Abstract
The regularized solution of the external sphericalStokes boundary value problem as being used for computations of geoid undulations and deflections of the vertical is based upon theGreen functions S 1(Λ0, Φ0, Λ, Φ) ofBox 0.1 (R = R 0) andV 1(Λ0, Φ0, Λ, Φ) ofBox 0.2 (R = R 0) which depend on theevaluation point {Λ0, Φ0} ∈ S 2R0 and thesampling point {Λ, Φ} ∈ S 2R0 ofgravity anomalies Δ γ (Λ, Φ) with respect to a normal gravitational field of typegm/R (”free air anomaly”). If the evaluation point is taken as the meta-north pole of theStokes reference sphere S 2R0 , theStokes function, and theVening-Meinesz function, respectively, takes the formS(Ψ) ofBox 0.1, andV 2(Ψ) ofBox 0.2, respectively, as soon as we introduce {meta-longitude (azimuth), meta-colatitude (spherical distance)}, namely {A, Ψ} ofBox 0.5. In order to deriveStokes functions andVening-Meinesz functions as well as their integrals, theStokes andVening-Meinesz functionals, in aconvolutive form we map the sampling point {Λ, Φ} onto the tangent plane T0S 2R0 at {Λ0, Φ0} by means ofoblique map projections of type(i) equidistant (Riemann polar/normal coordinates),(ii) conformal and(iii) equiareal.Box 2.1.–2.4. andBox 3.1.– 3.4. are collections of the rigorously transformedconvolutive Stokes functions andStokes integrals andconvolutive Vening-Meinesz functions andVening-Meinesz integrals. The graphs of the correspondingStokes functions S 2(Ψ),S 3(r),⋯,S 6(r) as well as the correspondingStokes-Helmert functions H 2(Ψ),H 3(r),⋯,H 6(r) are given byFigure 4.1–4.5. In contrast, the graphs ofFigure 4.6–4.10 illustrate the correspondingVening-Meinesz functions V 2(Ψ),V 3(r),⋯,V 6(r) as well as the correspondingVening-Meinesz-Helmert functions Q 2(Ψ),Q 3(r),⋯,Q 6(r). The difference between theStokes functions / Vening-Meinesz functions andtheir first term (only used in the Flat Fourier Transforms of type FAST and FASZ), namelyS 2(Ψ) − (sin Ψ/2)−1,S 3(r) − (sinr/2R 0)−1,⋯,S 6(r) − 2R 0/r andV 2(Ψ) + (cos Ψ/2)/2(sin2 Ψ/2),V 3(r) + (cosr/2R 0)/2(sin2 r/2R 0),⋯,\(V_6 (r) + {{(R_0 \sqrt {4R_0^2 - r^2 } )} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{(R_0 \sqrt {4R_0^2 - r^2 } )} {r^2 }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {r^2 }}\) illustrate the systematic errors in the”flat” Stokes function 2/Ψ or ”flat”Vening-Meinesz function −2/Ψ2. The newly derivedStokes functions S 3(r),⋯,S 6(r) ofBox 2.1–2.3, ofStokes integrals ofBox 2.4, as well asVening-Meinesz functionsV 3(r),⋯,V 6(r) ofBox 3.1–3.3, ofVening-Meinesz integrals ofBox 3.4 — all of convolutive type — pave the way for the rigorousFast Fourier Transform and the rigorousWavelet Transform of theStokes integral / theVening-Meinesz integral of type ”equidistant”, ”conformal” and ”equiareal”.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Bellaire, R.G. (1971a): Stations of the geodetic uncertainties aloft, Eos. Trans. American Geophysical Union, Washington 1971
Bellaire, R.G. (1971b): Correlation functions on the upper half space, The Analytic Scienes Corporation, Reading, Mass., Report 1971
Bellaire, R.G. (1972): A discussion of flat earth statistical models for the gravity disturbances and their application, The Analytic Scienes Corporation, Reading, Mass., Report 1972
Bursa, M. (1994): Testing geopotential models. Earth, Moon and Planets64 (1994) 293–299
Forsberg, R. and M. G. Sideris (1993): Geoid computations by the multi-band spherical FFT approach, manuscripta geodaetica18 (1993) 82–90
Geodetic Work in the Netherlands 1991–1994: Report prepared for the General Assembly of the International Association of Geodesy, Boulder 1995, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft 1995
Grafarend, E. (1971a): Korrelationslängen von Schwereanomalien und Lotabweichungen, Z. Vermessungswesen96 (1971) 132–158
Grafarend, E. (1971b): Statistische Modelle zur Prädiktion von Lotabweichungen, Vermessungstechnik19 (1971) 66–68
Grafarend, E. (1971c): Isotropietests von Lotabweichungen Westdeutschlands, Z. Geophysik37 (1971) 719–733
Grafarend, E. (1971d): Lotabweichungsverteilungen Westdeutschlands und ihre gruppentheoretische Struktur, Mitt. Institut für Theoretische Geodäsie Universität Bonn, Nr. 1, Bonn 1971
Grafarend, E. (1972): Isotropietests von Lotabweichungsverteilungen in Westdeutschland II, Z. Geophysik38 (1972) 243–255
Grafarend, E. (1975): Geodetic prediction concepts, Bd. 13, Geodetic stochastic processes, Bd. 14, Methoden und Verfahren der mathematischen Physik (eds. B. Brosowski and E. Martensen) Mathematical Geodesy, B. I. Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim 1975
Grafarend, E. (1976): Geodetic applications of stochastic processes, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors21 (1976) 151–179
Grafarend, E. (1989): The geoid and the gravimetric boundary value problem, The Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Department of Geodesy, Report 18, Trita Geod 1018, Stockholm 1989
Grafarend, E., B. Heck, E.H. Knickmeyer (1985): The free versus fixed geodetic boundary value problem for different combinations of geodetic observables, Bulletin Gêodésique59 (1985) 11–32
Grafarend, E. and W. Keller (1995): Setup of observational functionals in gravity space as well as in geometry space, manuscripta geodaetica20 (1995) 301–325
Grafarend, E. und G. Offermanns (1975): Eine Lotabweichungskarte Westdeutschlands nach einem geodätisch konsistenten Kolmogorov-Wiener-Modell, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Report A 82, München 1975
Groten, E. (1965): An gravity prediction using mean anomalies, Dep. Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Report 47, Columbus 1965
Groten, E. (1966a): Analytic continuation of gravity using orthogonal functions, Dep. Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Report 53, Columbus 1966
Groten, E. (1966b): On the derivation of surface gravity anomalies from airborne measurements, Dep. Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Report 88, Columbus 1966
Groten, E. (1979): Geodesy and the Earth's gravity field, vol. I, Dümmler's Verlag, Bonn 1979
Groten, E. (1980): Geodesy and the Earth's gravity field, vol. II, Dümmler's Verlag, Bonn 1980
Haagmans, R., E. de Min and M. van Gelderen (1993): Fast evaluation of convolution integrals on the sphere using 1D FFT, and a comparison with existing methods for Stokes' integral, manuscripta geodaetica18 (1993) 227–241
Helmert, F.R. (1880/84): Die mathematischen und physikalischen Theorien der höheren Geodäsie, Teubner Verlag, Leipzig, I. Teil, Leipzig 1880, II. Teil, Leipzig 1884
Jordan, S.K. (1972a): Effects of geodetic uncertainties on a damped inertial navigation system, Report of the Analytic Sciences Corporation, Reading 1972
Jordan, S.K. (1972b): Discussion of Paper by L. Shaw, I. Paul and P. Henrikson, ”Statistical models for the vertical deflection from gravity-anomaly models”, J. Geophys. Res.77 (1972) 971–973
Jordan, S.K. (1972c): Self-consistent statistical models for the gravity anomaly, vertical deflections, and undulation of the geoid, J. Geophys. Res.77 (1972) 3660–3670
Jordan, S.K. (1973): Stationary statistical models for mass anomalies and gravity disturbances, Report of The Analytic Sciences Corporation, Reading 1973
Jordan, S.K. (1978): Statistical model for gravity, topography and density contrasts in the earth, J. Geophys. Res. ser. B83 (1978) 1816–1824
Jordan, S.K., P.J. Moonan and J.D. Weiss (1981): Statespace models of gravity disturbance gradiens, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems17 (1981) 610–619
Kasper, J.F. (1971): A second-order Markov gravity anomaly model, J. Geophys. Res.76 (1971) 7844–7849
Kling, T., M. Becker, H.J. Euler and E. Groten (1987): Studien zur detaillierten Geoidberechnung, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Report B 285, München 1987
Li, J. (1993a): The spherical convolution form of Vening-Meinesz formula, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica23 (1993) 161–166
Li, J. (1993b): An effective method of eliminating the approximation error in Stokes integration convolution formula, J. Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping18 (1993) No.4
Ning, J.,D. Chao and J. Li (1994): The spherical convolution form of the Vening-Meinesz formula, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica (1993) 11–16
Pick, M., J. Picha and V. Vyskocil (1973): Theory of the Earth's gravity field, Elsevier Scientific Publ., Amsterdam 1973
Schwarz, K.P., M.G. Sideris and R. Forsberg (1990): The use of FFT techniques in physical geodesy, Geophysical Journal International100 (1990) 485–514
Shaofeng, B. and D. Xurong (1991): On the singular integration in physical geodesy, manuscripta geodaetica16 (1991) 283–287
Shaofeng, B. and K. Zhang (1993): The planar solution of geodetic boundary value problem, manuscripta geodaetica18 (1993) 290–294
Shaw, L., I. Paul and P. Henrikson (1969): Statistical Models for the Vertical Deflection from Gravity-Anomaly Models, J. Geophys. Res.74 (1969) 4259–4265
Snyder, J.P. (1982): Map projections used by the U.S. Geological Survey, Geological Survey Bulletin 1532, United States Government Printing Office, Washington 1982
Stokes, G.G. (1849): On the variation of gravity on the surface of the earth, Trans. Cambridge Phil. Soc.8 (1849) 672–695
Strang van Hees, G. (1990): Stokes formula using fast Fourier techniques, manuscripta geodaetica15 (1990) 235–239
Vening-Meinesz, F.A. (1928): A formula expressing the deflection of the plumbline in the gravity anomalies and some formulae for the gravity field and the gravity potential outside the geoid, Proc. Sect. Sci. Kon. Akad. v. Wet. Amsterdam31 (1928) 315–331
Zhang, K., B. Shaofeng and W. Shen (1995): The singular integration of physical geodesy in the frequency domain, manuscripta geodaetica20 (1995) 241–247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grafarend, E.W., Krumm, F. The Stokes and Vening-Meinesz functionals in a moving tangent space. Journal of Geodesy 70, 696–713 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867148
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867148