Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing a hybrid PSO–ANN model for estimating the ultimate bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock-socketed piles are commonly used in foundations built in soft ground, and thus, their bearing capacity is a key issue of universal concern in research, design and construction. The accurate prediction of the ultimate bearing capacity (Q u) of rock-socketed piles is a difficult task due to the uncertainty surrounding the various factors that affect this capacity. This study was aimed at developing an artificial neural network (ANN) model, as well as a hybrid model based on both particle swarm optimisation (PSO) and ANN, with which to predict the Q u of rock-socketed piles. PSO, a powerful population-based algorithm used in solving continuous and discrete optimisation problems, was here employed as a robust global search algorithm to determine ANN weights and biases and thereby improve model performance. To achieve the study aims, 132 piles socketed in various rock types as part of the Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit project, Malaysia, were investigated. Based on previous related investigations, parameters with the most influence on Q u were identified and utilised in the modelling procedure of the intelligent systems. After constructing and modelling these systems, selected performance indices including the coefficient of determination (R 2), root-mean-square error, variance account for and total ranking were used to identify the best models and compare the obtained results. This analysis revealed that the hybrid PSO–ANN model offers a higher degree of accuracy compared to conventional ANN for predicting the Q u of rock-socketed piles. However, the developed model would be most useful in the preliminary stages of pile design and should be used with caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coyle HM, Castello RR (1981) New design correlations for piles in sand. J Geotech Eng ASCE 107:965–986

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shahin MA (2010) Intelligent computing for modeling axial capacity of pile foundations. Can Geotech J 47(2):230–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kordjazi A, Nejad FP, Jaksa MB (2014) Prediction of ultimate axial load-carrying capacity of piles using a support vector machine based on CPT data. Comput Geotech 55:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Randolph MF (2003) Science and empiricism in pile foundation design. Geotechnique 53(10):847–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Likins G, Rausche F (2004) Correlation of CAPWAP with static load tests. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on the application of stress wave theory to piles, The Institute of Engineers Malaysia

  6. Momeni E, Nazir R, Jahed Armaghani D, Maizir H (2014) Prediction of pile bearing capacity using a hybrid genetic algorithm-based ANN. Measurement 57:122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American Society for Testing and Materials (2010) Standard test method for high-strain dynamic testing of piles, D 4945-08, Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 4, 08

  8. Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2001) Artificial neural network application in geotechnical engineering. Aust Geomech 36:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gokceoglu C, Zorlu K (2004) A fuzzy model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity of a problematic rock. Eng Appl Artif Intell 17(1):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2007) Evaluation of blast-induced ground vibration predictors. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(2):116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yagiz S, Gokceoglu C, Sezer E, Iplikci S (2009) Application of two non-linear prediction tools to the estimation of tunnel boring machine performance. Eng Appl Artif Intell 22(4):808–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mishra DA, Basu A (2013) Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock materials by index tests using regression analysis and fuzzy inference system. Eng Geol 160:54–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh R, Vishal V, Singh TN, Ranjith PG (2013) A comparative study of generalized regression neural network approach and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems for prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rocks. Neural Comput Appl 23(2):499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Verma AK, Singh TN (2011) Intelligent systems for ground vibration measurement: a comparative study. Eng Comput 27(3):225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yagiz S, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C (2012) Artificial neural networks and nonlinear regression techniques to assess the influence of slake durability cycles on the prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity for carbonate rocks. Int J Numer Anal Methods 36:1636–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jahed Armaghani D, Mohamad ET, Hajihassani M, Yagiz S, Motaghedi H (2015) Application of several non-linear prediction tools for estimating uniaxial compressive strength of granitic rocks and comparison of their performances. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-015-0410-5

    Google Scholar 

  17. Singh R, Kainthola A, Singh TN (2012) Estimation of elastic constant of rocks using an ANFIS approach. Appl Soft Comput 12(1):40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shirani Faradonbeh R, Monjezi M, Jahed Armaghani D (2015) Genetic programing and non-linear multiple regression techniques to predict backbreak in blasting operation. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-015-0404-3

    Google Scholar 

  19. Monjezi M, Hasanipanah M, Khandewal M (2013) Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam Iran, by artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 22:1637–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marto A, Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Tonnizam Mohamad E, Makhtar AM (2014) A novel approach for blast-induced flyrock prediction based on imperialist competitive algorithm and artificial neural network. Sci World J, Article ID 643715

  21. Ocak I, Seker SE (2013) Calculation of surface settlements caused by EPBM tunneling using artificial neural network, SVM, and Gaussian processes. Environ Earth Sci 70(3):1263–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahdevari S, Shahriar K, Yagiz S, Shirazi MA (2014) A support vector regression model for predicting tunnel boring machine penetration rates. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 72:214–229

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chan WT, Chow YK, Liu LF (1995) Neural network: an alternative to pile driving formulas. Comput Geotech 17(2):135–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee IM, Lee JH (1996) Prediction of pile bearing capacity using artificial neural networks. Comput Geotech 18(3):189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abu-Kiefa M (1998) General regression neural networks for driven piles in cohesionless soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(12):1177–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pal M, Deswal S (2008) Modeling pile capacity using support vector machines and generalized regression neural network. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(7):1021–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2009) Recent advances and future challenges for artificial neural systems in geotechnical engineering applications. Adv Artif Neural Syst. doi:10.1155/2009/308239

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jianbin Z, Jiewen T, Yongqiang S (2010) An ANN model for predicting level ultimate bearing capacity of PHC pipe pile. Earth and Space, pp 3168–3176

  29. Alkroosh I, Nikraz H (2012) Predicting axial capacity of driven piles in cohesive soils using intelligent computing. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(3):618–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eberhart RC, Shi Y (1998) Evolving artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the international conference on neural networks and brain, pp PL5–PL13

  31. Tonnizam Mohamad E, Jahed Armaghani D, Momeni E, Alavi Nezhad Khalil Abad SV (2014) Prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of soft rocks: a PSO-based ANN approach. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-014-0638-0

    Google Scholar 

  32. Momeni E, Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Amin MFM (2015) Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rock samples using hybrid particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural networks. Measurement 60:50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ISRM (2007) In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics

  34. Smith EAL (1960) Pile-driving analysis by the wave equation. J Soil Mech Found Div 4:35–61

    Google Scholar 

  35. Goble GG, Rausche F, Moses F (1970) Dynamics studies on the bearing capacity of piles. Final report to the Ohio department of highways, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

  36. Fellenius BH (1984) Wave equation analysis and dynamic monitoring. Deep Found J 1:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tu J, Tang A (2011) Grey correlation analysis of bearing capacity of rock-socketed pile in soft soil area. In: 2011 international conference on multimedia technology (ICMT), IEEE, pp 1081–1085

  38. Zhang L, Einstein HH (1998) End bearing capacity of drilled shafts in rock. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(7):574–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jahed Armaghani D, Tonnizam Mohamad E, Momeni E, Narayanasamy MS, Mohd Amin MF (2014) An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for predicting unconfined compressive strength and Young’s modulus: a study on Main Range granite. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-014-0687-4

    Google Scholar 

  40. Monjezi M, Mehrdanesh A, Malek A, Khandelwal M (2013) Evaluation of effect of blast design parameters on flyrock using artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 23(2):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Monjezi M, Ahmadi Z, Varjani AY, Khandelwal M (2013) Backbreak prediction in the Chadormalu iron mine using artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 23(3–4):1101–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Tawadrous AS, Katsabanis PD (2007) Prediction of surface crown pillar stability using artificial neural networks. Int J Numer Anal Methods 31(7):917–931

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2009) Correlating static properties of coal measures rocks with P-wave velocity. Int J Coal Geol 79:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jahed Armaghani D, Mohamad ET, Hajihassani M, Abad SANK, Marto A, Moghaddam MR (2015) Evaluation and prediction of flyrock resulting from blasting operations using empirical and computational methods. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-015-0402-5

    Google Scholar 

  46. Swingler K (1996) Applying neural networks: a practical guide. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  47. Looney CG (1996) Advances in feed-forward neural networks: demystifying knowledge acquiring black boxes. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 8(2):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ceryan N, Okkan U, Kesimal A (2013) Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of carbonate rocks using artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 68(3):807–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1994) Training feed forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5:861–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Baheer I (2000) Selection of methodology for modeling hysteresis behavior of soils using neural networks. J Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 5(6):445–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Kayabasi A (2006) Estimation of rock modulus: for intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:224–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hecht-Nielsen R (1987) Kolmogorov’s mapping neural network existence theorem. In: Proceedings of the first IEEE international conference on neural networks, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 11–14

  53. Ripley BD (1993) Statistical aspects of neural networks. In: Barndoff-Neilsen OE, Jensen JL, Kendall WS (eds) Networks and chaos-statistical and probabilistic aspects. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 40–123

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Paola JD (1994) Neural network classification of multispectral imagery. MSc thesis, The University of Arizona, USA

  55. Wang C (1994) A theory of generalization in learning machines with neural application. PhD thesis, The University of Pennsylvania, USA

  56. Masters T (1994) Practical neural network recipes in C++. Academic Press, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Kaastra I, Boyd M (1996) Designing a neural network for forecasting financial and economic time series. Neurocomputing 10:215–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kanellopoulas I, Wilkinson GG (1997) Strategies and best practice for neural network image classification. Int J Remote Sens 18:711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Caudill M (1988) Neural networks primer part III. Al Expert 3(6):53–59

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks (Perth, Australia), IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, pp 1942–1948

  61. Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T (2007) Particle swarm optimization an overview. Swarm Intell 1:33–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Bansal JC, Singh PK, Saraswat M, Verma A, Jadon SS, Abraham A (2011) Inertia Weight strategies in particle swarm optimization. Third World Congress on nature and biologically inspired computing. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 640–647

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yagiz S, Karahan H (2011) Prediction of hard rock TBM penetration rate using particle swarm optimization. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(3):427–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Gordan B, Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Monjezi M (2015) Prediction of seismic slope stability through combination of particle swarm optimization and neural network. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-015-0400-7

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bashir ZA, El-Hawary ME (2009) Applying wavelets to short-term load forecasting using PSO-based neural networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(1):20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mendes R, Cortes P, Rocha M, Neves J (2002) Particle swarms for feed forward neural net training. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international joint conference on neural networks, Honolulu, HI, USA, 12–17 May 2002, pp 1895–1899

  67. Kennedy J, Clerc M (2006) Standard PSO 2006. http://www.particleswarm.info/Standard-PSO-2006.c

  68. Clerc M (2011) Standard particle swarm optimisation, from 2006 to 2011. clerc.maurice.free.fr/pso/SPSO_descriptions.pdf (2011-07-13 version)

  69. Zorlu K, Gokceoglu C, Ocakoglu F, Nefeslioglu HA, Acikalin S (2008) Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of sandstones using petrography-based models. Eng Geol 96(3–4):141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(1):58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Sohaei H, Mohamad ET, Marto A (2014) Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization. Appl Acoust 80:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Mohamad ET, Marto A, Noorani SA (2014) Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization. Arab J Geosci 7:5383–5396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Yang Y, Zang O (1997) A hierarchical analysis for rock engineering using artificial neural networks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 30:207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) for all their support that made this research possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Skudai, 81310, Johor, Malaysia

    Danial Jahed Armaghani, Raja Shahrom Nizam Shah Bin Raja Shoib & Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid

  2. School of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Koohyar Faizi

Authors
  1. Danial Jahed Armaghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raja Shahrom Nizam Shah Bin Raja Shoib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Koohyar Faizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danial Jahed Armaghani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahed Armaghani, D., Shoib, R.S.N.S.B.R., Faizi, K. et al. Developing a hybrid PSO–ANN model for estimating the ultimate bearing capacity of rock-socketed piles. Neural Comput & Applic 28, 391–405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2072-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2072-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation