Skip to main content
Log in

Selecting a reference frame

  • Published:
Spatial Cognition and Computation

Abstract

Reference frames are representations that parse space. In the case of spatial terms, reference frames mediate the mapping of linguistic expressions onto spatial configurations of objects. In the sentence ``The fly is above the cat,'' ``above'' is defined with respect to a reference frame that is imposed on the cat. Different types of reference frames can be used to define spatial terms, each based on a different source of information. For example, gravity, the orientation of objects in the scene or the orientation of the viewer can all be used to set the orientation of a reference frame. When these reference frames disagree (because the viewer is reclining or because the objects in the scene are overturned), there are competing definitions for the spatial term, resulting in the need for reference frame selection. The purpose of this paper is to review a line of research that examines reference frame selection in the context of spatial language. This work shows that all reference frames are initially active and assign a direction to a spatial term. Moreover, this activation is automatic, and is followed by the selection of a single reference frame, with selection accompanied by inhibition of the non-selected frames. Parallels between reference frame selection in language and in perception and attention are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behrmann, M. and Tipper, S.P. (1999). Attention Accesses Multiple Reference Frames: Evidence from Visual Neglect, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25: 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, S.E. and Clark, H.H. (1996). Conceptual Pacts and Lexical Choice in Conversation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22: 1482–1493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson-Radvansky, L.A. and Irwin, D.E. (1993). Frames of Reference in Vision and Language: Where is Above? Cognition 46: 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson-Radvansky, L.A. and Irwin, D.E. (1994). Reference Frame Activation During Spatial Term Assignment, Journal of Memory and Language 33: 646–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson-Radvansky, L.A. and Jiang, Y. (1998). Inhibition Accompanies Reference Frame Selection, Psychological Science 9: 386–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson-Radvansky, L.A. and Logan, G.D. (1997). The Influence of Reference Frame Selec-tion on Spatial Template Construction, Journal of Memory and Language 37: 411–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H. (1973). Space, Time, Semantics, and the Child. In T. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H. and Wilkes-Gibbs, D.L. (1986). Referring as a Collaborative Process, Cognition 22: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corballis, M.C., Nagourney, B.A., Shetzer, L.I. and Stefanatos, G. (1978). Mental Rotation Under Head Tilt: Factors Influencing the Location of the Subject Reference Frame, Perception & Psychophysics 24: 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, E., Regier, T. and Huttenlocher, J. (in press). Linguistic and Non-linguistic Categorization, Cognition.

  • Fillmore, C.J. (1975). Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. (1995). Negative Priming from Ignored Distractors in Visual Selection: A Review, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2: 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, N., Henkel, L.A. and Zengas, T. (1995). Parsing Surrounding Space Into Regions, Memory & Cognition 23: 397–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, N. and Tversky, B. (1990). Searching Imagined Environments, Journal of Experimental Psychology 119: 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A.D. and Levelt, W.J.M. (1990). Spatial Reference in Weightlessness: Perceptual Factors and Mental Representations, Perception & Psychophysics 47: 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, A. (1989). A Unified Theory of Meaning of Some Spatial Relational Terms, Cognition 31: 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, S. and Anderson, A. (1987). Saying What you Mean in Dialogue: A Study in Conceptual and Semantic Co-ordination, Cognition 27: 181–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, B.S. and Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of Return to Object-based and Environment-based Locations, Perception & Psychophysics 5: 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, W.G. and Tarr, M.J. (1995). Spatial Language and Spatial Representation, Cognition 55: 39–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G.E. and Parsons, L.M. (1988). Scene-based and Viewer-centered Representations for Comparing Shapes, Cognition 30: 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W.J.M. (1984). Some Perceptual Limitations on Talking About Space. In A.J. van Doorn, W.A. van der Grind and J.J. Koenderink (eds.), Limits in Perception. Utrecht: VNU Science Press, pp. 323–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. (1996). Frames of Reference and Molyneux's Questions: Cross-linguistic Evidence. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G.D. and Sadler, D.D. (1996). A Computational Analysis of the Apprehension of Spatial Relations. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garretts (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 493–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, P. and Jolicoeur, P. (1990). The Spatial Frame of Reference in Object Naming and Discrimination of Left-right Reflections, Memory & Cognition 18: 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A. and Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1976). Language and Perception.Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 374–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, D.G. and Clark, H.H. (1988). Interpreting Words in Spatial Descriptions, Language and Cognitive Processes 3: 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, C.P., Kane, M.J. and Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of Negative Priming, Psycholo-gical Bulletin 118: 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, W.T. (1977). Inhibitory and Facilitatory Processes in Selective attention, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3: 444–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schober, M. (1993). Spatial Perspective-taking in Conversation, Cognition 47: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N. and Metzler, J. (1971). Mental Rotation of Three-dimensional Objects, Science 171: 701–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1983). How Language Structures Spaces. In H.L. Pick and L.P. Acredolo (eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 225–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S.P. (1985). The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A: 571–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S.P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L.M. and Burak, A.L. (1994). Object-and Environment-based Inhibition of Return of Visual Attention, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 478–499.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, L.A. Selecting a reference frame. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1, 365–379 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010071109785

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010071109785

Navigation