Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing Different Schemes of Agricultural Wastewater Lagooning: Depuration Performance and Microbiological Characteristics

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the number of factors influencing depuration efficiency and energy requirement is high, the choice of the most suitable aeration scheme in aerated lagooning systems treating agricultural wastewater is a difficult task. This study provides technicians and researchers with guidelines on air diffuser position, presence of inoculum and characteristics of microbial mass, focusing organic matter degradation and energy performance of aerated ponds treating citrus processing wastewater. Four experimental batch tanks were set up: three tanks were subject to low air flow rates and times, while a fourth tank was not aerated. The organic matter degradation in the aerated tanks was on average six times higher compared to the non-aerated tank. Positioning the air diffuser at mid-depth and consequent separation of tank contents into two layers determined a decrease in the depuration performance, presumably due to the reduced transfer of oxygen to wastewater. Although the ability of spontaneous microflora to adapt to essential oil concentrations up to 1400 mL L−1 was detected, the effect of inoculum (50% of wastewater with spontaneous microflora already adapted to high essential oil concentration) was not noticeable. Overall, the results of the investigation confirm the suitability of aerated lagoons subject to fine bubble aeration also for agricultural wastewater depuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA, AWWA and WEF. (1998). APHA, AWWA and WEF, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington: APHA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakkali, F., Averbeck, S., Averbeck, D., & Idaomar, M. (2008). Biological effects of essential oils—a review. Food Chemistry and Toxicology, 46, 446–475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bombino, G., Tamburino, V., Zema, D.A, & Zimbone, S.M. (2009). Depuration of citrus processing wastewater in aerated biological ponds. In Proceedings of the Congress of the Italian Association of Agricultural Engineers. Ischia (Italy), 12–16 September.

  • Burak, D., & Orhan, Y. (2002). Two-phase anaerobic digestion processes: a review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 77(7), 743–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. J., Chong, M. F., Law, C. L., & Hassell, D. G. (2009). A review on anaerobic–aerobic treatment of industrial and municipal wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 155, 1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K.Y., Cord-Ruwisch, R., & Ho, G. (2011). Rotatable bio-electrochemical contactor for energy efficient treatment of organic wastestreams. In Proceedings of the international conference on solid waste 2011 “Moving towards sustainable resource management”, Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China, 2 – 6 May.

  • Di Giacomo, A., & Calvarano, I. (1987). Il problema degli effluenti dell’industria agrumaria e le prospettive di utilizzazione degli scarti di lavorazione. Proceedings of the Congress “Ambiente e risorse alternative nell’industria agro-alimentare”, Università della Calabria, Italy, May 16 (in Italian).

  • Hodkinson, B. J., Williams, J. B., & Ha, T. N. (1998). Effects of plastic support media on the diffusion of air in a submerged aerated filter. Water and Environment Journal, 12, 188–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jail, A., Boukhoubza, F., Nejmeddine, A., Duarte, J. C., Sayadi, S., & Hassani, L. (2010). Traitement des effluents d’huileries par un procédé combinant un traitement intensif (Jet_Loop Reactor) suivi d’un traitement extensif (bassins de stabilisation). Environmental Technology, 31, 533–543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juanicó, M., & Milstein, A. (2004). Semi-intensive treatment plants for wastewater reuse in irrigation. Water Science and Technology, 50(2), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, D. A. (1999). Citrus processing (2nd ed.). Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, A. G. (1983). Removal of peel oil from citrus peel press liquors before anaerobic digestion. Environmental Tecnology Letters, 4, 65–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mara, D. D., & Pearson, H. W. (1998). Design manual for waste stabilization pond in Mediterranean countries. Leeds (United Kingdom): Lagoon Technology International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masotti L. 2002. Depurazione delle acque. Ed. Il Sole 24 ore Edagricole, Bologna.

  • Metcalf & Eddy Inc. (2003). Wastewater engineering treatment and reuse (4th ed.). New York: McGrawHill.

  • Moura, A., Tacao, M., Henriques, I., Dias, J., Ferreira, P., & Correia, A. (2009). Characterization of bacterial diversity in two aerated lagoons of a wastewater treatment plant using PCR–DGGE analysis. Microbiological Research, 164, 560–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, M. W. (1990). Citrus processing waste prevention, handling and treatment. Lake Wales: Citrus world.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, B., & Flotats, X. (2014). Citrus essential oils and their influence on the anaerobic digestion process: an overview. Waste Management, 34, 2063–2079.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salgot, M., Huertas, E., Weber, S., Dott, W., & Hollender, J. (2006). Wastewater reuse and risk: definition of key objectives. Desalination, 187, 29–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. C., & Veldhuis, M. K. (1966). Rapid estimation of recoverable oil in citrus juices by bromate titration. Journal of AOAC International, 49, 628–633.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamburino, V., Zema, D.A., & Zimbone, S.M. (2007). Depuration processes of citrus wastewater. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium of CIGR Section VI “Food and agricultural products: processing and innovations”. Naples (Italy), 24–26 September.

  • Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F.L., Burton, F., & Stensel, H.D. (2002). Wastewater engineering. Treatment and reuse. Inc Metcalf & Eddy, McGraw-Hill Company, New York.

  • Trias, M., Hu, Z., Mortula, M. M., Gordon, R. J., & Gagnon, G. A. (2004). Impact of seasonal variation on treatment of swine wastewater. Environmental Technology, 25, 775–781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zema, D. A., Andiloro, S., Bombino, G., Tamburino, V., Sidari, R., & Caridi, A. (2012). Depuration in aerated ponds of citrus processing wastewater with a high concentration of essential oils. Environmental Technology, 33, 1255–1260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the PRIN 2008 “Depuration and Reuse of Citrus Processing Wastewater” (Scientific responsible Vincenzo Tamburino).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demetrio Antonio Zema.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zema, D.A., Andiloro, S., Bombino, G. et al. Comparing Different Schemes of Agricultural Wastewater Lagooning: Depuration Performance and Microbiological Characteristics. Water Air Soil Pollut 227, 439 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3132-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3132-4

Keywords

Navigation