Skip to main content
Log in

“The Right to Self-determination”: Right and Laws Between Means of Oppression and Means of Liberation in the Discourse of the Indigenous Movement of Ecuador

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 1970s and 1980s meant an ethnic politicization of the indigenous movement in Ecuador, until this moment defined largely as a class-based movement of indigenous peasants. The indigenous organizations started to conceptualize indigenous peoples as nationalities with their own economic, social, cultural and legal structures and therefore with the right to autonomy and self-determination. Based on this conceptualization, the movement developed demands for a pluralist reform of state and society in order to install a plurinational state with wide degrees of autonomy and participation for indigenous nationalities. A part of those demands was the double strategy to fight for legal pluralism while already installing it at the local level. Even if some degrees of legal pluralism have been recognized in Ecuador since the mid-1990s, in practice, the local de facto practice prevails until today. Another central part of the demand for plurinationality is the representation of indigenous peoples in the legislative organs of the state, developing since their first appearance in the 1940s in a complex way. This article will analyze the development of right-based demands within the discourse of the indigenous movement in Ecuador, the visions of the implied state-reform and the organizational and political background and implication they have. Based on an analysis of the central texts of the indigenous organizations, conceptualizations of rights and laws and their appropriation within an autonomist discourse and a local practice will be highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. With the exception of the Constitution of 1945 that included a functional representative for the indigenous peoples in the parliament—but was replaced already in 1946 by another Constitution [2].

  2. This idea has been developed in more depth in Altmann [1].

  3. Unión de Nativos de la Amazonía Ecuadoriana, in English: Union of Natives of the Ecuadorian Amazon. It should be remarked that the concept of territory is of more importance for the Amazonian organizations, given that it is -with few exceptions- only there where ethnically defined territories do still exist.

  4. Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador, Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas de Ecuador.

  5. This argument re-appears regularily, for instance in CONAIE [8].

  6. Confederación Nacional de Organizaciones Campesinas, Indígenas y Negras, National Confederation of Peasant, Indigenous and Black Organizations.

  7. National Direction of Intercultural Bilingual Education, Dirección Nacional de Educación Intercultural Bilingüe.

  8. Development Council of the Peoples and Nationalities of Ecuador, Consejo de Desarrollo de los Pueblos y Nacionalidades del Ecuador.

  9. A much more detailled presentation of the legal structures of the indigenous peoples can be found in Pérez [30].

  10. The author participated in this workshop. The following information is taken from his field diary.

  11. This has been studied in depth by Krupa [23].

  12. In Spanish: Movimiento de Unidad Plurinacional Pachakutik—Nuevo País.

References

  1. Altmann, Philipp. 2013. El Sumak Kawsay en el discurso del movimiento indígena ecuatoriano. INDIANA 30: 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, Marc, and Silvia Tutillo. 2009. Historia agraria y social de Cayambe. Quito: FLACSO, Abya Yala.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benford, Robert, and David Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual review of sociology 26: 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Büschges, Christian. 2009. Políticas de identidad entre integración y autonomía: movimiento indígena, sociedad y Estado en Ecuador y Nepal desde una perspectiva comparada y transnacional. In Los Andes en movimiento. Identidad y poder en el nuevo paisaje político, ed. Pablo Ospina, Olaf Kaltmeier, and Christian Büschges, 41–63. Corporación Editora Nacional/Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar: Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clavero, Bartolomé. 2008. Geografía jurídica de América Latina. Pueblos Indígenas entre constituciones mestizas. Mexico: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Comisión Especial de Asuntos Indígenas. 1988. Proyecto de Ley de Nacionalidades Indígenas. Quito: Congreso Nacional de la República del Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CONAIE. 1989. Las nacionalidades indígenas en el Ecuador: Nuestro Proceso organizativo. Quito: Tincui/CONAIE, Abya-Yala.

    Google Scholar 

  8. CONAIE. 1994. Proyecto Político de la CONAIE. Quito: CONAIE.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CONAIE. 1997. Las nacionalidades indígenas y el Estado Plurinacional. Quito: CONAIE.

    Google Scholar 

  10. CONAIE. 2001. Proyecto Político de las Nacionalidades y Pueblos del Ecuador. http://www.conaie.org/congresos-de-la-conaie/ii-congreso-ed-la-conaie/99-proyecto-politico-de-las-nacionalidades-y-pueblos-del-ecuador?format=pdf.

  11. CONAIE. 2004. Propuesta de Ley de Biodiversidad. Quito: CONAIE.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CONAIE. 2007. La CONAIE frente a la Asamblea Constituyente. Propuesta de nueva constitución- desde la CONAIE- para la construcción de un Estado Plurinacional, Unitario, Soberano, Incluyente, Equitativo y Laíco. http://www.cebem.org/cmsfiles/archivos/principios-lineamientos-conaie.pdf. Currently offline.

  13. CONAIE. 2010. Proyecto de Ley de Circunscripción Territorial. Quito: CONAIE.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. 1998.

  15. Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. 2008.

  16. Coordinadora Agraria Nacional (CAN). 1994. Proyecto de Ley Agraria Integral. Quito: FEPP.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Federación de Centros Shuar. 1976. Solución original a un problema actual. Sucúa: Federación Shuar.

    Google Scholar 

  18. FENOCIN. 1999. Hacia el nuevo Milenio. Porque en el campo está la fuerza del Desarrollo de la Identidad y la Vida. N.p.: FENOCIN.

  19. FENOCIN. 2004. Noveno Congreso Ambato, 20-22 de mayo de 2004. Quito: FENOCIN.

    Google Scholar 

  20. González Casanova, Pablo, and Marcos Roitman Rosenmann (eds.). 1996. Democracia y Estado multiétnico en América Latina. Mexico: UNAM, Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Inman, Derek. 2014. The cross-fertilization of human rights norms and indigenous peoples in Africa: From endorois and beyond. The International Indigenous Policy Journal 5(4). Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol5/iss4/5.

  22. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censos (INEC). 2010. Censo de Poblacion y Vivienda 2010. http://redatam.inec.gob.ec/cgibin/RpWebEngine.exe/PortalAction?&MODE=MAIN&BASE=CPV2010&MAIN=WebServerMain.inl. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.

  23. Krupa, Christopher. 2009. Histories in red: Ways of seeing lynching in Ecuador. American Ethnologist 36(1): 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Landa, Ladislao. 2006. Pensamientos indígenas en nuestra América. In Crítica y teoría en el pensamiento social latinoamericano, ed. CLACSO, 11–75. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lazos, Elena and Evelyne Lenz. 2004. La Educación Indígena en el Páramo Zumbahueño del Ecuador: Demandas, Exitos y Fracasos de una Realidad. http://www.latautonomy.org/SEIC_18feb.pdf.

  26. Lucero, José Antonio. 2003. Locating the “Indian Problem”: Community, nationality, and contradiction in ecuadorian indigenous politics. Latin American Perspectives 30(1): 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pacari, Nina. 1984. Las culturas nacionales en el estado multinacional ecuatoriano. Cultura. Revista del Banco Central del Ecuador VI(18a): 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pajuelo, Ramón. 2004. Identidades en Movimiento. Tiempos de globalización, procesos sociopolíticos y movimiento indígena en los países centro andinos.. Caracas: Programa Globalización, Cultura y Transformaciones Sociales, CIPOST, FaCES, Universidad Central de Venezuela.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pásara, Luis (ed.). 2007. Los actores de la Justicia Latinoamericana. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pérez, Carlos. 2015. Justicia indígena. Quito: CONAIE, ECUARUNARI.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Prieto, Mercedes. 2004. Liberalismo y temor: Imaginando los sujetos indígenas en el Ecuador postcolonial 1895–1950. Quito: FLACSO, Abya-Yala.

    Google Scholar 

  32. de la Fuente, Jorge Resina. 2011. Participación y percepción de la CONAIE en el Ecuador plurinacional. Ciências Sociais Unisinos 47(2): 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  33. UNAE. s.a. [ca. 1986]. Problemática indígena y colonización en el oriente ecuatoriano. Reflexiones nacidas al interior de la U.N.A.E. (Unión de Nativos de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana). n.p.

  34. Wray, Alberto. 1993. El problema indígena y la reforma del Estado. In Derecho, Pueblos indígenas y reforma del Estado, ed. Juan Carlos Ribadeneira, 11–69. Quito: Abya-Yala.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Altmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altmann, P. “The Right to Self-determination”: Right and Laws Between Means of Oppression and Means of Liberation in the Discourse of the Indigenous Movement of Ecuador. Int J Semiot Law 29, 121–134 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-015-9415-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-015-9415-z

Keywords

Navigation