Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Video Demonstrations and Particulate Animation in General Chemistry

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different visualization techniques have been used for teaching chemistry concepts. Previous studies have shown that when molecular animations and video demonstrations are used, students seem to better correlate all three levels of representation: macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic. This thinking process allows the students to improve their conceptual understanding and ability to create dynamic mental models. In this study, general chemistry students viewed three experiments involving dynamic fluid equilibrium in a graphic design, a video demonstration, and a molecular animation. The study investigated whether video demonstrations or particulate animations helped the students' conceptual understanding, and if the order of visualizations (video or animation first) produced any differences. Students showed improvement after each visualization. Surprisingly, there was significant improvement in responses between the first and second visualization. This work shows the importance of combining both types of visualizations, but it does not indicate a preference toward a specific order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., and Windschitl, M. A. (1998). Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction. Journal of Chemical Education 75: 1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, W. C., Ramsey, L. L., Walczek, J., and Eddy, D. (2000). Using demonstration assessments to improve learning. Journal of Chemical Education 77: 1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francisco, J. S., and Nicoll, G. (2001). An investigation of the factors influencing student performance in physical chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 78: 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roadrangka, V., Yeany, R. H., and Padilla, M. J. (1985). Astudy of the relationship among type and quality of implementation of science teaching strategy, student formal reasoning ability, and student engagement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 22: 743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J., Kozma, R., Jones, T., Wykoff, J., Marx, N., and Davis, J. (1997). Use of simultaneous-synchronized macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations to enhance the teach-ing and learning of chemical concepts. Journal of Chemical Education 74: 330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, M. J., and Greenbowe, T. J. (1997a). Students' misconceptions in electrochemistry: Current flow in electrolyte solutions and the salt bridge. Journal of Chemical Education 74: 819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, M. J., and Greenbowe, T. J. (1997). Common student mis-conceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34: 377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, V. M., and Abraham, M. R. (1995). The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 521-534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimrot, R., Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Science Teaching, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, in preparation.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velázquez-Marcano, A., Williamson, V.M., Ashkenazi, G. et al. The Use of Video Demonstrations and Particulate Animation in General Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13, 315–323 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000045458.76285.fe

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000045458.76285.fe

Navigation