Skip to main content
Log in

Structured coaching as a means to improve sonographic visualization of the appendix: a quality improvement initiative

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Ultrasound of the right lower quadrant for appendicitis requires specific training and practice. Improved visualization of the appendix can result in decreased utilization of computed tomography. Increasing the sensitivity of ultrasound for appendicitis thus decreases radiation exposure, reduces cost, and improves the patient healthcare experience in accordance with the three principles of the triple aim designated by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a structured training program supplemented by technologist feedback on sonographic visualization of the appendix in a large pediatric health system.

Methods

The baseline ultrasound visualization frequency was computed for 20 ultrasound technologists in a large pediatric health system. Following this, technologists were informed of their individual and relative performance. Those with visualization frequencies less than 75% were provided structured training by a designated sonographer with an appendix visualization frequency above 75% while those with greater than 75% visualization continued to be monitored and informed of their monthly frequency. Following this structured training, appendix visualization frequencies were monitored over the next 5 months.

Results

There was no significant effect of sonographer career experience on the baseline appendix visualization frequency. Fourteen of 20 technologists demonstrated improved visualization frequencies post-intervention. The composite visualization frequency among these 20 technologists improved from 66.55 to 69.14%. This resulted in a potential savings of 38 CT scans during the post-intervention period.

Conclusion

An appendix visualization rate monitoring program coupled with structured training was successful in improving the appendix visualization rate throughout a large pediatric health system. This program demonstrates the positive effect that monitoring and targeted intervention can have on a quality improvement program. The program continues to be carried out as part of a plan-study-do-act cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rentea RM, St Peter SD (2017) Pediatric appendicitis. Surg Clin North Am 97:93–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider C, Kharbanda A, Bachur R (2007) Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort. Ann Emerg Med 49:778–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatt M, Joseph L, Ducharme FM, Joseph L, Ducharme FM, Dougherty G, McGillivray D (2009) Prospective validation of the Pediatric Appendicitis Score in a Canadian pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 16:591–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Athans BS, Depinet HE, Towbin AJ, Zhang Y, Zhang B, Trout AT (2016) Use of clinical data to predict appendicitis in patients with equivocal US findings. Radiology 280:557–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koberlein GC, Trout AT, Rigsby CK et al (2019) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® suspected appendicitis—child. J Am Coll Radiol 16:S252–S263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yigiter M, Kantarci M, Yalcin O, Yalcin A, Salman AB (2011) Does obesity limit the sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis in children? Clin Ultrasound 39:187–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Josephson T, Styrud J, Eriksson S (2000) Ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. Body mass index as selection factor for US examination. Acta Radiol 41:486–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abo A, Shannon M, Taylor G, Bachur R (2011) The influence of body mass index on the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in diagnosing appendicitis in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 27:731–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schuh S, Man C, Cheng A, Murphy A, Mohanta A, Moineddin R, Tomlinson G, Langer JC, Doria AS (2011) Predictors of non-diagnostic ultrasound scanning in children with suspected appendicitis. J Pediatr 158:112–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwon JK, Trexler N, Reish J, Pfeifer CM, Ginos J, Powell JA, Veltkamp J, Anene A, Fernandes N, Chen LE (2020) Correlating abdominal wall thickness and body mass index to predict usefulness of right lower quadrant ultrasound for evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. Pediatr Emerg Care 36:e156–e159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfeifer CM, Xie L, Atem FD, Mathew MS, Schiess DM, Messiah SE (2022) Body mass index as a predictor of sonographic visualization of the pediatric appendix. Pediatr Radiol 52:42–49

  13. American Registry for Diagnostic Sonography (2022) Status verification. Retrieved from: https://www.ardms.org/maintain-certification/registrant-support/statusverification/. 25 May 2022

  14. Pfeifer CM (2020) The impact of decreased interest in pediatric radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 27:759–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J (2008) The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff 27:759–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saito JM, Yan Y, Evashwick TW, Warner BW, Tarr PI (2013) Use and accuracy of diagnostic imaging by hospital type in pediatric appendicitis. Pediatrics 131:e37–e44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cory M. Pfeifer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pfeifer, C.M., Carrejo, B., Lewis, S. et al. Structured coaching as a means to improve sonographic visualization of the appendix: a quality improvement initiative. Emerg Radiol 30, 161–166 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02106-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02106-5

Keywords

Navigation