Skip to main content
Log in

“It was taught good and I learned a lot”: Intellectual practices and ESL learners in the middle years

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on some of the findings from research that investigated how the notion of ’intellectual quality’ is played out in schools where there are large numbers of students who are learning through the medium of English as a second language (ESL). Starting with the premise that high challenge, high support classrooms benefit all learners, the paper discusses and illustrates the recurring intellectual practices identified in five linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms, where the teachers were involved in action research projects. The paper also discusses the collaborative process by which the research was undertaken, and the teacher learning that resulted. It concludes with a brief discussion of the implications for pedagogy, and suggests that the ’apprenticeship’ approach that broadly describes the pedagogy adopted by the teachers has the potential to be particularly significant for ESL learners’ engagement and participation in curriculum and language learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (3rd ed.). York: Dialogos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. (2005). Education, Culture and Cognition: Intervening for Growth. Keynote address, International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology, University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.) (1997). Improving schooling for language minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. In M. Wittrock, Ed., Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328–375). NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasquillo, A., & London, C. (1993). Parents and schools. NY: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J., & Holum A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible, American Educator, 6(11), 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Schon, E. (1996). Who teaches and why?: Dilemmas for building a profession for twenty-first century schools. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 67–101). NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & Le Pore, P. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Research Journal 32(4), 687–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (forthcoming. Challenging expectations: Literacy, intellectual quality and ESL learners in the middle years. New Haven: Heinemann.

  • Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom: Students, teachers and researchers. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning, TESOL Quarterly, 37(ii), 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect Special Issue, 20(1), 6–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf, Ed., Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, L. (1997). Teacher support and teacher challenge in promoting learner autonomy. Perspectives 23(2). Retrieved March 21, 2005, from www.learningpaths.org/ papers /papersupport.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality in school: the contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education, 65, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1994). Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education. In B. Steirer, & J. Maybin (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in educational practice (pp. 92–110). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, E., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement. Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators. Madison WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping tracks: How schools structure inequality. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study (2001). The Queensland school reform longitudinal study, final report. Brisbane: Education Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobsen, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. NY: Rinehart and Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (ed), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (ed), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky L. (1987). The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol 1. Thinking and Speaking. NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1999). Using the toolkit of discourse in the activity of learning and teaching. In Wells, G.). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walqui, A. (1999). Assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse students: Considerations for the twenty-first century. In Including Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students in Standards-Based Reform: A Report on McREL’s Diversity Roundtable 1, Aurora, Colorado, 53–84. Retrieved 30 April 2007 from http://www.mcrel/org

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibbons, P. “It was taught good and I learned a lot”: Intellectual practices and ESL learners in the middle years. AJLL 31, 155–173 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651795

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651795

Navigation