Abstract
The study aims to probe the roles of learning desire and persistence in influencing Gen Z learners' continuance intention of using YouTube for learning in digital learning context. Building upon prior research, a research framework with 10 hypotheses was proposed and empirically tested by using Partial Least Squares Structure Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to analyze the data collected from 361 Gen Z learners. The empirical study results reveal that learners' perceived hedonic value has significantly positive effect on both learning desire and persistence. Also, learners' perceived utilitarian value has significantly positive effect on both learning desire and persistence. Learning desire is found to have positive impact on persistence. Furthermore, both learning desire and persistence have significantly positive effect on satisfaction, with learning desire exerting a greater influence. Moreover, both learning desire and learning satisfaction positively affect learners' continuance learning intention. The validated framework and findings can serve as the reference for educators and online learning platforms in designing courses and formulating teaching strategies in the context of leveraging YouTube for digital learning, so as to enhance learners' continuance learning intention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data of this study can be accessed upon request.
References
Abdullatif, H., & Ángel, V.-I.J. (2020). Relationship between motivations, personality traits and intention to continue using MOOCs. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4417–4435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10161-z
Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Zacharias, N., Dracup, M., & Bennett, S. (2019). How Do Students Adapt in Response to Academic Failure? Student Success, 10(3), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i3.1403
Aldahmani, S., Al-shami, S. A., Adil, H., & Sidek, S. (2020). A review paper on MOOCs development stages, types, and opportunities, and challenges. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(12), 172–179 https://www.sysrevpharm.org/articles/a-review-paper-on-moocs-development-stages-types-and-opportunities-and-challenges.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2021
Al-Emran, M., Arpaci, I., & Salloum, S. A. (2020). An empirical examination of continuous intention to use m-learning: An integrated model. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2899–2918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10094-2
Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018
Allen, D. (1999). Desire to Finish College: An Empirical Link Between Motivation and Persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018740226006
Al-Maroof, R. S., & Salloum, S. A. (2021). An Integrated model of continuous intention to use of google classroom. In Recent Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications (pp. 311–335). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_18
Andersson, H., & Bergman, L. R. (2011). The role of task persistence in young adolescence for successful educational and occupational attainment in middle adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 950. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023786
Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2017). Grit in the path to e-learning success. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.009
Arizzi, G., Breitenreiter, J., Khalsa, R., Iyer, R., Babin, L. A., & Griffin, M. (2020). Modeling business student satisfaction: Utilitarian value and hedonic value as drivers of satisfaction. Marketing Education Review, 30(4), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2020.1822186
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489765. Accessed 8 Oct 2021
Back, D. A., von Malotky, J., Sostmann, K., Peters, H., Hube, R., & Hoff, E. (2019). Experiences with using e-learning tools in orthopedics in an uncontrolled field study application. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 105(2), 389–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.002
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Guinalíu, M. (2012). Website usability, consumer satisfaction and the intention to use a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.11.001
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, pp. 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
Brahimi, T., & Sarirete, A. (2015). Learning outside the classroom through MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.013
Branka. (2023). Generation Z statistics – 2023. https://truelist.co/blog/generation-z-statistics/. Accessed 1 July 2023
Brubacher, M. R., & Silinda, F. T. (2019). Enjoyment and not competence predicts academic persistence for distance education students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4325
Chambers, B., Salter, A., & Muldrow, L. (2019). Getting past the gateway: an exploratory case on using utilitarian scientific literacy to support first-year students at-risk of leaving STEM. Education Sciences, 9, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040265
Chau, C. (2010). YouTube as a participatory culture. New Directions for Youth Development, 2010(128), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.376
Chen, J. V., Hiele, T. M., Kryszak, A., & Ross, W. H. (2020). Predicting Intention to participate in socially responsible collective action in social networking website groups. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(2), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00604
Cheok, M. L., & Wong, S. L. (2015). Predictors of e-learning satisfaction in teaching and learning for school teachers: A literature review. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 75–90. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085289. Accessed 8 Oct 2021
Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: Model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science, 35(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508099088
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., Lai, H., & Chang, C.-M. (2012). Re-examining the influence of trust on online repeat purchase intention: The moderating role of habit and its antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 835–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.021
Chiu, C. M., Wang, E. T., Fang, Y. H., & Huang, H. Y. (2014). Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24(1), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00407.x
Chou, S.-W., & Hung, I. H. (2016). Understanding knowledge outcome improvement at the post-adoption stage in a virtual community. Information Technology & People, 29(4), 774–806. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-05-2015-0121
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/e+Learning+and+the+Science+of+Instruction:+Proven+Guidelines+for+Consumers+and+Designers+of+Multimedia+Learning%2C+4th+Editionp-9781119158660. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Cobos, R., & Ruiz-Garcia, J. C. (2021). Improving learner engagement in MOOCs using a learning intervention system: A research study in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(4), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22316
Dağhan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). Modeling the continuance usage intention of online learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.066
DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S., Yaakub, M. Y., Ayob, J., & Ishak, R. (2013). The potential of Youtube for teaching and learning in the performing arts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1118–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.439
DiCerbo, K. E. (2014). Game-based assessment of persistence. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 17–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.1.17. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
DiCerbo, K. E. (2016). Assessment of task persistence. In Handbook of research on technology tools for real-world skill development (pp. 778–804). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9441-5.ch030
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0589
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1975). Motivation and second-language acquisition. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 31(3), 218–230. https://www.proquest.com/docview/57923239?accountid=14440&parentSessionId=Vo35oyXHLSqHaxK6ohua2a%2FXou6jJK006zCP%2FuvGqAU%3D. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 91–109. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3020&context=cais. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Goh, C., Leong, C., Kasmin, K., Hii, P., & Tan, O. (2017). Students’ experiences, learning outcomes and satisfaction in e-learning. Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, 13(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1298
Haidar, S., Farukh, F., & Dar, S. (2019). Desire for english in youth: An exploratory study of language learners in Pakistan. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v6i2.2625
Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000304
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Szeto, E., Tsai, C.-R., Kuo, Y.-C., & Hsu, W.-Y. (2016). Internet cognitive failure relevant to self-efficacy, learning interest, and satisfaction with social media learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.010
Hou, F., Guan, Z., Li, B., & Alain Yee Loong, C. (2020). Factors influencing people’s continuous watching intention and consumption intention in live streaming: Evidence from China [Live streaming]. Internet Research, 30(1), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-04-2018-0177
Hsieh, J.P.-A., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148830
Hsu, C.-L., & Lin, J.C.-C. (2020). Understanding continuance intention to use online to offline (O2O) apps. Electronic Markets, 30(4), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00354-x
Huang, P., & Hwang, Y. (2013). An exploration of EFL learners’ anxiety and e-learning environments. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.1.27-35
Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2005). Collegiality and community-building as a means for sustaining student persistence in the computer-mediated asynchronous learning environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(3), 1–18. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/193204/. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Jang, Y.-T., Chang, S. E., & Chen, P.-A. (2015). Exploring social networking sites for facilitating multi-channel retailing. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1430-z
Jang, Y.-T. J., Liu, A. Y., & Ke, W.-Y. (2022). Exploring smart retailing: anthropomorphism in voice shopping of smart speaker. Information Technology & People(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2021-0536
Kim, S.-H., & Park, S. (2021). Influence of learning flow and distance e-learning satisfaction on learning outcomes and the moderated mediation effect of social-evaluative anxiety in nursing college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education in Practice, 56(1), 103197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103197
Kim, S. S., Malhotra, N. K., & Narasimhan, S. (2005). Research note—two competing perspectives on automatic use: A theoretical and empirical comparison. Information Systems Research, 16(4), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0070
Kim, N., Smith, M. J., & Maeng, K. (2008). Assessment in online distance education: A comparison of three online programs at a university. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(1), 1–16. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nari-Kim-3/publication/271327851_Assessment_in_Online_Distance_Education_A_Comparison_of_Three_Online_Programs_at_a_University/links/54dd1fba0cf282895a3b45e4/Assessmentin-Online-Distance-Education-A-Comparison-of-Three-Online-Programs-at-a-University.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Kumar, T. (2021). Desire to learn, learn to shine’: Idolizing motivation in enhancing speaking skill among L2 learners. Kıbrıslı Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(1), 411–422.
Lechner, C. M., Danner, D., & Rammstedt, B. (2019). Grit (effortful persistence) can be measured with a short scale, shows little variation across socio-demographic subgroups, and is associated with career success and career engagement. PLoS ONE, 14(11), e0224814. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224814
Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Ip, T. (2017a). University english language learners’ readiness to use computer technology for self-directed learning. System, 67(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.05.001
Lee, C. S., Osop, H., Goh, D.H.-L., & Kelni, G. (2017b). Making sense of comments on YouTube educational videos: A self-directed learning perspective. Online Information Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2016-0274
Leri, I., & Theodoridis, P. (2019). The effects of the winery visitor experience on emotions, satisfaction and on post-visit behaviour intentions. Tourism Review, 74(3), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-07-2018-0092
Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: A literature review. Campus - Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741011073761
Liu, H. H., Shao, M. M., Liu, X. H., & Zhao, L. (2021). Exploring the influential factors on readers’ continuance intentions of E-book APPs: Personalization, usefulness, playfulness, and satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 640110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640110
Liu, J., & Tomasi, S. D. (2015). The effect of professor’s attractiveness on distance learning students. Journal of Educators Online, 12(2), 142–165. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068396. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Lo, L. Y. S., Lin, S. W., & Hsu, L. Y. (2016). Motivation for online impulse buying: A two-factor theory perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 759–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.012
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018). Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of youtube. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001
Morgan, G. A., Wang, J., Liao, H.-F., & Xu, Q. (2012). Using the dimensions of mastery questionnaire (DMQ) to assess mastery motivation of English-and Chinese-speaking children. In Handbook of self-regulatory processes in development: New directions and international perspectives (pp. 305–335). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203080719.ch14
Mubarak, A. A., Cao, H., & Zhang, W. (2022). Prediction of students’ early dropout based on their interaction logs in online learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1414–1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1727529
Newark, D. A. (2020). Desire and pleasure in choice. Rationality and Society, 32(2), 168–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463120921254
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Equity and disconfirmation perceptions as influences on merchant and product satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 372–383. https://doi.org/10.1086/209223
Özyeter, N. T., & Kutlu, Ö. (2018). Identifying the relationships between response behaviors for reading comprehension items and student characteristics. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(10), 148–157.
Patterson, P. G., & Spreng, R. A. (1997). Modelling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business-to-business, services context: An empirical examination. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(5), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239710189835
Poláková, P., & Klímová, B. (2019). Mobile technology and Generation Z in the English language classroom—A preliminary study. Education Sciences, 9(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030203
Pratama, S. H. H., Arifin, R. A., & Widianingsih, A. W. S. (2020). The use of youtube as a learning tool in teaching listening skill. International Journal of Global Operations Research, 1(3), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.47194/ijgor.v1i3.50
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
Rahmatika, R., Yusuf, M., & Agung, L. (2021). The effectiveness of YouTube as an online learning media. Journal of Education Technology, 5(1), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i1.33628
Rai, L., & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and general analysis of learner behavior. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(4), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.697
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Robertson, L. J., & Taylor, C. A. (2009). Student persistence in the human sciences: Freshman to sophomore year. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 101(1), 36–43. https://www.proquest.com/docview/218173202?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Rostaminezhad, M. A., Mozayani, N., Norozi, D., & Iziy, M. (2013). Factors related to e-learner dropout: Case study of IUST elearning center. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.100
Sánchez-Fernández, R., & Iniesta-Bonillo, M. Á. (2007). The concept of perceived value: A systematic review of the research. Marketing Theory, 7(4), 427–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931070831
Scarpin, J. E., Mondini, V. E. D., & Scarpin, M. R. S. (2018). Technology acceptance factors and student retention in online courses. The e - Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 12(3), 44–68. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1203825. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Schlee, R. P., Eveland, V. B., & Harich, K. R. (2020). From Millennials to Gen Z: Changes in student attitudes about group projects. Journal of Education for Business, 95(3), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2019.1622501
Schroeder, T. (2006). Desire. Philosophy Compass, 1(6), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00047.x
Sharma, S. K., Joshi, A., & Sharma, H. (2016). A multi-analytical approach to predict the Facebook usage in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.020
Shorey, S., Chan, V., Rajendran, P., & Ang, E. (2021). Learning styles, preferences and needs of generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 57, 103247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103247
Sokolova, K., & Perez, C. (2021). You follow fitness influencers on YouTube. But do you actually exercise? How parasocial relationships, and watching fitness influencers, relate to intentions to exercise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102276
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
To, P.-L., Liao, C., & Lin, T.-H. (2007). Shopping motivations on Internet: A study based on utilitarian and hedonic value. Technovation, 27(12), 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.01.001
Tran, Y. (2019). Computational thinking equity in elementary classrooms: What third-grade students know and can do. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117743918
Valadas, S. T., Almeida, L. S., & Araujo, A. M. (2017). The mediating effects of approaches to learning on the academic success of first-year college students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(6), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1188146
Van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Hartmann, T., Eden, A., & Veling, H. (2017). Spontaneous hedonic reactions to social media cues. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 20(5), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0530
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Wahyuni, A., Utami, A. R., & Education, E. (2021). the use of youtube video in encouraging speaking skill. Pustakailmu. Id, 7(3), 1–9.
Wang, H.-C., & Chen, C.W.-Y. (2020). Learning English from YouTubers: English L2 learners’ self-regulated language learning on YouTube. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1607356
Wang, C.-S., Li, Y.-C., & Tzeng, Y.-R. (2015). How to replicate the cognitive process in computer game-based learning units. Information Technology & People, 28(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2013-0053
Wiedmer, T. (2015). Generations do differ: Best practices in leading traditionalists, boomers, and generations X, Y, and Z. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 82(1), 51–58. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1770514324?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true. Accessed 22 Jan 2022
Yang, H.-L., & Lin, C.-L. (2014). Why do people stick to Facebook web site? A value theory-based view. Information Technology & People, 27(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-11-2012-0130
Yang, L., Bian, Y., Zhao, X., Liu, X., & Yao, X. (2021). Drivers’ acceptance of mobile navigation applications: An extended technology acceptance model considering drivers’ sense of direction, navigation application affinity and distraction perception. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 145, 102507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102507
Yoo, D. K., & Cho, S. (2020). Role of habit and value perceptions on m-learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(6), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1550731
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
Zheng, F., Khan, N. A., & Hussain, S. (2020). The COVID 19 pandemic and digital higher education: Exploring the impact of proactive personality on social capital through internet self-efficacy and online interaction quality. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105694
Zhu, Y., Zhang, J. H., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2020). University students’ online learning attitudes and continuous intention to undertake online courses: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 68(3), 1485–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09753-w
Funding
This study was partly supported by the Ministry of Education (Taiwan) under the award number PBM1101202 and PBM1110183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
The data of this study can be accessed upon request.
The participants of this study were voluntary and protected by using a code to replace their personal information. They were also informed that they could withdraw from the study any time.
Conflict of interest
The authors would like to state that there is no potential conflict of interest in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jang, YT., Chiang, IT. Incorporating desire and persistence into understanding Gen Z learners’ continuance intention toward using Youtube for learning in digital learning context. Educ Inf Technol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12202-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12202-9