante E, Mena J, Lumbreras C (1995) Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae) attracted to fresh cattle dung in wooded and open pasture. Environ Entomol 24:1063–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1991) North temperate dung beetles. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Kicklighter CE (2013) Grazing, effects of biodiversity. In: Levin S. (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (2nd Edn). Academic Press, Waltham, pp 8–17

  • Hutton SA, Giller PS (2003) The efects of the intensification of agriculture on northern temperate dung beetle communities. J Appl Ecol 40:994–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo VJ, Detling JK (1992) Small-scale heterogeneity in a semi-arid North American grassland. I. Tillering, N uptake and retranslocation in simulated urine patches. J Appl Ecol 29:1–8. doi:10.2307/2404340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay-Robert P, Niogret J, Errouissi F, Labarussias M, Paoletti É, Luis MV, Lumaret J-P (2008) Relative efficiency of extensive grazing vs. wild ungulates management for dung beetle conservation in a heterogeneous landscape from Southern Europe (Scarabaeinae, Aphodiinae, Geotrupinae). Biol Conserv 141:2879–2887. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koike S, Soga M, Nemoto Y, Kozakai C (2014) How are dung beetle species affected by deer population increases in a cool temperate forest ecosystem? J Zool 293:227–233. doi:10.1111/jzo.12138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela H, Hanski I (1977) Structure and succession in a beetle community inhabiting cow dung. Ann Zool Fenn 14:204–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Krell F-T, Fery H (1992) Familienreihe Lamellicornia. In: Lohse GA, Lucht WH (eds) Die Käfer Mitteleuropas 13 (2. Supplementband mit Katalogteil). Goecke & Evers, Krefeld, pp 200–252

  • Lobo JM, Lumaret J-P, Jay-Robert P (1998) Sampling dung beetles in the French Mediterranean area: effects of abiotic factors and farm practices. Pedobiologia 42:252–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo JM, Lumaret J-P, Jay-Robert P (2001) Diversity, distinctiveness and conservation status of the Mediterranean coastal dung beetle assemblage in the Regional Natural Park of the Camargue (France). Divers Distrib 7:257–270. doi:10.1046/j.1366-9516.2001.00122.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo JM, Hortal J, Cabrero-Sañudo FJ (2006) Regional and local influence of grazing activity on the diversity of a semi-arid dung beetle community. Divers Distrib 12:111–123. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00194.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lompe A (2015) Die Käfer Europas. Ein Bestimmungswerk im Internet. Begründet im Spetember 2002. http://www.coleo-net.de/coleo/index.htm

  • Lumaret J-P, Kirk A (1987) Ecology of dung beetles in the French Mediterranean region (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Acta Zool Mex (ns) 24:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Piera F, Veiga CM, Lobo JM (1986) Contribución al conocimiento de los Scarabaeoidea (Col.) coprófagos del Macizo Central de Guadarrama. Eos 62:103–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Piera F, Veiga CM, Lobo JM (1992) Ecology and biogeography of dung-beetle communities (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) in an Iberian mountain range. J Biogeogr 19:677–691. doi:10.2307/2845709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez R, Gutiérrez D (1996) Altitudinal effects on habitat selection of dung beetles (Scarabaeoidea: Aphodiidae) in the Northern Iberian Peninsula. Ecography 19:313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez R, Gutiérrez D (2004) Shifts in habitat associations of dung beetles in northern Spain: climate change implications. Écoscience 11:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC (1998) Livestock grazing: animal and plant biodiversity of shortgrass steppe and the relationship to ecosystem function. Oikos 83:65–74. doi:10.2307/3546547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore I (1954) An efficient method of collecting dung beetles. Pan Pac Entomol 30:19

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z, Whittaker RH (1979) Structural and floristic diversity of shrublands and woodlands in Northern Israel and other Mediterranean areas. Vegetatio 41:171–190. doi:10.1007/BF00052445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Larsen T, Spector S, Davis AL, Escobar F, Favila M, Vulinec K (2007) Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 137:1–19. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada J, Larsen T, Amezquita S, Favila ME (2008) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol Conserv 141:1461–1474. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir I, Gutman M, Kaplan Y (1989) Responses of Mediterranean grassland plants to grazing and protection. J Ecol 77:290–310. doi:10.2307/2260930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MH, Wagner H (2015) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2. 3-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  • Olea L, San Miguel-Ayanz A (2006) The Spanish dehesa. A traditional Mediterranean silvopastoral system linking production and nature conservation. Grassland Sci Eur 11:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Olff H, Ritchie ME (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. TREE 13:261–265. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01364-0

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osem Y, Perevolotsky A, Kigel J (2002) Grazing effect on diversity of annual plant communities in a semi-arid rangeland: interactions with small-scale spatial and temporal variation in primary productivity. J Ecol 90:936–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otway SJ, Hector A, Lawton JH (2005) Resource dilution effects on specialist insect herbivores in a grassland biodiversity experiment. J Anim Ecol 74:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou AD, Fyllas NM, Mazaris AD, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Kallimanis AS, Pantis JD (2011) Grazing effects on plant functional group diversity in Mediterranean shrublands. Biodivers Conserv 20:2831–2843. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-0112-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perevolotsky A, Seligman NG (1998) Role of grazing in Mediterranean rangeland ecosystems. Bioscience 48:1007–1017. doi:10.2307/1313457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisanu S, Farris E, Caria MC, Filigheddu RS, Urbani M, Bagella S (2014) Vegetation and plant landscape of Asinara National Park. Plant Sociol 51:31–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T, Schaich H, Kizos T (2011) Land-use legacies in the forest structure of silvopastoral oak woodlands in the Eastern Mediterranean. Reg Environ Chang 11:603–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Romero-Alcaraz E, Ávila JM (2000) Effect of elevation and type of habitat on the abundance and diversity of Scarabaeoid dung beetle (Scarabaeoidea) assemblages in a Mediterranean area from Southern Iberian Peninsula. Zool Stud 39:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Rook AJ, Tallowin JRB (2003) Grazing and pasture management for biodiversity benefit. Anim Res 52:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root RB (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr 43:95–124. doi:10.2307/1942161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-de-Jesús H, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Andresen E, Escobar F (2015) Forest loss and matrix composition are the major drivers shaping dung beetle assemblages in a fragmented rainforest. Landscape Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0293-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmartin M, Oesterheld M (2001) Effects of grazing pattern and nitrogen availability on primary productivity. Oecologia 126:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjödin NE, Bengtsson J, Ekbom B (2008) The influence of grazing intensity and landscape composition on the diversity and abundance of flower-visiting insects. J Appl Ecol 45:763–772. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01443.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaug HJ, Fournier D, Bolker B, Magnusson A, Nielsen A (2016) Generalized Linear Mixed Models using ‘AD Model Builder’. R package version 0.8.3.3

  • Sladecek FX, Hrcek J, Klimes P, Konvicka M (2013) Interplay of succession and seasonality reflects resource utilization in an ephemeral habitat. Acta Oecol 46:17–24. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2012.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström B, Svensson B, Vessby K, Glimskär A (2001) Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodivers Conserv 10:1839–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowig P (1995) Habitat selection and offspring survival rate in three paracoprid dung beetles: the influence of soil type and soil moisture. Ecography 18:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier T, Bloor JM, Lumaret J-P (2015) Species-specific effects of dung beetle abundance on dung removal and leaf litter decomposition. Acta Oecol 69:31–34. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2015.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Koppel J, Rietkerk M (2000) Herbivore regulation and irreversible vegetation change in semi-arid grazing systems. Oikos 90:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Waal C, Kool A, Meijer SS, Kohi E, Heitkönig IM, de Boer WF, van Langevelde F, Grant RC, Peel MJ, Slotow R, de Knegt HJ, Prins HH, de Kroon H (2011) Large herbivores may alter vegetation structure of semi-arid savannas through soil nutrient mediation. Oecologia 165:1095–1107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura K (1999) Relation between plant density and arthropod density in cabbage fields. Res Popul Ecol 41:177–182. doi:10.1007/s101440050020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura K (2002) Biodiversity and stability of herbivore populations: influences of the spatial sparseness of food plants. Popul Ecol 44:33–40. doi:10.1007/s101440200004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda H (1987) Reproductive properties of two sympatric dung beetles, Aphodius haroldianus and A. elegans (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Res Popul Ecol 29:179–187. doi:10.1007/BF02538883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young OP (2015) Predation on dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): a literature review. Trans Am Entomol Soc 141:111–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Field work permits were granted by the Asinara National Park. We are very grateful for the logistic support of the Ente Parco of the Asinara National Park, especially Giovanni Careddu. We further thank Hannah Graen for her commitment during fieldwork. The Marianne and Dr. Fritz Walter Fischer-Foundation (Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft) is acknowledged for financial support (T192/23337/2012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia T. Treitler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

All applicable institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Communicated by Jens Wolfgang Dauber.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Treitler, J.T., Buse, J., Carpaneto, G.M. et al. Effects of dung-pad conditions and density on coprophagous beetle assemblages in a Mediterranean rangeland. Biodivers Conserv 26, 1431–1444 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1308-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1308-x

Keywords

Navigation