Skip to main content
Log in

Public environmental concern and enterprise environmental protection investment: from the perspective of enterprise life cycle

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the information era, effective environmental protection cannot be achieved without public concern. In this paper, public environmental concern (PEC) is subdivided into public concern about environmental pollution (PCEP), environmental regulations (PCER), and green behavior (PCGB). Based on the data set of the listed companies in China from 2011 to 2019 and the Baidu Index, we examine the influence of the three types of PECs on enterprises’ environmental protection investment (EPI) in their different stages of the enterprise life cycle. It was found that three types of PECs have a significant impact on EPI, with PCER having the greatest effect. The impact of PEC varies at stages of the enterprise life cycle, and only in the growth stage, the three kinds of PECs play a significant role in promoting enterprises’ EPI, while not in the maturity and the decline stages. Heterogeneity analysis shows that this positive effect is only significant for enterprises without ISO14001 certification and those in western China; PCER can significantly promote capitalized environmental investment, while PCEP can significantly promote expensed environmental investment. The findings can help to clarify the key role of the public in supervising the enterprises’ environmental protection behavior and provide a decision-making basis for enterprises to dynamically adjust their environmental investment strategies in the whole life cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72174052 and 71902051).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LL, YB and RY contributed to conceptualization, research framework, resources, and funding acquisition; JZ contributed to data collection and analysis, software, and methodology; LL and JZ performed writing–original draft; LL, JZ, YB and RY performed writing–review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Bai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.

Table 12 Regression results of instrumental variable for IPEC
Table 13 Regression results of instrumental variable for PCEP
Table 14 Regression results of instrumental variable for PCER
Table 15 Regression results of instrumental variable for PCGB
Table 16 Robustness test for replacing samples (without dividing the life cycle)
Table 17 Robustness test for replacing samples (dividing the life cycle)
Table 18 Robustness test of replacing enterprise life cycle division

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Zhang, J., Bai, Y. et al. Public environmental concern and enterprise environmental protection investment: from the perspective of enterprise life cycle. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 15031–15065 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03233-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03233-w

Keywords

Navigation