Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What are the socioeconomic implications of the value chain of biodiversity products? A case study in Northeastern Brazil

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The trade in biodiversity products has gained increasing importance in conservation and livelihood strategies. The aim of this study is to describe and analyze the socioeconomic aspects and dynamics of the production and commercialization of two important products of Brazilian biodiversity from the fruits of Caryocar coriaceum Wittm. and Dimorphandra gardneriana Tul. Interviews were conducted with who were involved in the various stages of value chains. Data were analyzed under an analytical/descriptive approach. It was found that the two value chains under study, although they share the same production environment and workforce, are different models of the commercial appropriation of the forest environment: one is related to local traditions, whereas the other seeks to meet an industry-related demand originating from a multinational pharmaceutical company. Harvesters become highly dependent on the trends imposed by these markets. Thus, it is clear that promoting these products as a conservation strategy requires an understanding of how their value chains arise, are established, and operate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albuquerque, U. P., Lucena, R. F. P., & Lins Neto, E. M. F.  (2014). Selection of research participants. In U. P. Albuquerque, R. F. P. Lucena, & L. V. F. C. Cunha (Eds.), Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer Protocols Handbooks.

  • Alexiades, M.N., & Shanley, P. (2004). Productos forestales, medios de subsistencia y conservación: estudios de caso sobre sistemas de manejo de productos forestales no maderables. Vol.3 - América Latina. Centro para la investigación florestal internacional (CIFOR), Indonésia.

  • APNE, Associação de Plantas do Nordeste. (2008). Estatística florestal da caatinga, Vol. 1, APNE, Natal.

  • Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Persona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, B., & Kusters, K. (2004). Non-timber forest product commercialisation: development and conservation lessons. In: Kusters, K., Belcher, B. (Eds.) Forest products, livelihoods and conservation: case studies of non-timber forest product systems. Vol. 1 – Ásia, 1–22. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Indonésia.

  • Belcher, B., & Schreckenberg, K. (2007). Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: a reality check. Development Policy Review, 25, 355–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker, A., Johnston, D., & Heinrich, M. (2012). Value chains of herbal medicines: research needs and key challenges in the context of ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 140, 624–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasil. (2000). Lei 9985/2000 que Institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidade de Conservação da Naturaza (SNUC). Brasília.

  • Brasil. (2009). Plano nacional de promoção das cadeias de produtos da sociobiodiversidade. Brasília: MDA, MMA, MDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, L. J., Gomes, M. A. O., & Jesus, N. B. (2010). Aspectos socioambientais da atividade extrativista de produtos florestais não-madeireiros: os casos da fava-d’anta (Dimorphandra sp.) e da aroeira-da-praia (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi). In U. P. Albuquerque & N. Hanazaki (Eds.), Árvores de valor e o valor das árvores: pontos de conexão (pp. 61–106). Recife: NUPEEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, C. U. (2007). A organização dos piquizeiros na Chapada do Araripe. Agriculturas, 4, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBAMA. (2006). Plano operativo de prevenção e combate aos incêndios florestais da floresta nacional de Araripe-Apodi. Crato: Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. (2010). Produção e vendas dos produtos e/ou serviços industriais, segundo as classes de atividades e a descrição dos produtos. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/industria/pia/produtos/produto2010/defaulttabzip_ods.shtm. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.

  • Ingram, V., Ndumbe, L., & Ewane, M. (2012). Small scale, high value: gnetum africanum and buchholzianum value chains in Cameroon. Small-Scale Forestry, 11, 539–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. (2009). Valuation of non-timber forest products value chains. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusters, K., & Belcher, B. (Eds.) (2004). Forest products, livelihoods and conservation: case studies of non-timber forest product systems. Vol. 1 – Ásia. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Indonésia.

  • Landim, P. L., & Costa, J. G. M. (2012). Dimorphandra gardneriana Tulasne (Fava d’anta) - Uma abordagem etnobotânica e riscos de extinção. Revista da Biologia, 9, 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lins Neto, E. M. F., Peroni, N., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2010). Traditional knowledge and management of Umbu (Spondias tuberosa, Anacardiaceae): an endemic species from the Semi–Arid Region of Northeastern Brazil. Economic Botany, 64, 11–21.

  • Maraseni, T. N., Shivakoti, G. P., Cockfield, G., & Apan, A. (2006). Nepalese non-timber forest products: an analysis of the equitability of profit distribution across a supply chain to India. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 5, 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. P., & Hirsch, E. (2000). Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: review and analysis of research. Indonédia: STM Grafika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, A., Lacuna-Richman, C., Keinänen, K., & Alsa, L. (2006). Ecological, socio-cultural, economic and political factors influencing the contribution of non-timber forest products to local livelihoods: case studies from Honduras and the Philippines. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 5, 249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, M. E. B., Guerra, N. B., Barros, L. M., & Alves, R. E. (2008). Aspectos agronômicos e de qualidade do pequi. Fortaleza: Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Pérez, M., Belcher, B., Achdiawan, R., Alexiades, M., Aubertin, C., Caballero, J., Campbell, B., Clement, C., et al. (2004). Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples. Ecology and Society, 9, 4. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art4. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. (2001). SAS PROC GLM users guide. Version 8.02. Cary: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, S., Paumgarten, F., Kassa, H., Husselman, M., & Zida, M. (2011). Opportunities for enhancing poor women’s socioeconomic empowerment in the value chains of three African Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs). International Forestry Review, 13, 36–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, R. R. V., Gomes, L. J., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2014). Methods and techniques for research on the supply chains of biodiversity products. In U. P. Albuquerque, L. V. F. C. Cunha, R. F. P. Lucena, & R. R. N. Alves (Eds.), Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology (pp. 335–347). New York: Springer Protocols Handbooks.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, R. R. V., Gomes, L. J., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2015). Plant extractivism in light of game theory: a case study in northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11:6.

  • Soldati, G. T., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2008). Nom-timber forest products: an overview. Functional Ecosystems and Communities, 2, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa-Júnior, J. R., Albuquerque, U. P., & Peroni, N. (2013). Traditional knowledge and management of Caryocar coriaceum wittm. (pequi) in the Brazilian savanna, northeastern Brazil. Economic Botany, 67, 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, G. C., Kubo, R., Guimarães, L., & Elisabetsky, E. (2006). An ethnobiological assessment of Rumohra adiantiformis (samambaia-preta) extractivism in Southern Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 2737–2746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, T., & Ndoye, O. (Eds). (2004). Forest Products, Livelihoods and Conservation. Case Studies of Non-Timber Forest Product Systems. Volume 2 – África. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Indonésia.

  • Tuxill, J., & Nabhan, G. P. (2001). Plantas comunidades y áreas protegidas: un guía para el manejo in situ. Uruguay: Nordan-Comunidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, A., & Ticktin, T. (2008). Regional variation in non-timber forest product harvest strategies, trade, and ecological impacts: the case of black dammar (Canarium strictum Roxb.) Use and conservation in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India. Ecology and Society, 13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art11. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.

  • Velde, D. W., Rushton, J., Schreckenberg, K., Marshall, E., Edouard, F., Newton, A., et al. (2006). Entrepreneurship in value chains of non-timber forest products. Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 725–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research received financial support of Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE); logistical support of the Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade – ICMBio, and the Fundação Araripe. In addition to these institutions, the authors would like to thank the harvesters from the Horizonte community and other local participants for accepting our presence and supporting us perform this study. To the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq) for the research productivity scholarship granted to UPA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque.

Ethics declarations

Authorization was obtained through the Biodiversity and Conservation System (SISBIO) to develop the study at the NCU. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP) through Plataforma Brasil. All involved in the research signed a statement of consent (TCLE) as established by Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council (CNS).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, R.R.V., Gomes, L.J. & Albuquerque, U.P. What are the socioeconomic implications of the value chain of biodiversity products? A case study in Northeastern Brazil. Environ Monit Assess 189, 64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5772-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5772-2

Keywords

Navigation