Skip to main content
Log in

Lithostratigraphic contact – a significant site for hydrogeological investigation in crystalline fractured-rock terrains

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating the hydrogeologic control of fractured aquifers in hard crystalline and metamorphosed rocks is challenging due to complexity in the development of secondary porosity. The present study in the Precambrian metamorphic terrain in and around the Balarampur of Purulia district, West Bengal, India, aims to estimate the hydrogeologic significance of lithostratigraphic contacts using fracture characteristics obtained from surface bedrock exposures supported by hydrological data from the existing dugwells. This study involves the domain-wise analysis of the frequencies of fractures that control the fracture-porosity. The domain-wise study reveals higher fracture-frequencies adjacent to the lithostratigraphic contacts. The concurrence of lithostratigraphic contacts with the occurrences of high-discharging wells and also with the deep weathered zone in low-lying areas is clearly established, thus assigning the lithostratigraphic contact as hydrogeologically significant. An increase in frequencies of the fractures within the ‘influence zone’ of the lithocontact, is clearly visible. Among those fractures, particularly, which make the angle greater than the ‘limiting angle’ with the lithocontact are characterised by increased frequencies. However, brittle rocks like quartz biotite granite gneisses, phyllite and epidiorite show high porosity of fracture, within the ‘influence zone’ of the lithostratigraphic contact. Enhanced deepening of the weathered-zone at lower topographic region may perhaps be a plausible explanation for this increased fracture-porosity at lithocontact to assign it as a hydrogeologically significant transmissive zone within fractured rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya T and Prasad R 2014 Hydrodynamic study of the weathered zone of hardrock aquifers from dugwell data; Nat. Resour. Res. 23 (3) 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya T and Basumallik S 2012 Analysis of lineament swarms in a Precambrian metamorphic rocks in India ; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 121 (2) 453–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya T, Nag S K and Basumallik S 2012 Hydraulic significance of fracture correlated lineaments in Precambrian rocks in Purulia District, West Bengal; J. Geol. Soc. India 80 (5) 723–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baidya T K 1992 Apatite-magnetite deposit in the Chhotanagpur Gneissic Complex, Panrkidih area, Purulia District, West Bengal; Indian J. Geol. 64 (1) 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks D and Robins N 2002 An introduction to groundwater in crystalline bedrock; Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya D S 1989 Ductile shear zone in Purulia, WB, India; J. Geol. 61 172–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutt D F, Diggins P and Mabee S 2010 A field study (Massachusetts, USA) of the factors controlling the depth of groundwater flow systems in crystalline fractured-rock terrain; Hydrogeol. J. 18 1839–1854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braathen A 1999 Kinematics of post-Caledonian polyphase brittle faulting in the Sunnfjord region, western Norway; Tectonophys. 302 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook P G 2003 A guide to regional groundwater flow in fractured rock aquifers; CSIRO Land and Water, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford T J and Brackett D A 1995 Ground water in igneous and metamorphic rocks; low-angle lithological contacts related to site-specific control of ground water occurrence; Proceedings Georgia Water Resources Conference, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

  • Dasgupta S 2004 Modelling ancient orogens – An example from North Singhbhum Mobile Belt; GSI Spec. Publ. 84 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewandel B, Lachassagne P, Wyns R, Maréchal J C and Krishnamurthy N S 2006 A generalized 3-D geological and hydrogeological conceptual model of granite aquifers controlled by single or multiphase weathering; J. Hydrol. 330 260–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewandel B, Lachassagne P, Zaidi F K and Chandra S 2011 A conceptual hydrodynamic model of a geological discontinuity in hard rock aquifers: Example of a quartz reef in granitic terrain in south India; J. Hydrol. 405 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewandel B, Perrin J, Ahmed S., Aulong S, Hrkal Z, Lachassagne P, Samad M and Massuel S 2010 Development of a tool for managing groundwater resources in semi-arid hard rock regions. Application to a rural watershed in south India; Hydrol. Process. 24 2784–2797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deyell C and Sherlock R L 2003 Iron-formation-hosted gold occurrence in the Elice Hills area, Committee Bay belt, Nunavut, Geological Survey of Canada; Curr. Res. 200–C16.

  • Everitt R, McMurry J, Brown A and Davison C 1996 Geology of the Lac du Bonnet batholith, inside and out: AECL’s Underground Research Laboratory, Southeastern Manitoba (Field B5) 27 209.

  • Geological Quadrangle Map 73I 1948 GSI, Calcutta.

  • Ghose N C 1983 Geology, tectonics and evolution of the Chhotanagpur granite gneiss complex, eastern India; Recent Res. Geol. 10 211–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A and Basu A 2000 North Singhbhum Proterozoic mobile belt eastern India – A review; GSI Spec. Publ. 55 195–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen H and Braathen A 2006 Effects of fracture-lineaments and in situ rock stresses on groundwater flow in hard rocks: A case study from Sunnfjord, Western Norway; Hydrogeol. J 14 444–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katti V J, Sen J and Bhatt A K 2010 Uranium potentiality of South Purulia Shear Zone in Eastern Indian Shield; Technical Meeting on Low Grade Uranium Ore, 29–31 March 2010, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria.

  • Lachassagne P, Wyns R and Dewandel B 2011 The fracture permeability of hard rock aquifers is due neither to tectonics, nor to unloading, but to weathering processes; Terra Nova. 23 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladeira F L and Price N J 1980 Relationship between fracture spacing and bed thickness; J. Struct. Geol. 3 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand H E 1988 Piedmont and Blue Ridge, Region 21 (chapter 24), In: The geology of North America (eds) Back W B, Rosenshein J S and Seaber P R, Vol. O-2: Hydrogeology, Boulder, Colorado: The Geological Society of America, Inc.

  • Mabee S B and Hardcastle K C 1997 Analyzing outcrop-scale fracture features to supplement investigations of bedrock aquifers; J. Struct. Geol. 5 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie D M 2002 An integrated structural and hydrogeologic investigation of the fracture system in the Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group, southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia [M.Sc. thesis]: Burnaby, Simon Fraser University, 358p.

  • Mazumder S K 1988 Crustal evolution of Chhotanagpur gneissic complex and the mica belt of Bihar; In: Precambrian of the Eastern Indian Shield (ed.) Mukhopadhyay D; Geol. Soc. India Memoir 8 49–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal N C and Singh V S 2004 A new approach to delineate the groundwater recharge zone in hard rock terrain; Curr. Sci. 85 (5) 658–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morland G 1997 Petrology, lithology, bedrock structures, glaciation and sea level; Important factors for groundwater yield and composition of Norwegian bedrock boreholes? Norges Geol. Unders. Rapport 97 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neretnieks I 1985 Transport in fractured rocks; In: Proceeding of hydrogeology of rocks of low permeability; Memoir Int. Assoc. Hydrogeol. 17 (2) 301–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsi C M 2004 Structural topographic, and Hydrogeological Analysis of the Montpelier Quadrangle: Central Vermont; Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts, Department of Geology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont.

  • Sarkar A N 1988 Tectonic evolution of the Chhotanagpur plateau and Gondwana basins in Eastern India: An interpretation based on supra-subduction geological processes; In: Precambrian of the Eastern Indian Shield (ed.) Mukhopadhyay D; Geol. Soc. India Memoir 8 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta D K and Sarkar S N 1964 Structure of the granitic rock and associated metamorphites of the area around Muri-Silli–Jhalida, Ranchi and Purulia districts, India; 22nd Int. Geol. Cong. 4 374–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • White B A and Burbey T J 2007 Evidence for structurally controlled recharge in the Blue Ridge Province, Virginia, USA; Hydrogeol. J. 15 (5) 929–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. S K Nag and Prof. S Basumallik (retired) of Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India, for their valuable advice, used in parts of this study. Authors are thankful to the corresponding editor, Dr. M Jayananda and two anonymous referees for their suggestions that improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tapas Acharya.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: M Jayananda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acharya, T., Prasad, R. Lithostratigraphic contact – a significant site for hydrogeological investigation in crystalline fractured-rock terrains. J Earth Syst Sci 126, 15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0784-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0784-9

Keywords

Navigation