Abstract
The use of growth factor models for trip distribution has given way in the past to the use of more complex synthetic models. Nevertheless growth factor models are still used, for example in modelling external trips, in small area studies, in input-output analysis, and in category analysis. In this article a particular growth factor model, the Furness, is examined. Its application and functional form are described together with the method of iteration used in its operation. The “expected information” statistic is described and interpreted and it is shown that the Furness model predicts a trip distribution which, when compared with observed trips, has the minimum expected information subject to origin and destination constraints. An equivalent entropy maximising derivation is described and the two methods compared to show how the Furness iteration can be used in gravity models with specified deterrence functions. A trip distribution model explicitly incorporating information from observed trips, is then derived.
It is suggested that if consistency is to be maintained between iteration, calibration, and the derivation of gravity models, then expected information should be used as the calibration statistic to measure goodness of fit. The importance of consistency in this respect is often overlooked.
Lastly, the limitations of the models are discussed and it is suggested that it may be better to use the Furness iteration rather than any other, since it is more fully understood. In particular its ease of calculation makes it suitable for use in small models computed by hand.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacharach, M., (1970). Biproportional Matrices and Input-Output Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blumenfeld, D. E. (1972). “Generalisation of the derivation of trip distribution models,” Research Group in Traffic Studies, U.C.L., Progress Report 1971, Smeed, R. J. Traffic Engineering and Control, vol. 13 No. 10 February p.450.
Charness, A., Raike, W. M., and Bettinger, C. O. (1972). “An extremal and information — theoretic characterization of some interzonal transfer models,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, December vol. 6, No. 6 pp. 531 – 537.
Evans, A. W. (1970). “Some properties of trip distribution methods,” Transportation Research, April, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 19 - 37.
Furness, K. P. (1965). “Time Function Iteration,” Traffic Engineering and Control, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 458 - 460, November.
Hathaway, P. J. (1973). “Trip Distribution and Disaggregation,” R. M. 418 Department of Planning and Transportation, Greater London Council.
Hyman, G. M. (1969). “The calibration of trip distribution models,” C.E.S. Working Paper 31, April, London.
Kirby, H. R. (1972). “Theoretical Requirements for the Calibration of Gravity Models,” P. T..R. C. Seminar Proceedings, Urban Traffic Model Research, London.
Newland, R. M. (1971) “Traffic models for transport studies in Staffordshire,” Traffic Engineering and Control, May, vol. 13, no. 1 pp. 25 - 30.
Ottensen K. A. (1972). P.T.R.C. Proceedings, Urban Traffic Models Research, wk 1.
Theil, H. (1971). Principles of Econometrics, Amsterdam: North Holland.
Tribus, M. (1969). Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs. Oxford: Pergamon.
Wilson, A. G. (1970). Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. London: Pion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morphet, R. A note on the calculation and calibration of doubly constrained trip distribution models. Transportation 4, 43–53 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166888
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166888