Skip to main content
Log in

A solution to the ORPD problem and critical analysis of the results

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most important conditions for economic and secure operation of electric power system is the optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD). The ORPD is achieving by appropriate coordination of the equipments which manage the reactive power flows to minimize the real power loss and/or improve the voltage profile of the power system. Mathematically, the ORPD problem can be formulated as a nonlinear optimization problem with constraints. In this paper, a hybrid PSOGSA algorithm is proposed for solving the ORPD problem. The results obtained by hybrid PSOGSA on standard IEEE 30-bus and IEEE 118-bus test systems are compared with other meta-heuristic optimization methods. In addition, a critical review of the ORPD results published in the recent literature is presented also.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Radosavljević J, Klimenta D, Jevtić M, Arsić N (2015) Optimal power flow using a hybrid optimization algorithm of particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm. Electr Power Compon Syst 43(17):1958–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Radosavljević J, Jevtić M (2016) Solution of optimal reactive power dispatch by a hybrid GSA-SQP algorithm. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika 22(3):3–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abou El-Ela AA, Abido MA, Spea SR (2011) Diferential evolution algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch. Electr Power Syst Res 81(2):458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basu M (2016) Quasi-oppositional differential evolution for optimal reactive power dispatch. Electr Power Energy Syst 78:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu QH, Cao YJ, Wen JY (1998) Optimal reactive power dispatch using an adaptive genetic algorithm. Electr Power Energy Syst 20(8):563–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharya A, Chattopadhyay PK (2010) Solution of optimal reactive power flow using biogeography-based optimization. Int J Electr Comput Energ Electron Commun Eng 4(3):621–629

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mahadevan K, Kannan PS (2010) Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization for reactive power dispatch. Appl Soft Comput 10:641–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh RP, Mukherjee V, Ghosal SP (2015) Optimal reactive power dispatch by particle swarm optimization with an aging leader and challengers. Appl Soft Comput 29:298–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duman S, Sonmez Y, Guvenc U, Yorukeren N (2012) Optimal reactive power dispatch using a gravitational search algorithm. IET Gener Transm Distrib 6(6):563–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw B, Mukherjee V, Ghoshal SP (2014) Solution of reactive power dispatch of power systems by an opposition-based gravitational search algorithm. Electr Power Energy Syst 55:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mukherjee A, Mukherjee V (2015) Solution of optimal reactive power dispatch by chaotic krill herd algorithm. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9(15):2351–2362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khazali AH, Kalantar M (2011) Optimal reactive power dispatch based on harmony search algorithm. Electr Power Energy Syst 33:684–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mandal B, Roy PK (2013) Optimal reactive power dispatch using quasi-oppositional teaching learning based optimization. Electr Power Energy Syst 53:123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frank S, Steponavice I, Rebennack S (2012) Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey I—formulations and deterministic methods. Energy Syst 3(3):221–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghasemi M, Ghavidal S, Ghanbarian MM, Habibi A (2014) A new hybrid algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch problem with discrete and continuous control variables. Appl Soft Comput 22:126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khorsandi A, Alimardani A, Vahidi B, Hosseinian SH (2011) Hybrid shuffled frog leaping algorithm and Nelder–Mead simplex search for optimal reactive power dispatch. IET Gener Transm Distrib 5(2):249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajan A, Malakar T (2015) Optimal reactive power dispatch using hybrid Nelder–Mead simplex based firefly algorithm. Electr Power Energy Syst 66:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirjalili S, Hashim SZM (2010) A new hybrid PSOGSA algorithm for function optimization. In: International conference on computer and information application (ICCIA 2010), 03 Dec–05 Dec 2010. Tianjin, China, pp 374–377

  19. Mirjalli S, Hashim SZM, Sardroudi HM (2012) Training feedforward neural networks using hybrid particle swarm and gravitational search algorithm. Appl Math Comput 218:11125–11137

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun S, Peng Q (2014) A hybrid PSO-GSA strategy for high-dimensional optimization and microarray data clustering. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on information and automation (ICIA), 28–30 July 2014, pp 41–46

  21. Khadanga RK, Satapathy JK (2015) Time delay approach for PSS and SSSC based coordinated controller design using hybrid PSO-GSA algorithm. Electr Power Energy Syst 71:262–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Radosavljević J, Arsić N, Jevtić M (2014) Optimal power flow using hybrid PSOGSA algorithm. In: 55th International scientific conference of Riga Technical University on Power and Electrical Engineering (RTUCON2014), October 14–17, 2014. Riga, Latvia, pp 136–140

  23. Radosavljević J (2016) A solution to the combined economic and emission dispatch using hybrid PSOGSA algorithm. Appl Artif Intell 30(5):445–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-pour H, Saryazdi S (2009) GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Inf Sci 179:2232–2248

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee KY, Park YM, Ortiz JL (1985) A united approach to optimal real and reactive power dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 104(5):1147–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee KY, Park YM, Ortiz JL (1984) Optimal real and reactive power dispatch. Electr Power Syst Res 7:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sánchez CE, Thomas RJ (2011) MATPOWER: steady-state operations, planning and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(1):12–19. http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/

  28. The IEEE 118-Bus Test System [online]. https://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/pf118/pg_tca118bus.htm

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia under research Grant TR 33046.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan Radosavljević.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radosavljević, J., Jevtić, M. & Milovanović, M. A solution to the ORPD problem and critical analysis of the results. Electr Eng 100, 253–265 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0503-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0503-1

Keywords

Navigation