Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reduction of clinically irrelevant alarms in patient monitoring by adaptive time delays

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of high rates of false alarms in patient monitoring in anesthesiology and intensive care medicine is well known but remains unsolved. False alarms desensitize the medical staff, leading to ignored true alarms and reduced quality of patient care. A database of intra-operative monitoring data was analyzed to find characteristic alarm patterns. The original data were re-evaluated to find relevant events and to rate the severity of these events. Based on this analysis an adaptive time delay was developed that individually delays the alarms depending on the grade of threshold deviation. The conventional threshold algorithm led to 4893 alarms. 3515 (71.84 %) of these alarms were annotated as clinically irrelevant. In total 81.0 % of all clinically irrelevant alarms were caused by only mild and/or brief threshold violations. We implemented the new algorithm for selected parameters. These parameters equipped with adaptive validation delays led to 1729 alarms. 931 (53.85 %) alarms were annotated as clinically irrelevant. 632 alarms indicated the 645 clinically relevant events. The positive predictive value of occurring alarms improved from 28.16 % (conventional algorithm) to 46.15 % (new algorithm). 13 events were missed. The false positive alarm reduction rate of the algorithm ranged from 33 to 86.75 %. The overall reduction was 73.51 %. The implementation of this algorithm may be able to suppress a large percentage of false alarms. The effect of this approach has not been demonstrated but shows promise for reducing alarm fatigue. Its safety needs to be proven in a prospective study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seagull F, Sanderson P. Anesthesia alarms in context: an observational study. Hum Factors. 2001;43:66–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lawless ST. Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:981–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Graham KC, Cvach M. Monitor alarm fatigue: standardizing use of physiological monitors and decreasing nuisance alarms. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(1):28–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Takla G, Petre JH, Doyle DJ, Horibe M, Gopakumaran B. The problem of artifacts in patient monitor data during surgery: a clinical and methodological review. Anesth Analg. 2006;103(5):1196–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmid F, Goepfert MS, Kuhnt D, Eichhorn V, Diedrichs S, Reichenspurner H, Goetz AE, Reuter DA. The Wolf is crying in the OR: patient monitor and anesthesia workstation alarming patterns during cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(1):78–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mäkivirta A, Koski E, Kari A, Sukuvaara T. The median filter as a pre-processor for a patient monitor limit alarm system in intensive care. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1991;34:139–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Connor CW, Gohil B, Harrison MJ. Triggering of systolic arterial pressure alarms using statistics-based versus threshold alarms. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:131–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Görges M, Markewitz BA, Westenskow DR. Improving alarm performance in the medical intensive care unit using delays and clinical context. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1546–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bentley S, Murphy F, Dudley H. Perceived noise in surgical wards and an intensive care area: an objective analysis. BMJ. 1977;2:1503–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bell B. Monitor alarm fatigue. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(1):38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmid F, Goepfert M, Reuter DA. Patient monitoring alarms in the ICU and in the operating room. Crit Care. 2013;17:216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Topf M, Dillon E. Noise-induced stress as a predictor of burnout in critical care nurses. Heart Lung. 1988;17:567–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Minckley BB. A study of noise and its relationship to patients discomfort in the recovery room. Nurs Res. 1968;17:247–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagerman I, Rasmanis G, Blomkvist V, Ulrich R, Eriksen CA, Theorell T. Influence of intensive coronary care acoustics on the quality of care and physiological state of patients. Int J Cardiol. 2005;98:267–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an unrestricted Grant by Dräger & Co. KGaA Lübeck, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Hospital, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Felix Schmid, Matthias S. Goepfert, Alwin E. Goetz & Daniel A. Reuter

  2. Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA, Moislinger Allee 53, 23542, Lübeck, Germany

    Frank Franz & David Laule

  3. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Hospital, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Beate Reiter

Authors
  1. Felix Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias S. Goepfert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Franz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Laule
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Beate Reiter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alwin E. Goetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel A. Reuter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Schmid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Frank Franz and David Laule are employees of the Research Unit within Drägerwerk AG &Co. KGaA, which has affiliated companies selling products (e.g., patient monitors) proposed in the paper would be an advantageous feature which may have financial effects. All other authors report no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmid, F., Goepfert, M.S., Franz, F. et al. Reduction of clinically irrelevant alarms in patient monitoring by adaptive time delays. J Clin Monit Comput 31, 213–219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9808-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9808-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation