Abstract
Purpose
Ultrasound of the right lower quadrant for appendicitis requires specific training and practice. Improved visualization of the appendix can result in decreased utilization of computed tomography. Increasing the sensitivity of ultrasound for appendicitis thus decreases radiation exposure, reduces cost, and improves the patient healthcare experience in accordance with the three principles of the triple aim designated by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a structured training program supplemented by technologist feedback on sonographic visualization of the appendix in a large pediatric health system.
Methods
The baseline ultrasound visualization frequency was computed for 20 ultrasound technologists in a large pediatric health system. Following this, technologists were informed of their individual and relative performance. Those with visualization frequencies less than 75% were provided structured training by a designated sonographer with an appendix visualization frequency above 75% while those with greater than 75% visualization continued to be monitored and informed of their monthly frequency. Following this structured training, appendix visualization frequencies were monitored over the next 5 months.
Results
There was no significant effect of sonographer career experience on the baseline appendix visualization frequency. Fourteen of 20 technologists demonstrated improved visualization frequencies post-intervention. The composite visualization frequency among these 20 technologists improved from 66.55 to 69.14%. This resulted in a potential savings of 38 CT scans during the post-intervention period.
Conclusion
An appendix visualization rate monitoring program coupled with structured training was successful in improving the appendix visualization rate throughout a large pediatric health system. This program demonstrates the positive effect that monitoring and targeted intervention can have on a quality improvement program. The program continues to be carried out as part of a plan-study-do-act cycle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925
Rentea RM, St Peter SD (2017) Pediatric appendicitis. Surg Clin North Am 97:93–112
Schneider C, Kharbanda A, Bachur R (2007) Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort. Ann Emerg Med 49:778–784
Bhatt M, Joseph L, Ducharme FM, Joseph L, Ducharme FM, Dougherty G, McGillivray D (2009) Prospective validation of the Pediatric Appendicitis Score in a Canadian pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 16:591–596
Athans BS, Depinet HE, Towbin AJ, Zhang Y, Zhang B, Trout AT (2016) Use of clinical data to predict appendicitis in patients with equivocal US findings. Radiology 280:557–567
Koberlein GC, Trout AT, Rigsby CK et al (2019) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® suspected appendicitis—child. J Am Coll Radiol 16:S252–S263
Yigiter M, Kantarci M, Yalcin O, Yalcin A, Salman AB (2011) Does obesity limit the sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis in children? Clin Ultrasound 39:187–190
Josephson T, Styrud J, Eriksson S (2000) Ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. Body mass index as selection factor for US examination. Acta Radiol 41:486–488
Abo A, Shannon M, Taylor G, Bachur R (2011) The influence of body mass index on the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in diagnosing appendicitis in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 27:731–736
Schuh S, Man C, Cheng A, Murphy A, Mohanta A, Moineddin R, Tomlinson G, Langer JC, Doria AS (2011) Predictors of non-diagnostic ultrasound scanning in children with suspected appendicitis. J Pediatr 158:112–118
Kwon JK, Trexler N, Reish J, Pfeifer CM, Ginos J, Powell JA, Veltkamp J, Anene A, Fernandes N, Chen LE (2020) Correlating abdominal wall thickness and body mass index to predict usefulness of right lower quadrant ultrasound for evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. Pediatr Emerg Care 36:e156–e159
Pfeifer CM, Xie L, Atem FD, Mathew MS, Schiess DM, Messiah SE (2022) Body mass index as a predictor of sonographic visualization of the pediatric appendix. Pediatr Radiol 52:42–49
American Registry for Diagnostic Sonography (2022) Status verification. Retrieved from: https://www.ardms.org/maintain-certification/registrant-support/statusverification/. 25 May 2022
Pfeifer CM (2020) The impact of decreased interest in pediatric radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 27:759–769
Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J (2008) The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff 27:759–769
Saito JM, Yan Y, Evashwick TW, Warner BW, Tarr PI (2013) Use and accuracy of diagnostic imaging by hospital type in pediatric appendicitis. Pediatrics 131:e37–e44
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pfeifer, C.M., Carrejo, B., Lewis, S. et al. Structured coaching as a means to improve sonographic visualization of the appendix: a quality improvement initiative. Emerg Radiol 30, 161–166 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02106-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02106-5